Abstract
Girls’ math and reading scores declined more than boys’ during the pandemic, but these gender differences varied substantially across communities. Using test score data from roughly 7,000 U.S. school districts, we investigate how local context shaped these patterns. Community socioeconomic resources buffered children against the negative academic consequences of the pandemic, and these protections were substantially stronger for girls than for boys. In high-resource communities, pandemic disruption had little differential effect on girls and boys, while in low-resource communities, disruptions produced larger academic declines for girls than boys. This resulted in gender gaps shifting toward boys on average, but especially in low-resource settings with high levels of community disruption. These patterns suggest that the gendered allocation of resources is shaped by family and community context, perhaps because gender norms—which shape expectations, opportunities, and resource allocation—are more deeply activated in conditions of disruption and resource scarcity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
