People who seek public benefits for their families often struggle to navigate the complicated labyrinth of U.S. safety net programs. We show that states can meaningfully improve access for families in need—even in the absence of significant policy change—by adopting widely used technology and common research practices. Technology and research can be applied to each stage of benefits delivery: outreach, application, and renewal. The suggestions we offer vary in their ease of implementation: some are simple, like sending repeated renewal reminders through as many channels of communication as possible; others are more involved, like bundling together separate program applications. We argue that if states are to succeed at simplifying the enrollment process—and thereby increase the share of eligible people receiving benefits—they can help their own cause by building and maintaining a modern technological infrastructure for data collection and analysis, and then act on what those data reveal.
AhmedSyed M.LemkauJeanne P.NealeighNicholMannBarbara. 2002. Barriers to healthcare access in a non-elderly urban poor American population. Health & Social Care in the Community9 (6): 445–53.
2.
AlmondDouglasHoynesHilary W.SchanzenbachDiane Whitmore. 2011. Inside the war on poverty: The impact of food stamps on birth outcomes. Review of Economics and Statistics93 (2): 387–403.
AtskeSaraPerrin.Andrew2021. Home broadband adoption, computer ownership vary by race, ethnicity in the U.S. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available from https://pewrsr.ch/3Bdn6tW (accessed 22 April 2022).
5.
BadarudeenSameerSabharwalSanjeev. 2010. Assessing readability of patient education materials: Current role in orthopaedics. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research468 (10): 2572–80.
BarnesCarolyn. 2023. “I can’t get ahold of them”: Perceptions of administrative burden and administrative exclusion across SNAP, WIC, and Medicaid during the COVID-19 pandemic. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
BastianJacobMichelmoreKatherine. 2018. The long-term impact of the earned income tax credit on children’s education and employment outcomes. Journal of Labor Economics36 (4): 1127–63.
BhargavaSaurabhManoliDayanand. 2015. Psychological frictions and the incomplete take-up of social benefits: Evidence from an IRS field experiment. American Economic Review105 (11): 3489–3529.
California Statewide Automated Welfare System Consortium IV Joint Powers Authority. 2021. BenefitsCal. Available from https://benefitscal.com (accessed 15 September 2023).
ChettyRajFriedmanJohn N.RockoffJonah E.. 2014. Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review104 (9): 2633–79.
CollyerSophieCurranMegan A.GarfinkelIrwinHarrisDavidParolinZacharyWaldfogelJaneWimerChristopher. 2023. The Child Tax Credit and family well-being: An overview of reforms and impacts. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
CurrieJanet. 2006. The take-up of social benefits. In Poverty, the distribution of income, and public policy, eds. AuerbachAlanCardDavidQuigleyJohn, 80–148. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
31.
CurrieJanetGruberJonathan. 1996. Health insurance eligibility, utilization of medical care, and child health. Quarterly Journal of Economics111 (2): 431–66.
32.
DahlGordon B.LochnerLance. 2012. The impact of family income on child achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit. American Economic Review102 (5): 1927–56.
De La RosaWendySharmaEeshaTullyStephanieGiannellaEricRinoGwen. 2021. Psychological ownership interventions increase interest in claiming government benefits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118 (35): e2106357118.
EvansWilliam N.GarthwaiteCraig L.. 2014. Giving mom a break: The impact of higher EITC payments on maternal health. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy6 (2): 258–90.
GiannellaEricHomonoffTatianaRinoGwenSomervilleJason. 2023. Administrative burden and procedural denials: Experimental evidence from SNAP. NBER Working Paper 31239, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
GoldinJacobHomonoffTatianaJavaidRizwanSchaferBrenda. 2022. Tax filing and take-up: Experimental evidence on tax preparation outreach and benefit claiming. Journal of Public Economics206:104550.
HeinrichCarolyn J.CamachoSayilHendersonSarah ClarkHernándezMónicaJoshiEla. 2021. Consequences of administrative burden for social safety nets that support the healthy development of children. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management41 (1): 11–44.
50.
HerdPamelaMoynihanDonald P.. 2019. Administrative burden: Policymaking by other means. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
51.
HerdPamelaMoynihanDonald P.. 2023. Fewer burdens but greater inequality? Reevaluating the safety net through the lens of administrative burden. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
52.
HomonoffTatianaSomervilleJason. 2021. Program recertification costs: Evidence from SNAP. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy13 (4): 271–98.
53.
HoynesHilaryMillerDouglasSimonDavid. 2015. Income, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and infant health. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy7 (1): 172–211.
54.
HoynesHilaryPageMarianneStevensAnn Huff. 2011. Can targeted transfers improve birth outcomes? Evidence from the introduction of the WIC program. Journal of Public Economics95 (7–8): 813–27.
55.
HoynesHilarySchanzenbachDiane WhitmoreAlmondDouglas. 2016. Long-run impacts of childhood access to the safety net. American Economic Review106 (4): 903–34.
56.
JacksonMargot I.FanelliEster. 2023. Who uses the safety net? Trends in public benefit use among American households with children, 1980–2020. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
ManoliDayTurnerNicholas. 2018. Cash-on-hand and college enrollment: Evidence from population tax data and the Earned Income Tax Credit. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy10 (2): 242–71.
MillsGregoryVerickerTraceyKoballHeatherLippoldKyeWheatonLauraElkin.Sam2014. Understanding the rates, causes, and costs of churning in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) – Final report. Prepared by Urban Institute for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. Available from https://fns-prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPChurning.pdf (accessed 5 December 2022).
64.
Minnesota Department of Human Services, and Minnesota IT Services. 2021. MNbenefits portal. Available from https://mnbenefits.mn.gov (accessed 15 September 2023).
MoynihanDonaldHerdPamelaHarveyHope. 2015. Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory25 (1): 43–69.
SoniAparna. 2020. The effects of public health insurance on health behaviors: Evidence from the fifth year of Medicaid expansion. Health Economics29 (12): 1586–1605.
72.
SwartzKatherineShortPamela FarleyGraefeDeborah RoempkeUberoiNamrata. 2015. Reducing Medicaid churning: Extending eligibility for twelve months or to end of calendar year is most effective. Health Affairs34 (7): 1180–87.
TreuhaftSarahRamillerAlexTanSelenaHoward.Madeline2022. State of waiting: California’s rental assistance program on the eve of expiration. Los Angeles, CA: National Equity Atlas. Available from https://nationalequityatlas.org/CARentalAssistance_20220322 (accessed 22 April 2022).
WolfeBarbaraScrivnerScott. 2005. The devil may be in the details: How the characteristics of SCHIP programs affect take-up. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management24 (3): 499–522.
