Since the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, women's representation in public offices has grown slowly, and women are still greatly underrepresented in most states and in the national government. Since 1975, the women's movement has provided impetus for the steady growth in the numbers of women in office. The number of women in Congress, 31, is the highest ever. Women constitute 18 percent of the state legislatures, 17 percent of state executives, 9 percent of county governing boards, and 14 percent of mayors and city councils. The proportion of women in America's Congress is about half the average for national legislative bodies throughout the world. Many theories have been developed to explain the under-representation of women in politics. Political culture, socialization, and role conflict have all had an impact on women's representation. Discrimination against women by political elites and voters has also existed. Finally, the political structure itself forms barriers to the election of women. Current trends, however, are favorable to the continued gradual increase in the number of women in public office.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Concept of Representation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967), chap. 4.
2.
2. Ibid., pp. 86-91.
3.
3. Virginia Shapiro, “Research Frontier Essay: When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women,”American Political Science Review, 75:703-704 (Sept. 1981).
4.
4. “The Gender Gap in Presidential Voting: 1980-88” (Report, Center for the American Woman and Politics, National Information Bank on Women in Public Office, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University, 1989).
5.
5. “The Gender Gap” (Report, Center for the American Woman and Politics, 1987).
6.
6. Susan J. Carroll, Women as Candidates in American Politics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987), p. 321.
7.
7. Susan J. Carroll and Ella Taylor, “Gender Differences in Policy Priorities,”CAWP News & Notes, 7:3-4 (Winter 1989).
8.
8. Peter Bachrach, The Theory of Democratic Elitism: A Critique (Boston: Little, Brown, 1967), p. 3.
9.
9. Susan J. Carroll, “Woman Candidates and Support for Feminist Concerns: The Closet Feminist Syndrome,”Western Political Quarterly, 37:307 (June 1984).
10.
10. “Bringing More Women into Public Office” (Report, Center for the American Woman and Politics, 1984).
11.
11. Robert Darcy, Susan Welch, and Janet Clark, Women, Elections and Representation (New York: Longman, 1987), p. 11.
12.
12. Martin Gruberg, “From Nowhere to Where? Women in State and Local Politics,”Social Science Journal, 21:6 (Jan. 1984).
13.
13. “Statewide Elective Executive Women 1990” (Report, Center for the American Woman and Politics, 1990).
14.
14. “Women in Municipal Office 1990” (Report, Center for the American Woman and Politics, 1990).
15.
15. Darcy, Welch, and Clark, Women, Elections and Representation, p. 29.
16.
16. Carol M. Mueller, “Feminism and the New Women in Public Office,”Women & Politics, 2:9 (Fall 1982).
17.
17. “Women Appointed to Presidential Cabinets 1989” (Report, Center for the American Woman and Politics, 1989).
18.
18. Susan J. Carroll, “New Strategies to Bring More Women into Office: Organized Efforts to Increase the Number of Women Appointed to Recent Presidential Administrations in the United States” (Paper delivered at the “Vater Staat Und Seine Frauen” Conference in Berlin, West Germany, 1988).
19.
19. Facts on File: World News Digest, 49:783 (Oct. 1989).
20.
20. “Women in the U.S. Congress 1990” (Report, Center for the American Woman and Politics, 1990).
21.
21. “Women in State Legislatures 1990” (Report, Center for the American Woman and Politics, 1990).
22.
22. “Women in Municipal Office 1990.”
23.
23. Daniel J. Elazar, American Federalism: A View from the States (New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1966), pp. 86-94.
24.
24. Darcy, Welch, and Clark, Women, Elections and Representation, pp. 13-14.
25.
25. Ibid., pp. 21-22.
26.
26. Ibid., p. 50.
27.
27. Wilma Rule, “Why More Women Are State Legislators: A Research Note,”Western Political Quarterly, 43:443 (June 1990).
28.
Marianne Githens and Jewel L. Prestage, eds., A Portrait of Marginality: The Political Behaviour of the American Woman (New York: David McKay, 1977), chap. 1.
29.
29. Diane L. Fowlkes, “Ambitious Political Woman: Counter Socialization and Political Party Context,”Women & Politics, 4:7-10 (Winter 1984).
30.
30. Susan J. Carroll, “The Personal Is Political: The Intersection of Private Lives and Public Roles among Women and Men in Elective and Appointive Office,”Women & Politics, 9:57 (Summer 1989).
31.
31. Janet Clark, Charles D. Hadley, and R. Darcy, “Political Ambition among Men and Women State Party Leaders: Testing the Countersocialization Perspective,”American Politics Quarterly, 17:196 (Apr. 1989).
32.
32. Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, Political Woman (New York: Basic Books, 1974), p. 38.
33.
33. Carol Nechemias, “Changes in the Election of Women to U.S. State Legislative Seats,”Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12:125-142 (Feb. 1987).
34.
34. Kristi Andersen, “Working Women and Political Participation, 1952-1972,”American Journal of Political Science, 19:439-453 (Aug. 1975).
35.
35. Susan Welch, “Recruitment of Women to Office: A Discriminant Analysis,”Western Political Quarterly, 31:372-380 (Sept. 1978).
36.
36. Harold D. Clarke and Allan Kornberg, “Moving up the Political Escalator: Women Party Officials in the United States and Canada,”Journal of Politics, 41:454 (May 1979).
37.
37. Claudi Wallis, “Onward Women,”Time, 4 Dec. 1989, pp. 80-89.
38.
38. Barbara S. Deckard, The Women's Movement: Political, Socioeconomic, and Psychological Issues, 3d ed. (New York: Harper & Row, 1983), chap. 14.
39.
Susan Tolchin and Martin Tolchin, Clout: Womanpower and Politics (New York: Capricorn, 1976).
40.
Barbara Burrell , “Women's and Men's Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives, 1972-1982: A Finance Gap?”American Politics Quarterly, 13:251-272 (July 1985).
41.
41. Susan Welch and Lee Sigelman, “Changes in Public Attitudes toward Women in Politics,”Social Science Quarterly, 63:312-322 (June 1982).
42.
42. Susan Welchet al., “The Effect of Candidate Gender on Electoral Outcomes in State Legislative Races: A Research Note,”Western Political Quarterly, 38:464-475 (Sept. 1985).
43.
43. Kristi Andersen and Stuart Thorson, “Some Structural Barriers to the Election of Women to Congress: A Simulation,”Western Political Quarterly, 37:143-156 (Mar. 1984).
44.
44. Susan A. McManus, “A City's First Female Officeholder: `Coattails' for Future Female Officeholders,”Western Political Quarterly, 34:88-99 (Mar. 1981).
45.
45. Wilma Rule, “Electoral Systems, Contextual Factors, and Women's Opportunity for Election to Parliament in Twenty-Three Democracies,”Western Political Quarterly, 40:477-498 (Sept. 1987).
46.
46. Darcy, Welch, and Clark, Women, Elections and Representation, chap. 6.
47.
47. Carroll, Women as Candidates, p. 41.
48.
48. R. Darcy, Susan Welch, and Janet Clark, “Women Candidates in Single- and Multi-Member Districts,”Social Science Quarterly, 66:951 (Dec. 1985).
49.
49. Irene Diamond, Sex Roles in the State House (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1977), chaps. 1-3.
50.
50. Richard L. Engstrom, M. D. McDonald, and Bih-Er Chou, “The Election of Women to Central City Councils in the U.S.” (Paper delivered at the Seventh Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Toronto, 1984).
51.
51. Ethel Klein, Gender Politics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984), pp. 1-8.
52.
52. “1990 Women Candidates” (Center for the American Woman and Politics, 1990).
