Abstract
Approximately eight years ago, following a series of violent and sensational youth crimes, a state agency was given the responsibility to launch an innovative program for troubled adolescents. The manner in which the administra tion viewed its new mandate, the youth-care concepts upon which the programs were based, and the practical, daily opera tional problems experienced in implementing techniques and approaches which departed from tradition are discussed in this article.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
