Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

An obstacle to progress toward major technological change in American industry centers around the industrial manager and prevalent managerial processes. New technology promises a factory of the future with radically better and more challenging jobs and work environments but, in spite of these and major strategic advantages, the rate of investment and change is slow. Case research suggests that decisions to redesign and reequip factories with available new equipment are delayed by detail-centered, cautious managers enmeshed in typical corporate decision-making that focuses on finance rather than strategy. The investment costs and risks in new factory technology are substantially greater than present technology, augmented by the need for closely integrated equipment and information systems. Hence the start-up and debugging problems are formidable, the outcomes are nearly unpredictable, and the behavior of managers unwilling to assume such career risks is therefore altogether rational. This set of factors has outdated not only many present corporate investment decision-making processes but a heretofore successful generation of top industrial managers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Andrew Ure , “The Philosophy of Manufacturers” (1835), in The Philosophy of Manufacturers, ed. Michael Brewster Folsom and Steven D. Lubar (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982), p. 365.

2. Wickham Skinner , “The Anachronistic Factory,” Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb. 1971.

3. “The Factory of the Future: Always in the Future?” in Towards the Factory of the Future, ed. L. Kops (New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1980).

4. W. Abernathy , K. Clark , and A. Kantrow , “The New Industrial Competition,” Harvard Business Review, Sept.-Oct. 1981.

5. Robert Hayes and William Abernathy , “Managing Our Way to Economic Decline,” Harvard Business Review, July-Aug. 1980.

6. Bela Gold , “CAM Sets New Roles for Production,” Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec. 1982.

7. William Abernathy , The Productivity Dilemma (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982); Abernathy, Clark , and Kantrow , “New Industrial Competition”; Hayes and Abernathy , “Managing Our Way”; Frank S. Leonard and W. Earl Sasser , “The Incline of Quality,” Harvard Business Review, Sept.-Oct. 1982; Wickham Skinner , Manufacturing in the Corporate Strategy (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1978); Steven C. Wheelwright , “Integration of Manufacturing Strategy and Business Strategy,” in Manufacturing Trends in the 1980s (New York: Booz, Allen, and Hamilton, 1981).

8. Wickham Skinner , “Productivity Is the Wrong Objective,” Wall Street Journal, 16 Mar. 1982.

9. Wickham Skinner , “Getting Physical: New Strategic Leverage from Operations” (Working paper 83-43, Division of Research, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA).

10.

10. Advanced Production Problems (Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1952).

11.

11. Wickham Skinner , “Manufacturing—Missing Link in Corporate Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, May-June 1969.

12.

12. Wickham Skinner , “The Focused Factory,” Harvard Business Review, May-June 1974.

13.

13. Alfred D. Chandler, Jr. , The Visible Hand (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).

Wanted: Managers for the Factory of the Future

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References