Populations,Practices,and Problems in Forensic Psychiatric Facilities

Abstract

This is a study of the public facilities to which mentally disordered offenders are committed or transferred so that they may be securely confined while simultaneously participating in programs designed for treatment of their mental disorders. The study focuses principally on the nature and characteristics of these facilities: their patient populations, staff, security conditions, treatment programs, and operational programs. We identified and surveyed 231 facilities. The information from the survey, legal research, and site visits to 11 programs has been integrated and used to address four major issues: the types of facilities mentally disordered offenders are institutionalized in for treatment of their mental disorders; the legal, diagnostic, and demographic characteristics of the residents of these facilities; the forms of treatment and levels of staffing available in these facilities; and the common problems faced by facility administrators with respect to facility management, treatment, and release decisions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

William C. Eckerman , A Nationwide Survey of Mental Health and Correctional Institutions for Adult Mentally Disordered Offenders, National Institute of Mental Health, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare pub. no. (HSM) 73-9018 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1972).

2. Scheidemandel and Kanno , Mentally Ill Offender.

3. Eckerman , Nationwide Survey of Mental Health and Correctional Institutions.

4. Robert B. Sheldon and William Barry Norman , “Comprehensive Survey of Forensic Psychiatric Facilities in the United States,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 4:93-104 (1978).

5. Henry J. Steadman et al.

“Mentally Disordered Offenders: A National Survey of Patients and Facilities,”

Law and Human Behavior, 6:31-38 (1982).

6. Scheidemandel and Kanno , Mentally Ill Offender.

7. Eckerman , Nationwide Survey of Mental Health and Correctional Institutions, p. 29.

8. Seymour Halleck , The Mentally Disordered Offender (Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, forthcoming).

9. Judith Resnick and Nancy Shaw , “Prisoners of Their Sex: Health Problems of Incarcerated Women,” in Prisoners' Rights Sourcebook, ed. I. P. Robbins (New York: Clark Boardman, 1980), p. 324.

10.

10. Scheidemandel and Kanno , Mentally Ill Offender, p. 1.

11.

11. Steadman et al. , “Mentally Disordered Offenders: A National Survey,” pp. 31-38.

12.

12. Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972).

13.

13. Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480 (1980).

14.

14. Scheidemandel and Kanno , Mentally Ill Offender, p. 48.

15.

15. Eckerman , Nationwide Survey of Mental Health and Correctional Institutions, p. 45.

16.

16. David Wexler , Civil Commitments and Dangerous Mental Patients: Legal Issues of Confinement, Treatment, and Release, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare pub. no. (ADM) 77-331 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1976), p. 48.

17.

17. Ibid., p. 54 (italics in original).

18.

18. See Jeffrey L. Rogers , Joseph D. Bloom , and Spero M. Manson , “Oregon's Psychiatric Security Review Board: A Comprehensive System for Managing Insanity Acquittees,” this issue of The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

19.

19. Charlotte A. Kerr and Jeffrey A. Roth , with Thomas F. Courtless and Elyce Zenoff , Survey of Facilities and Programs for Mentally Disordered Offenders: Final Report (Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, forthcoming).