Three major trends affecting family life are an increase in households composed of unrelated persons, an increase in single-parent families, and an increase in divorce. These trends indicate the need for forms of living arrangement other than the traditional nuclear family, especially to confront two major sets of problems faced by many mid-life women: economic and socioemotional. Two prototype living arrangements—“families”—are proposed: (1) adaptation of the concept of the halfway house and (2) utilization of a cooperative living arrangement that has operated successfully with older persons. Since these prototypes have been somewhat successful in dealing with primary group environments of the young and the elderly, such models might be adapted on an experimental basis for midlife women who need added social supports and an increased array of choices from which to plan new directions in their lives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. See Arnold L. Gennep, Les Rites de Passage (Paris: E. Nourry, 1909).
2.
2. See Marjorie Fiske Lowenthal, Majda Thurher, David Chiriboga, Four Stages of Life (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975).
3.
3. See Douglas C. Kimmel, Adulthood and Aging, 2nd ed. (New York: John Wiley, 1980); see Daniel J. Levinson, The Seasons of a Man's Life (New York: Knopf, 1978); Bernice L. Neugarten, “The Awareness of Middle Age,” in Middle Age and Aging, ed. Bernice L. Neugarten (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968), pp. 93-98; Bernice L. Neugarten and Gunhild O. Hagestad, “Age and The Life Course,” in Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, eds. Robert H. Binstock and Ethel Shanas (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1976), pp. 35-55; see Gail Sheehy, Passages: Predictable Crises of Adult Life (New York: Dutton, 1976); see George E. Vaillant, Adaptation to Life (Boston: Little, Brown).
4.
4. Glen H. Elder, Jr., “Approaches to Social Change and the Family,” in Turning Points: Historical and Sociological Essays on the Family, (Supplement to American Journal of Sociology, vol. 84), eds. John Demos and Sarane Spence Boocock (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978), p. S5.
5.
5. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 367, “Households and Families by Type: March 1981 (Advance Report)” (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, Oct. 1981), p. 1.
6.
6. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 365, “Marital Status and Living Arrangements: Mar. 1980” (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1981), p. 4.
7.
7. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P-23, No. 111, “Social and Economic Characteristics of Americans During Midlife” (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, June 1981), p. 3.
8.
8. Steve W. Rawlings, Current Population Reports, Series P-23, No. 107, “Family Maintenance by Female Householders 1970-1979” (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office), p. 5.
9.
9. Compiled from Table C, U.S. Bureau of the Census, “Marital Status and Living Arrangement p. 3.
10.
10. U.S. Bureau of the Census, “Social and Economic Characteristics of Americans During Mid-Life,” p. 1.
11.
11. Rawlings, “Family Maintenance by Female Householders 1970-1979,” p. 33.
12.
12. U.S. Bureau of the Census, “Social and Economic Characteristics of Americans During Mid-life,” p. 9.
13.
13. U.S. Bureau of the Census, “Money Income in 1976 of Families and Persons in the U.S.,”Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 114, Tables 59 and 60 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office).
14.
14. National Commission on the Observance of International Woman's Year, “To Form a More Perfect Union” (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1976), p. 102.
15.
15. R. Brandwein, C. Brown, and E. Fox, “Women and Children Last: The Social Situation of Divorced Mothers and Their Families,”Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36:498-514 (Aug. 1974).
16.
16. Ibid., pp. 498-514.
17.
17. An example of the coordination of these activities is the Maryland Center for Displaced Homemakers. See P. Bujarski-Green, “Starting Over: A Guide for the Displaced Homemaker,”Family Circle (July 1978), pp. 14, 20, 25, 28.
18.
18. J. S. Stevenson, Issues and Crises During Middlescence (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1977); pp. 127-133.
19.
19. S. Gorney and C. Cox, After Forty (New York: Dial, 1973), pp. 140-144.
20.
20. J. Burgess, “The Single Parent Family: A Social and Sociological Problem,”Family Coordinator, 19:137-144 (Apr. 1970).
21.
21. V. Rose and S. Price-Bonham, “Divorce Adjustment: A Woman's Problem?”Family Coordinator, 22:291-297 (July 1973).
22.
22. Gorney and Cox, After Forty, pp. 142.
23.
23. H. Z. Lopata, “The Meaning of Friendship in Widowhood,” in Looking Ahead, eds. L. Troll, J. Israel, and K. Israel (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977), pp. 93-105.
24.
24. Stevenson, Issues and Crises During Middlescence, p. 204.
25.
25. Rose and Price-Bonham, “Divorce Adjustment: A Woman's Problem?” pp. 291-297.
26.
26. Data were collected for this survey by the National Opinion Research Center from a national cross-section sample of U.S. adults aged 18 and over. Data were made available through the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, University of Michigan.
27.
27. L. Walters and B. White, “Helping Each Other,” in Troll, Israel, and Israel (eds.), Looking Ahead, pp. 186-191.
28.
28. Rose and Price Bonham, “Divorce Adjustment: A Woman's Problem?” pp. 291-297.
29.
29. National Institute of Mental Health, Halfway Houses Serving the Mentally Ill, United States, 1973, DHEW Publication No. (ADM) 76-246 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1975), pp. 2-12.
30.
30. Richard Seiteret al., Halfway Houses, Summary Report, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1977).
31.
31. Richard Rachin , “So You Want to Open a Halfway House,” in Community Based Corrections, eds. G. R. Perlstein and T. R. Phelps (Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear, 1975), pp. 161-174.
32.
32. Seiteret al., Halfway Houses.
33.
33. E. E. Miller, “The Halfway House: Correctional Decompression of the Offender,” in Corrections In the Community, eds. E. E. Miller and R. R. Montilla (Reston, VA: Reston, 1977), pp. 211-231.
34.
34. Rachin, “So You Want to Open a Half-way House,” pp. 161-174.
35.
35. Miller, “The Halfway House: Correctional Decompression of the Offender,” pp. 211-231.
36.
36. G. F. Streib, and M. Hilker, “The Cooperative `Family': An Alternative Lifestyle for the Elderly,”Alternative Lifestyles, 3:167-184 (May 1980).
