What Can Economics Learn from East Asian Success?

Abstract

Most economics literature on East Asian industrialization falls victim to the assumption that only those features of economic policy consistent with neoclassical principles could have contributed to good economic performance. Explanations of good performance accordingly ignore nonneoclassical features. This article suggests that new insights can be gained by carefully examining what these governments actually did. We find that much of what they did is consistent with the principles of old-style pre- 1970 development economics. In particular, they gave central attention to ways of augmenting and directing the composition of investment, and much less attention to ways of increasing efficiency of resource use. They used protection as an instrument to enhance innovation and international competitiveness. In important industries they regulated both quantities and prices so as to achieve government-selected goals, preventing those parts of the economy from being guided by international prices. Economics has much to learn by embracing such nonneoclassical facts and seeking to build a theory to accommodate them.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

For more complete citations to material relevant to the present article, the reader is referred to Robert Wade , Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, forthcoming).

idem , Governing the Market.

3. Deepak Lal , The Poverty of Development Economics, Hobart Paper 16 (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1983), pp. 27-28.

4. Bela Balassa , The Newly Industrializing Countries in the World Economy (Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, 1981), pp. 16-17.

5. World Bank , World Development Report 1987 (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1987).

6. Ian Little , “An Economic Reconnaissance,” in Economic Growth and Structural Change in Taiwan: The Postwar Experience of the Republic of China, ed. W. Galenson (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1979), pp. 474, 480.

7. Hugh Patrick , “The Future of the Japanese Economy: Output and Labor Productivity,” Journal of Japanese Studies, 3(2): 239 (Summer 1977).

8. Frederik Berger , “Korea's Experience with Export-Led Industrial Development,” in Export Promotion Policies, Staff Working Paper 313, ed. B. de Vries (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1979), p. 64.

9. Edward Chen , Hyper-Growth in Asian Economies: A Comparative Study of Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan (New York: Macmillan, 1979), p. 41.

10.

Alexander Gerschenkron , Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962).

11.

11. Simon Kuznets , Modern Economic Growth (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966).

12.

12. Shahid Yusuf and Kyle Peters , “Is Capital Accumulation the Key to Economic Growth? Neoclassical Models and Development Economics on Korea's Investment Policies,” mimeo (Washington, DC: World Bank, East Asia Programs Department, Nov. 1984).

13.

13. P. Romer , “Crazy Explanations for the Productivity Slowdown,” Macroeconomics Annual, 2:163-202 (1987).

14.

14. Jagdish Bhagwati , “Rethinking Trade Strategy,” in Development Strategies Reconsidered, ed. J. Lewis and V. Kallab (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1986), p. 93.

15.

15. Bela Balassa et al. , Development Strategies in Semi-Industrial Economies (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982).

16.

16. Richard Luedde-Neurath , Import Controls and Export-Oriented Development: A Reassessment of the South Korean Case (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1986).

17.

Shoh-chieh Tsiang and Wen Lang Chen , “Developments towards Trade Liberalization in Taiwan” (Paper delivered at the Joint Conference on the Industrial Policies of the ROC and the ROK, Chung-hua Institution for Economic Research, Taipei, 1984).

18.

18. C.H. Tu and W.T. Wang , “Trade Liberalization in the Republic of China on Taiwan” (Paper delivered at the Joint Conference on the Industrial Policies of the ROC and the ROK, Korea Development Institute, Seoul, 1988).

19.

19. Max Corden , Trade Policy and Economic Welfare (New York: Oxford University Press, 1974).

20.

20. Luedde-Neurath , Import Controls and Export-Oriented Development.

21.

21. See Wade , Governing the Market.