Neighborhood Education,Mobilization,and Organization for Juvenile Crime Prevention

Abstract

From 1981 to 1986, a federally sponsored research and development program to prevent violent juvenile crime was implemented through neighborhood-based organizations in the Bronx, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, New Orleans, and San Diego. Its goal was to reduce such crime in specific locations through resident mobilization to strengthen neighborhood cohesion and make local institutions more responsive. A conceptual framework was based on social control and learning theories. Each local version of the program involved an ongoing needs assessment through which neighborhood resident councils planned and revised their efforts. Each local program was required to include violent-crisis intervention, mediation, family support networking, and youth skills development. After 36 months of planning and implementation, serious juvenile crime decreased in three of the six target neighborhoods, compared to their respective cities. Most of the programs developed means of financial support to carry on all or part of the effort after federal funding ended. Community-led programs that emphasize advocacy and institutional mediation appear to be more effective than traditional social services in mobilizing residents to prevent juvenile crime and violence.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Dennis P. Rosenbaum , “The Problem of Crime Control,” in Community Crime Prevention: Does It Work? ed. D. P. Rosenbaum (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1986).

2. J. David Hawkins and Joseph G. Weis , “The Social Development Model: An Integrated Approach to Delinquency Prevention,” Journal of Primary Prevention, 6(2): 73-97 (1985).

3. Travis Hirschi , Causes of Delinquency (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).

4. Rand Conger , “Juvenile Delinquency: Behavior Restraint or Behavior Facilitation?” in Understanding Crime: Current Theory and Research, ed. T. Hirschi and M. Gottfredson (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1980).

5. Hawkins and Weis , “Social Development Model.”

6. Jeffrey Fagan , Elizabeth S. Piper , and Melinda Moore , “Violent Delinquents and Urban Youth,” Criminology, 24(3): 439-472 (1986).

7. The House of Umoja as pioneered in such gang-conflict resolution. See David Fattah , “The House of Umoja as a Case Study for Social Change,” this issue of The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

8. Delbert S. Elliott and David Huizinga , The Relationship between Delinquent Behavior and Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Problems, National Youth Survey Report No. 26 (Boulder: University of Colorado, Behavioral Research Institute, 1984).

9. Joan McDermott and Michael Hindelay , Juvenile Criminal Behavior in the United States: Its Trends and Patterns (Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 1981).

10.

10. Anthony Sorrentino , Organizing against Crime: Redeveloping the Neighborhood (New York: Human Sciences Press, 1977), p. 209.