Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Forces following World War II caused a flow of industrial jobs to the suburbs, trapping a central-city minority population unable to compete for the office jobs remaining. Service jobs primarily for the women and a welfare system unwilling to support male-headed families contributed to family breakup. A variety of programs were introduced in response, but the better they worked the worse conditions became because the successful joined the flow to the suburbs. The result is a dual economy with a modern sector staffed by commuting expatriates overlaid on a native population basically unconnected to the city's economy. Since there are already more jobs than residents in the central city, economic development is largely irrelevant to them. The challenge is to bring the residents into the heart of the city's economy, yet create an environment that will encourage the successful to stay.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Vernon Briggs and Marta Tienda , Immigration: Issues and Policies (Salt Lake City, UT: Olympus, 1985), p. 3.

2. Robert Taggart , The Fisherman's Guide: An Assessment of Training and Remediation Strategies (Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1981), p. 81.

3. Ibid., pp. 59-62.

4. William J. Donovan , “High Tech Overrated as Driving Force of Bay State Economy,” New England Business, 7(7):45 (15 Apr. 1984).

5. Edward J. Malecki , “High Technology and Local Economic Development,” Journal of the American Planning Association, 50(3) (Summer 1984).

6. Candace Campbell , “Hatching Small Businesses,” Planning, 50(5) (May 1984).

7. Ibid.

8. U.S., Congress, Joint Economic Committee , The Program for Better Jobs and Income: A Guide and A Critique, 95th Cong., 1st sess., 1977.

9. Manpower Development and Research Corp. , “Welfare: The Impact of the Reagan Administration on Employment and Training” (Paper delivered at a conference sponsored by the National Council on Employment Policy, Washington, DC, 17 June 1983).

10.

10. Garth Mangum and Stephen Seninger , “Central City Employment Opportunity Study” (Report submitted to the Office of Program Planning and Evaluation, Community Service Administration, by the University of Utah Research Institute, 1981).

11.

11. Andrew Hahn and Robert Lerman , What Works in Youth Employment Policy (Washington, DC: National Planning Association, 1981), p. 76.

12.

12. Taggart , Fisherman's Guide, pp. 140-141.

13.

13. Excerpts from remarks by William Spring, vice-president for community affairs, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, given at the National Center for Research and Vocational Education, Columbus, OH, Oct. 1985.

14.

14. Ralph Widner and Associates , “Establishing a High School Academy Program” (Report to the Center for Corporate Public Involvement of the American Council of Life Insurance and Health Insurance Association of America, Washington, DC, 1985).

15.

15. Paula Duggan , Preparing for Employment: Basic Skills and Summer Jobs (Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, forthcoming).

16.

16. Sar Levitan and Garth Mangum , eds., The T in CETA (Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1981), pp. 340-341.

17.

17. Paul Flaim and Ellen Sehgal , “Displaced Workers of 1979-83: How Well Have They Fared?” Monthly Labor Review, pp. 3-16 (June 1985).

18.

18. Business Week, 28 Jan. 1985, p. 76.

19.

19. Stephen Mangum and Patrick Leung , “The PREP-Ohio Training Program: A Six Month Review” (Report to the Ohio Bureau of Employment Services, 1985).

20.

20. Paula Duggan , Developing Adult Basic Skills for Employment (Washington, DC: North-east-Midwest Institute Center for Regional Policy, 1985).

Human Renewal in the Revitalization of the Industrial City

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References