Definitions of terrorism are imprecise and difficult. Even the units of analysis are not uniform, and existing typologies are merely descriptive. Forecasting, however, particularly middle-and long-range, would improve if we could provide a valid theoretical formulation. This would have to be interdisciplinary and should encompass both the idioverse of the terrorist and the universe of the terrorist events. Psychiatric contributions are few and they lack general validity. Violence and death wishes, which translate into fantasy war, are generally accepted characteristics. Four theories are briefly discussed: (1) frustration-aggression, (2) unbalance of the social system, (3) Olson's rational choice, and (4) Marxist theory. A subcultural approach would allow consideration of group and individual factors and would permit some valid policy choices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. G. Pontara, “Violenza e Terrorismo: il Problema della Definizione e della Giustificazione,” in Dimensioni del Terrorismo Politico, ed. L. Bonanate (Milan: Franco Angeli, 1979), pp. 25-98.
2.
and J. F. Kirkham, S. Levy, and W. J. Crofty, Assassination and Political Violence, Vol. 8 of a report to the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1969).
3.
3. B. McClure, The Dynamics of Terrorism (Washington, DC: International Association of Chiefs of Police, 1976).
4.
4. Among the many studies of future terrorist strategy, the following are some of the most often quoted: B. M. Jenkins, “International Terrorism: A New Mode of Conflict,” in International Terrorism and World Security, eds. O. Carlton and C. Schaerf (New York: Halsted Press, 1975), pp. 13-49; B. M. JenkinsHigh Technology Terrorism and Surrogate War: The Impact of New Technology on Low-Level Violence, P-5339 (Santa Monica: CA: The Rand Corporation, 1975); B. M. Jenkins, Terrorism: Trends and Potentialities (Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation, 1977); R. H. Kupperman and D. Trent, Terrorism: Threat, Reality, Response (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1979); National Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals, Disorders and Terrorism (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 1976); P. Wilkinson, Political Terrorism (London: Macmillan, 1974).
5.
5. T. Sellin and M. E. Wolfgang, The Measurement of Delinquency (New York: John Wiley, 1964).
6.
and W. W. Fowler, An Agenda for Quantitative Research on Terrorism (Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation, 1980).
7.
7. J. M. Gleason, “A Poisson Model of Incidents of International Terrorism in the United States,”Terrorism, 4(1-4):259-265 (1980).
8.
Examples of Italian studies, unpublished, are reported in F. Bruno and F. Ferracuti, “Aggression in Perspective: Italy,” in Global Perspectives on Aggression, eds. A. P. Goldstein and M. Segall (New York: Pergamon Press, forthcoming).
9.
9. B. McClure, The Dynamics of Terrorism, 1976.
10.
and L. Bonanate, “Realta e Miti di un Fenomeno a Piu Varianti,”Politica Internazionale, 11-12:59-67 (1981).
11.
11. A. R. Molnar, Human Factors Considerations of Undergrounds in Insurgencies (Washington, DC: Special Operations Research Office, The American University, 1 December 1965).
12.
12. T. Parsons, “Comment” to L. Gross, “Preface to a Metatheoretical Framework,”American Journal of Sociology, 67:136-140 (Sept. 1961).
13.
13. C. Schrag, “Some Notes on Criminological Theory,” in Conference on Research Planning on Crime and Deliquency, ed. R. Larson (Los Angeles: University of Southern California Youth Studies Center, 1962), p. 2.
14.
14. G. Myrdal, Value and Social Theory: A Selection of Essays on Methodology, ed. P. Streeten (New York: Harper & Row, 1958), p. 236.
15.
and W. W. Deutsch, “Some Prospects for the Future,”Journal of International Affairs, 31(2):315-326 (1977).
16.
For a recent autobiography, see Giorgio, Memorie dalla Clandestinita: un Terrorista Non Pentito Si Racconta (Milan: Savelli, 1981).
17.
D. J. Monti , “The Relation Between Terrorism and Domestic Civil Disorders,”Terrorism, 4(1-4):123-161 (1980).
18.
18. J. Ortegay Gasset, “Sobre la Rebelion de las Masas,” Apendice 11 in La Rebelion de las Masas (Madrid: Revista de Occidente en Alianza Editorial, 1980).
19.
19. A. C. Hazelip, Twelve Tenets of Terrorism: An Assessment of Theory and Practice (Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International, 1980).
20.
20. A. Koestler, quoted by J. C. Davies, “Aggression, Violence, Revolution and War.”
21.
21. F. Ferracuti and F. Bruno, “Psychiatric Aspects of Terrorism in Italy,” in The Mad, the Bad and the Different, eds. I. L. Barak-Glantz and C. R. Huff (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1981).
22.
22. J. C. Davies, “Aggression, Violence, Revolution and War.”
23.
and T. R. Gurr, “The Revolution—Social Change Nexus.”
24.
24. K. Marx, “Wage, Labor and Capital,” in K. Marx and F. Engels, Selected Works in Two Volumes (Moscow: Foreign Language Publishing House, 1949) 1.
25.
25. F. Fanon, quoted by J. C. Davies, “Aggression, Violence, Revolution and War,” p. 245.
26.
26. Sorel, quoted, ibid., p. 245.
27.
27. L. Bonante, Dimensioni del Terrorismo Politico.
28.
28. F. Bruno and F. Ferracuti, “Aggression in Perspective: Italy.”
29.
29. B. Salert, Revolutions and Revolutionaries: Four Theories (New York: Elsevier, 1976).
30.
30. J. M. Olson, The Logic of Collective Action, rev. ed. (New York: Schocken Books, 1971).
31.
and T. R. Gurr, “The Revolution—Social Change Nexus.”
32.
32. J. C. Davies, “Aggression, Violence, Revolution and War.”
33.
33. C. Johnson, Revolutionary Change.
34.
34. K. Marx, “A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy,” in The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. R. C. Tucker (New York: Norton, 1972), pp. 4-5.
35.
35. H. Marcuse, Ragione e Rivoluzione: Hegel e il Sorgere della “Teoria Sociale” (Bologna: Il Mulino, 1965).
36.
36. A. Negri, Il Communismo e la Guerra (Milan: Feltrinelli, 1980).
37.
37. M. E. Wolfgang and F. Ferracuti, The Subculture of Violence (London: Tavistock, 1967).
