Intergenerational family relations in China, Japan, and South Korea are changing. Multigenerational coresidence and dominance of patrilineal relations are declining. In some ways, the diffusion of so-called Western values and practices that are in conflict with Confucian ideals parallels the earlier process of the Confucianization of Japan and Korea. The demographic changes that are influencing families are new, however, and East Asians of the future will have fewer but longer-lasting kinship relations. At the same time, population aging and the expected declining role of the family in elder care are causing growing concern among policymakers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Maurice Freedman, ed., Family and Kinship in Chinese Society (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1970).
2.
Takao Sofue , “Family and Interpersonal Relationships in Early Japan,” in Religion and the Family in East Asia, ed. George A. De Vos and Takao Sofue (Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 1984), p. 219.
3.
3. Martina Deuchler, “The Tradition: Women during the Yi Dynasty,” in Virtues in Conflict: Tradition and the Korean Woman Today, ed. Sandra Mattielli (Seoul: Samhwa, 1977), p. 8.
4.
4. Kwang Kyu Lee, “Family and Religion in Traditional and Contemporary Korea,” in Religion and the Family in East Asia, ed. De Vos and Sofue, p. 187.
5.
Makoto Atoh , “Changes in Family Patterns in Japan” (Paper delivered at the Seminar on Theories of Family Change, sponsored by the International Union for Scientific Study of Population, Tokyo, 29 Nov.-2 Dec. 1988), fn. 7.
6.
6. Arthur P. Wolf, “Chinese Family Size: A Myth Revitalized,” in The Chinese Family and Its Ritual Behavior, ed. Jih-Chang Hsieh and Ying-Chang Chuang (Taipei: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, 1985), p. 35.
7.
7. Jai-Seuk Choi, “Comparative Study on the Traditional Families in Korea, Japan and China,” in Families in East and West, ed. Reuben Hill and Rene Konig (Paris: Mouton, 1970), p. 207.
8.
8. Ibid., p. 203.
9.
9. Harumi Befu, “Corporate Emphasis and Patterns of Descent in the Japanese Family,” in Japanese Culture: Its Development and Characteristics, ed. Robert J. Smith and Richard K. Beardsley (Chicago: Aldine, 1962), p. 34.
10.
10. Michael Palmer, “The People's Republic of China: Some General Observations on Family Law,”Journal of Family Law, 25(1): 48-54 (1987).
11.
11. Kay Ann Johnson, Women, the Family and Peasant Revolution in China (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983), pp. 200-201.
12.
12. Palmer, “People's Republic of China,” pp. 55-68.
13.
13. Robert J. Smith, “Gender Inequality in Contemporary Japan,”Journal of Japanese Studies, 13(1):12-13 (1987).
14.
14. Toshi Kii, “Status Changes of the Elderly in Japan's Legal, Family, and Economic Institutions,” in The Situation of the Asian/Pacific Elderly, ed. Charlotte Nusberg and Masako M. Osako (Washington, DC: International Federation on Ageing, 1981), p. 70.
15.
15. Deuchler, “The Tradition,” pp. 43-44.
16.
Maxine Weinsteinet al. , “Household Composition, Extended Kinship, and Reproduction in Taiwan: 1965-1985” (Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Baltimore, MD, 1989), p. 8, tab. 5.
17.
17. Yi Zeng, “Changes in Family Structure in China: A Simulation Study,”Population and Development Review, 12(4):675-703.
18.
Mainichi Newspapers and Nihon University, 1988 Japanese National Family Survey, unpublished data.
19.
19. David Plath, “ `Ecstasy Years'—Old Age in Japan,”Pacific Affairs, 46(3):428 (1973).
20.
20. Atoh, “Changes in Family Patterns in Japan,” p. 35.
21.
21. H. Yuan Tien and Che-fu Lee, “New Demographics and Old Designs: The Chinese Family amid Induced Population Transition,”Social Science Quarterly, 69(3):615 (Sept. 1988).
22.
22. Linda G. Martin, “The Graying of Japan,”Population Bulletin, 44(2):14 (June 1989).
23.
23. Atoh, “Changes in Family Patterns in Japan,” p. 36.
24.
24. Daisaku Maeda, “The Role of Families in the Care of the Elderly” (Paper delivered at the United Nations Conference on Population Aging in the Context of Urbanization, Sendai, Japan, Sept. 1988), tab. 2.
25.
25. Martin, “Graying of Japan,” p. 15.
26.
26. Martin and Tsuya, “Interactions of Middle-Aged Japanese,” p. 21.
27.
27. Susan De Vos and Yean-Ju Lee, “Change in Extended Family Living among the Elderly in South Korea, 1970-1980” (CDE Working Paper no. 88-43, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1988).
28.
28. National Bureau of Statistics, Social Indicators in Korea 1988 (Seoul: Economic Planning Board, 1989), p. 276.
29.
29. Tamara K. Hareven, “Reflections on Family Research in the People's Republic of China,”Social Research, 54(4):676 (Winter 1987).
31. Lolagene C. Coombs and Te-Hsiung Sun, “Familial Values in a Developing Society: A Decade of Change in Taiwan,”Social Forces, 59(4):1241 (June 1981).
32.
32. Linda G. Martin, “The Aging of Asia,”Journal of Gerontology: Social Science, 43(4):S110 (July 1988).
33.
33. Maeda, “Role of Families,” p. 17.
34.
34. S. Philip Morgan and Kiyosi Hirosima, “The Persistence of Extended Family Residence in Japan: Anachronism or Alternative Strategy?”American Sociological Review, 48:270 (Apr. 1983).
35.
35. Takashi Koyama, “Rural-Urban Comparison of Kinship Relations in Japan,” in Families in East and West, ed. Hill and Konig, pp. 318-337.
36.
36. Martin and Tsuya, “Interaction of Middle-Aged Japanese,” p. 31.
37.
37. Kiyomi Morioka, “Ancestor Worship in Contemporary Japan: Continuity and Change,” in Religion and the Family in East Asia, ed. De Vos and Sofue, p. 206.
38.
Deborah Davis-Friedmann , Long Lives: Chinese Elderly and the Communist Revolution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983), p. 59.
39.
39. Susan Greenhalgh, “Networks and Their Nodes: Urban Society on Taiwan,”China Quarterly, 99:551 (1984).
