Cities in Transition

Abstract

The local industry mix provides the conventional framework within which a city's economic position and prospects are evaluated and its redevelopment is planned. The industrial approach has been complemented here with an occupational-functional approach that measures the comparative advantage—competitive position—of a given urban area along five broad paths of economic development: entrepreneurship, central management, research and development, precision operations, and routine operations. Looking beyond the products a city makes to the roles it plays and the skills it performs shifts the emphasis from the immediate fortunes of a given industry and the direct flow of current income to the long-run power and potential of local resources, especially human resources. This new perspective is also more sensitive to state and local public policy, and illustrations are provided of the ways in which educational and other strategies have been used implicitly and could be planned more explicitly to guide cities through these most difficult years of industrial transition.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

idem , “Alternative Paths to the Revival of Industrial Cities,” in Winter Cities, ed. Gary Gappert (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1986).

2. Thompson and Thompson , “Alternative Paths.”

3. Philip R. Thompson , “Toward an Economic-Topographic Map of Ohio,” Ohio Economic Trends Review (in press).

4. Wilbur R. Thompson , “Economic Aptitude Tests: From Local Prescription to National Expertise” (Installation address, Albert A. Levin Chair in Urban Studies and Public Service, College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, 18 Oct. 1985), p. 9.

5. Wilbur R. Thompson , “Aging Industries and Cities: Times and Tides in the Northeast,” in Revitalizing the Northeast, ed. George S. Sternlieb and James W. Hughes (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research, 1978), pp. 149-150.

6. Wilbur R. Thompson , “Economic Aptitude Tests,” p. 11.