Plato at the Keyboard: Telecommunications Technology and Education Policy

Abstract

The pace of adoption of distance-learning services has accelerated during the past few years due to more reliable equipment, lower costs, and better design of learning materials. Many new applications for distance learning emphasize low-end equipment with fewer bells and whistles, a new or extended use for an existing technology or network, interactive learning components, and new partnerships between public and private sector groups. In implementing new distance-learning applications, it is important to emphasize the service to be provided, not the technology that provides it. Further, teachers should be viewed as partners who are essential to the success of an application, not as enemies of technology. From a policy perspective, telecommunications may be viewed as a highway system that will serve a vital role in education and economic development during the next century. In order to construct a comprehensive highway system, it will be necessary to organize many existing telecommunications groups, such as public broadcasters, cable operators, and telephone companies.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

idem , Origins of Western Literacy (Toronto: Toronto Institute for Studies in Education, 1976).

2. Havelock , Preface to Plato, pp. 3-20.

3. Ithiel De Sola Pool , ed., The Social Impact of the Telephone (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1976).

4. Kenneth Bacon , “Many Educators View Involved Parents as Key to Children's Success in Schools,” Wall Street Journal, 31 July 1990.

5. Lynn Gisi and Roy Forbes , The Information Society: Will Our High School Graduates Be Ready? (Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States, 1982), pp. 52-53.

6. U.S., Congress, Office of Technology Assessment , Power On: New Tools for Teaching and Learning (Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, 1988), p. iii.

7. For a succinct treatment of problems in American education, see Fortune Magazine, special issue, Saving Our Schools (Spring 1990).

8. U.S., Congress, Office of Technology Assessment , Linking for Learning: A New Course for Education (Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, 1989), pp. 8-9.

9. Ibid., p. 4.

10.

Telescience: Scientific Communication in the Information Age, ed. Murray Aborn (Jan. 1988).

11.

11. For a more comprehensive discussion of policy issues associated with fiber optics, see Robert Pepper , Through the Looking Glass: Integrated Broadband Networks, Regulatory Policy and Institutional Change, Working Paper No. 24 (Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission, Office of Plans and Policy, Nov. 1988).

12.

Symposium on Experiments in Interactive Cable TV (Spring 1978).

13.

13. Peter Clarke and Susan Evans , Increasing Audience Involvement with Mass Communication (Los Angeles: Annenberg School of Communication, 1989).

14.

14. Office of Technology Assessment , Linking for Learning, p. 14.

15.

15. For a summary of many research studies, see Wilbur Schramm , Big Media, Little Media (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1977).

16.

16. See, for example, Frederick Williams , The Communications Revolution (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982), pp. 215-226.

17.

17. For a review of these implementation problems, see Martin Elton and John Carey , Implementing Interactive Telecommunication Services (New York: Alternate Media Center, 1981).

18.

18. John Carey , An Evaluation of Learning Link and Edison (Washington, DC: Corporation for Public Broadcasting, 1989).

19.

19. Terry Branstad , Governor of Iowa, “Condition of the State” (Speech delivered to the 73rd General Assembly, Des Moines, IA, 10 Jan. 1989).

20.

20. Governor Campbell is cited in A Public Telecommunications Initiative for American Education (Washington, DC: Corporation for Public Broadcasting, 1990), p. 6.

21.

21. Office of Technology Assessment , Linking for Learning, p. 15.

22.

22. National Commission on Excellence in Education , A Nation at Risk (Washington, DC: Department of Education, 1983).