Analysis and Reanalysis of Shared Scientific Data

Abstract

Enormous strides in data handling and in telecommunications technology have made possible multiple access and sharing of data files. Sharing of research data often is resisted, however, because of (1) potential loss of monetary, political, or psychological reward; (2) potential conflict and disagreement; and (3) potential exposure of extreme bias or fraud. Found acceptable have been (1) the distribution of very large data files for further study, such as Public Use Tapes from the Bureau of the Census or the National Center for Health Statistics; and (2) the use of large data aggregates that serve as very comprehensive catalogs, such as bibliographic files for literature searches. Instances of scientist-to-scientist data sharing depend on individual arrangements. There are, however, many recorded instances of refusal to give access to data. Data that are liable to lead to conflict or controversy seem to be shared only if they fall within the realm of Freedom of Information legislation or court orders.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. James N. Danziger et al. , Computers and Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1982).

2. Michael R. Williams , A History of Computing Technology (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1985).

3. Theodor D. Sterling , Seymour V. Pollack , and James J. Weinkam , “Measuring the Effect of Air Pollution on Urban Morbidity,” Archives of Environmental Health, 18:485 (Apr. 1969).

4. Elia M. Sterling et al. , “Building Performance Database,” 10th CIB Congress (Washington, DC: International Council for Building Research, Studies and Documentation, in press).

S. J. Ceci , “Scientists Attitude toward Data Sharing” (Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Chicago, IL, 17 Feb. 1987).

Theodor D. Sterling , “Scientific Data: Public or Private,” Science, 177:651 (1972).

7. S. J. Ceci and E. Walker , “Private Archives and Public Needs,” American Psychologist, 38:414 1983).

8. S. J. Ceci , “Scientists Attitude toward Data Sharing.”

9. Jeffrey Masson , The Assault on Truth (Toronto: Collins, 1984).

10.

10. Aaron Blair et al. , “Mortality among Industrial Workers Exposed to Formaldehyde,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 76(6):1071 (June 1986).

11.

11. Theodor D. Sterling and James J. Weinkam, “Reanalysis of a National Cancer Institute Study on `Mortality among Industrial Workers Exposed to Formaldehyde,' ” Report to l'Office de protection du consommateur of the Province of Quebec (submitted for publication, 1987).

12.

12. Federal Register, 29 CFR Part 1910, Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde 51, No. 239 (12 Dec. 1986), 44796.

13.

13. Theodor Sterling and James J. Weinkam , “What Happens When Major Errors Are Discovered Long after an Important Report Has Been Published?” (Talk delivered at the annual meeting of the American Statistical Association, Washington, DC, 16 Aug. 1979).

14.

14. B. J. Yolles , J. C. Connors , and S. Grufferman , “Obtaining Access to Data from Government-Sponsored Medical Research,” New England Journal of Medicine, 315(26):1669 (Dec. 1986).

15.

15. S. E. Fienberg , M. E. Martin , and M. L. Straf , eds., Sharing Research Data (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985).