Head Start as a National Laboratory

Abstract

Project Head Start was initiated during an optimistic era when many believed that intelligence could be vastly improved through environmental input. This extreme position holds many dangers. The search for the brief periods in development when intervention will yield life-long benefits has also been misleading; all stages of life deserve their own program focus. Head Start has held a unique position as a national laboratory for the design of effective interventions for children and adults. The program has served as a base from which to experiment with various services and approaches such that those found to be successful can be expanded or can spawn related efforts. Ways to improve Head Start's orientation include the admittance of children from all socioeconomic levels and the use of social competence, instead of IQ score changes, as the criterion by which to evaluate the success of early intervention. A promising future direction would be to expand its Child and Family Resource Programs, where arrays of services are offered in one neighborhood center. With adequate funding, the evolution of Head Start is assured, since the program has been flexible, innovative, and a stable foundation from which to move forward in social programs for children and families.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Donald T. Campbell , “Reforms as Experiments,” American Psychologist, 24:409 (Apr. 1969).

2. For an annotated history of this immense social experiment, see Edward Zigler and Jeanette Valentine , eds., Project Head Start: A Legacy of the War on Poverty (New York: Free Press, 1979).

3. Arthur Jensen , “How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?” Harvard Educational Review, 39:2 (Winter 1969).

4. Edward Zigler , “Project Head Start: Success or Failure?” Learning, 1:43-47 (May 1973).

5. J. McV. Hunt , Intelligence and Experience (New York: Ronald Press, 1961).

6. Lyndon B. Johnson , “Remarks on Project Head Start, May 18, 1965,” in Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966).

7. V. G. Cicirelli , The Impact of Head Start: An Evaluation of the Effects of Head Start on Children's Cognitive and Affective Development (Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards, Institute for Applied Technology, 1969).

J. Kagan and R. E. Klein , “Crosscultural Perspectives on Early Development,” American Psychologist 28:947-961 (Nov. 1973).

9. Edward Zigler , “The Environmental Mystique: Training the Intellect versus Development of the Child,” Childhood Education, 46:402-412 (May 1970).

10.

10. Lee Cronbach , “Five Decades of Public Controversy over Mental Testing,” American Psychologist, 30:1-14 (Jan. 1975).

11.

11. Benjamin Bloom , Stability and Change in Human Characteristics (New York: John Wiley, 1964).

12.

12. Burton L. White , The First Three Years of Life (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975).

13.

13. Ann M. Clarke and A.D.B. Clarke , Early Experience: Myth and Evidence (London: Open Books, 1976).

14.

14. A.D.B. Clarke and Ann M. Clarke , “Prospects for Prevention and Amelioration of Mental Retardation: A Guest Editorial,” American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81:523-533 (May 1977).

15.

15. Reviewed by Edward Zigler and Victoria Seitz , “Social Policy Implications of Research on Intelligence,” in Handbook of Human Intelligence, ed. R. J. Sternberg (New York: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).

16.

16. A. M. Rivlin and P. M. Timpane , Planned Variation in Education: Should We Give Up or Try Harder? (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1975).

17.

17. S. L. Schlossman , “The Parent Education Game: The Politics of Child Psychology in the 1970s,” Teacher's College Record, 79:788-808 (1978).

18.

18. M. M. Smith , “CDA: Evolution of a Viable Program,” in Resource Readings for C.D.A. Candiates, ed. L. M. Hatfield and R. Weigand (Indiana Association for Education of Young Children, forthcoming; hereafter cited as CDA).

19.

19. Edward Zigler and Sharon L. Kagan , “The Child Development Associate: Has the 1970 Challenge Been Met?” in Conference Proceedings, CDA Day at NAEYC (Washington, DC: University Research Corporation, 1980), pp. 7-8.

20.

20. Smith , CDA, p. 7.

21.

21. Office of Economic Opportunity, Head Start: A Community Action Program (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968), pp. 2, 4.

22.

22. Edward Zigler and Penelope K. Trickett , “IQ, Social Competence, and Evaluation of Early Childhood Intervention Programs,” American Psychologist, 33:789-798 (Sept. 1978).

23.

23. Reviewed by Victoria Seitz et al. , “Effects of Place of Testing on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Scores of Disadvantaged Head Start and Non-Head Start Children,” Child Development, 46:482 (Jun. 1975).

24.

24. See Deborah Stipek , Jeanette Valentine , and Edward Zigler , “Project Head Start: A Critique of Theory and Practice,” in Zigler and Valentine, Project Head Start, pp. 477-494.

25.

25. Comptroller General of the United States, Report to the Congress: Early Childhood and Family Development Programs Improve the Quality of Life for Low-Income Families, Document no. (HRD) 79-40 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accounting Office, 6 Feb. 1979).

26.

26. Administration for Children, Youth, and Families, Head Start in the 1980's: Review and Recommendations (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981).