Japan,an Imminent Hegemon?

Abstract

Japan has been thrust into a leading role in world affairs by its own economic success and by the confluence of two powerful global trends: (1) hegemonic cycles that anticipate the rise of a new hegemon as a consequence of the relative decline of the United States, and (2) the end of history itself, which revolutionizes the meaning of hegemony and international order. Japan's hegemonic qualifications are examined with respect to economic resources by which to finance hegemony and its ability and will to lead the world. Japanese-style hegemony is inferred from the known characteristics of government-business relations in Japan and evaluated in the context of U.S.-Japanese relations. It is concluded that the Pax Americana is hardly dead and that Japan finds it more advantageous to fit into modified American hegemony than to go it alone by replacing America as a new hegemon.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Immanuel Wallerstein , The Politics of the World-Economy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984), p. 42.

2. Ibid., pp. 42-43.

3. Paul Kennedy , The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, Lexington Books, 1987).

4. C. P. Kindleberger , “International Public Goods without International Government,” American Economic Review, 76(1):1-13 (Mar. 1986).

5. Francis Fukuyama , “The End of History?” National Interest, Summer 1989, pp. 3-18.

6. Ibid., p. 18.

7. Kindleberger , “International Public Goods.”

8. Robert Gilpin with the assistance of Jean M. Gilpin , The Political Economy of International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987), p. 90.

Robert M. Orr, Jr. , The Emergence of Japan's Foreign Aid Power (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990).

10.

10. Martin Tolchin and Susan Tolchin , Buying into America: How Foreign Money Is Changing the Face of Our Nation (New York: Berkeley Books, 1989).

11.

11. Jean-Jacques Servan-Schreiber , The American Challenge, trans. Ronald Steel (New York: Atheneum, 1968).

12.

12. Tolchin and Tolchin , Buying into America.

13.

Peter Wickens , The Road to Nissan (London: Macmillan, 1987).

14.

14. Masahiko Aoki , “Toward an Economic Model of the Japanese Firm,” Journal of Economic Literature, 28(1):1-27 (Mar. 1990).

15.

15. The term “japanization,” which no doubt alarmingly exaggerates Japanese influences, received its first extensive analyses in Britain's Industrial Relations Journal, 19(1), Special Issue on Japanization of British Industry (Spring 1988).

16.

16. Hollerman , Japan's Economic Strategy in Brazil.

17.

17. Gilpin with the assistance of Gilpin , Political Economy of International Relations.

18.

18. Minoru Morita , Keizai taikoku no kessei [Political failures of a great economic power] (Tokyo: Nihon Hyoronsha, 1989), pp. 222-233.

19.

19. Koji Watanabe, “Chūkan hōkoku torimatome kōshō wo oete” [Having done the negotiations over the “Interim Report”], interview by Mitoji Yabunaka, Gaikō forum [Foreign affairs forum], May 1990, no. 20, p. 26.

20.

20. Ibid., p. 28.

21.

21. Takeshi Igarashi, “Nichibei kōzō kyōgi no imi towa nanika” [What is the meaning of SII?], Gaikō forum [Foreign affairs forum], Apr. 1990, no. 19, pp. 14-23.

22.

22. Gilpin with the assistance of Gilpin , Political Economy of International Relations, pp. 336-339.

23.

23. John H. Makin and Donald C. Hellmann , eds., Sharing World Leadership? (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1989), p. 241.