Indexing Civil Commitment in Psychiatric Emergency Rooms

Abstract

A reliable prototype index, Three Ratings of Involuntary Admissibility (TRIAD), was developed to reflect the way psychiatric emergency room clinicians apply legal criteria for involuntary commitment. The interrater reliability coefficients—Pearson's r—of the TRIAD system for rating patients are 0.94, danger-to-self score; 0.89, danger-to-others score; 0.77, grave-disability score; and 0.89, total-admissibility score. TRIAD scores accounted for 82 percent of 89 disposition decisions in two metropolitan county hospital psychiatric emergency rooms. Study results indicate that (1) psychiatric emergency room clinicians shared constructs of danger to self, danger to others, and grave disability; (2) these constructs are reliably applied in actual cases; (3) TRIAD is a valid reflection of these constructs; and (4) case disposition is predictable from the severity of the patient's status with regard to these criteria.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Bruce J. Ennis and Thomas R. Litwack , “Psychiatry and the Presumption of Expertise: Flipping Coins in the Courtroom,” California Law Review, 62:693-752 (1974).

2. See, for example, Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F. Supp. 1078 (E.D. Wisc. 1972), vacated and remanded, 94 Sup. Ct. 713 (1974); O'Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975).

3. Paul R. Friedman and Jane B. Yohalem , “The Rights of the Chronic Mental Patient,” in The Chronic Mental Patient, ed. John A. Talbott (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1978).

4. Paul S. Appelbaum and Robert M. Hamm , “Decision to Seek Commitment,” Archives of General Psychiatry, 39:447-451 (1982).

Arthur T. Meyerson et al. , “Influence of Experience on Major Clinical Decisions: Training Implications,” Archives of General Psychiatry, 36:423-427 (1979).

6. R. Kirkland Schwitzgebel , “Survey of Civil Commitment Statutes,” in Civil Commitment and Social Policy, A. L. McGarry et al. (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1981).

7. “Welfare and Institutions Code,” in West's Annotated California Codes (St. Paul, MN: West, 1980), chap. 2, §5150.

8. Paul D. Lipsitt , “Emergency Admission of Civil Involuntary Patients to Mental Hospitals Following Statutory Modification,” in Civil Commitment and Social Policy, McGarry et al.

9. “Welfare and Institutions Code”§5000-5401.

10.

10. See, for example, ibid., §5008, 5150.

11.

11. R. Kirkland Schwitzgebel and Edwin W. Swensen , Evaluation of Involuntary Care and Treatment under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Sacramento: State of California, Department of Mental Health, 1981).

12.

12. Appelbaum and Hamm , “Decision to Seek Commitment.”

13.

Meyerson et al. , “Influence of Experience on Major Clinical Decisions.”

14.

Larry Kirstein et al. , “Utilization Review of Treatment for Suicide Attempts,” American Journal of Psychiatry, 132:22-27 (1975).

15.

15. Roy R. Grinker , “Diagnosis and Schizophrenia,” in Schizophrenic Reactions, ed. Robert Cancro (New York: Brunner / Mazel, 1970).

16.

Andrew E. Slaby , Julian Lieb , and Laurence R. Tancredi , Handbook of Psychiatric Emergencies (New York: Medical Examination, 1975).

17.

17. Meyerson et al. , “Influence of Experience on Major Clinical Decisions.”

18.

Werner M. Mendel and Samuel Rapport , “Determinants of the Decision for Psychiatric Hospitalization,” Archives of General Psychiatry, 20:321-328 (1969).

19.

19. The diagnoses refer to various categories in American Psychiatric Association , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed. (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1980).

20.

20. Ibid.