The University and Its Community: Past and Present

Abstract

The history of university-community relations in this century has been characterized by periods of optimism and innovative action followed by disillusionment. During the years when cities were rapidly growing as a result of immigration and migration from the countryside, academics contributed to the search for solutions to urban problems and played a major role in the Progressive Movement. After World War I, research became increasingly esoteric, its focus shifting to national and international issues, until, with the sixties, efforts to find accommodations with a restive local community spawned a wide variety of new programs. The advent of technology appeared to satisfy needs for both research and jobs, but it also produced new frictions. In the present decade, new models for partnership and cooperation have evolved and community involvement has been linked more closely with the educational mission of the university. The hope is that a new spirit of optimism derived from the results of academically based public service will promote lasting progress. Ways must be found to institutionalize achieved goals that mutually benefit the urban university and its neighboring community.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Derek Bok , Beyond the Ivory Tower: Social Responsibilities of the Modern University (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982), p. 3.

2. U.S. Com. Ed., Report, 1889-90, quoted in Lawrence R. Veysey, The Emergence of the American University (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965), pp. 13-14.

3. Bok , Beyond the Ivory Tower, p. 3.

4. Clark Kerr , The Uses of the University (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982), pp. 29-35.

5. Dorothy Ross , “American Social Science and the Idea of Progress,” in The Authority of Experts, ed. Thomas L. Haskell (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984), pp. 165-166.

Steven J. Diner , A City and Its Universities: Public Policy in Chicago, 1892-1919 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980), p. 179.

7. Simon N. Patten , The Making of Economic Literature, Publications of the American Economic Association, 3d ser., 10(1, 8) (1908).

8. Martin Meyerson and Dilys Pegler Winegrad , Gladly Learn and Gladly Teach: Franklin and His Heirs at the University of Pennsylvania 1740-1976 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978), p. 149.

9. J. Martin Klotsche , The Urban University and the Future of Our Cities (New York: Harper & Row, 1966), p. 52.

10.

Arnold B. Grobman and Janet S. Sanders , Interactions between Public Urban Universities and Their Cities: A Report of the Division of Urban Affairs of the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges (Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges, 1984).

11.

Thomas P. Murphy and James Zarnowiecki , “The Urban Observatory: A University-City Research Venture,” in Universities in the Urban Crisis, ed. Thomas P. Murphy (New York: Dunellen, 1975), pp. 17-18.

12.

12. George E. Spear , “The University Public Service Mission,” in Universities in the Urban Crisis, ed. Murphy , pp. 95-96.

13.

Peter Szantan , Not Well Advised (New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Ford Foundation, 1981), pp. 17-18.

14.

14. U.S., Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Organization for Social and Technical Innovation , Urban Universities: Rhetoric, Reality, and Conflict, 1970, p. 20.

15.

15. “Urban Studies and the University: The Ford Foundation Experience” (Address delivered at the Conference of the Office of Urban Affairs, American Council on Education, New Orleans, LA, 5 Apr. 1974), p. 10.

16.

16. Technology, Innovation, and Regional Economic Development (Washington, DC: Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1984), p. 28.

17.

17. Randall M. Whaley , “A Case Study of the University City Science Center” (Paper delivered at the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development's “International Conference on Higher Education and the Community: New Partnerships and Interaction,” Paris, 4-6 Feb. 1980).

18.

18. Washington, DC: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1981, passim.

19.

19. Center for Educational Research and Innovation , The University and the Community: The Problems of Changing Relationships (Paris: Orgazation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1982), pp. 35-46.