Civil legal systems structure Americans’ relationship to the welfare state, offering grounds for contesting denials of benefits and preventing material harms like eviction. I draw on data from interviews with legal aid providers and tenant organizers to show how civil legal resources facilitate access to the safety net, and I argue that yoking legal aid and social policy is a strategy for managing a political economy that systematically undersupplies essential resources and protections. Notwithstanding the democratic ideal of social and civil rights as self-reinforcing and mutually constitutive, the relationship between social policy and civil legal aid underscores how these domains operate as substitutes rather than complements. Politically induced scarcity makes it necessary to leverage legal mechanisms to protect vulnerable Americans. Such necessity implicates acute democratic deficits that are most aptly addressed through fundamental changes to existing power relations.
AgranoffRobertMcGuireMichael. 2003. Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2.
AndriasKateSachsBenjamin I.. 2020. Constructing countervailing power: Law and organizing in an era of political inequality. Yale Law Journal130:546.
BatlanFelice. 2015. Women and justice for the poor: A history of legal aid, 1863–1945. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BeckAndrew F.HenizeAdrienne W.QiuTingTingHuangBinZhangYinKleinMelissa D.ParrishDonitaFinkElaine E.KahnRobert S.. 2022. Reductions in hospitalizations among children referred to a primary care–based medical-legal partnership. Health Affairs41 (3): 341–49.
6.
BenferEmily A.GluckAbbe R.KraschelKatherine. 2018. Medical-legal partnerships: Lessons from five diverse MLPs in New Haven, Connecticut. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics46 (3): 602–9.
7.
BenferEmily A.KoehlerRobertMarkAlyxNazzaroValerieAlexanderAnne KatHepburnPeterKeeneDanya E.DesmondMatthew. 2022. COVID-19 housing policy: State and federal eviction moratoria and supportive measures in the United States during the pandemic. Housing Policy Debate: 1–25. doi:10.1080/10511482.2022.2076713.
8.
BenferEmily A.VlahovDavidLongMarissa Y.Walker-WellsEvanPottengerJ. L.GonsalvesGreggKeeneDanya E.. 2021. Eviction, health inequity, and the spread of COVID-19: Housing policy as a primary pandemic mitigation strategy. Journal of Urban Health98:1–12.
9.
BermanElizabeth Popp. 2022. Thinking like an economist: How efficiency replaced equality in U.S. public policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BradyDavidBlomeAgnesKleiderHanna. 2016. How politics and institutions shape poverty and inequality. In The Oxford handbook of the social science of poverty, eds. BradyDavidBurtonLinda M., 117–40. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
BradyDavidFinniganRyan M.HübgenSabine. 2017. Rethinking the risks of poverty: A framework for analyzing prevalences and penalties. American Journal of Sociology123 (3): 740–86.
12.
BritoTonyaSabbethKathryn A.SteinbergJessica K.SudeallLauren. 2022. Racial capitalism in the civil courts. Columbia Law Review122:1243–83.
13.
CallisonKevinFingerDavidaSmithIsabella M.. 2022. COVID-19 eviction moratoriums and eviction filings: Evidence from New Orleans. Housing and Society49 (1): 1–9.
14.
CampbellDavid. 2012. Public managers in integrated services collaboratives: What works is workarounds. Public Administration Review72 (5): 721–30.
15.
DavisMartha F.1995. Brutal need: Lawyers and the welfare rights movement, 1960–1973. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
DesmondMatthew. 2016. Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group.
17.
Fleming-KlinkIsaiahMcCabeBrian J.RosenEva. 2023. Navigating an overburdened courtroom: How inconsistent rules, shadow procedures, and social capital disadvantage tenants in eviction court. City & Community22 (3): 220–45. doi:10.1177/15356841221141889.
18.
FrankoWilliam W.2021. How state responses to economic crisis shape income inequality and financial well-being. State Politics & Policy Quarterly21 (1): 31–54.
19.
FrankoWilliam W.WitkoChristopher. 2018. The new economic populism: How states respond to economic inequality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
GilmoreRuth Wilson. 2007. Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21.
Grinstein-WeissMichalChunYungRollStephenJabbariJason. 2021. Do racial and ethnic disparities in savings and job loss during COVID-19 explain disparities in housing hardships? A moderated mediation analysis. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science698 (1): 68–87.
22.
HackerJacob S.2004. Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review98 (2): 243–60.
23.
Jacob SHackerHertel-FernandezAlexanderPiersonPaulThelenKathleen, eds. 2021. The American political economy: Politics, markets, and power. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HackerJacob S.PiersonPaul. 2020. Let them eat tweets: How the right rules in an age of extreme inequality. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing.
25.
HardyBradleyHokayemCharlesRollStephen. 2021. Crashing without a parachute: Racial and educational disparities in unemployment during COVID-19. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science698 (1): 39–67.
26.
HepburnPeterLouisReneeFishJoeLemmermanEmilyAlexanderAnne KatThomasTimothy A.KoehlerRobertBenferEmilyDesmondMatthew. 2021. U.S. eviction filing patterns in 2020. Socius7. doi:10.1177/23780231211009983.
27.
HorowitzDonald L. (1977) 2010. The courts and social policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
28.
JacobsDavidDirlamJonathan C.. 2016. Politics and economic stratification: Power resources and income inequality in the United States. American Journal of Sociology122 (2): 469–500.
29.
JacobsDavidMyersLindsey. 2014. Union strength, neoliberalism, and inequality: Contingent political analyses of U.S. income differences since 1950. American Sociological Review79 (4): 752–74.
30.
JacobsLawrence R.SossJoe. 2010. The politics of inequality in America: A political economy framework. Annual Review of Political Science13:341–64.
31.
KaganRobert A.2002. Adversarial legalism: The American way of law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
KaplanAdiel. 25April2021. More people than ever need legal aid services. But the pandemic has hit legal aid funding hard. NBC News.
33.
KatzMichael B.1996. In the shadow of the poorhouse: A social history of welfare in America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
34.
KekezAnkaHowlettMichaelRameshM.. 2018. Varieties of collaboration in public service delivery. Policy Design and Practice1 (4): 243–52.
35.
KellerEricKellyNathan J.. 2015. Partisan politics, financial deregulation, and the new gilded age. Political Research Quarterly68 (3): 428–42.
36.
KellyNathan J.2005. Political choice, public policy, and distributional outcomes. American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 865–80.
37.
KellyNathan J.2009. The politics of income inequality in the United States. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
LensVicki. 2009. Seeking justice: Citizens’ use of fair hearings to correct errors in public welfare bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory19 (4): 817–37.
41.
LensVicki. 2012. Judge or bureaucrat? How administrative law judges exercise discretion in welfare bureaucracies. Social Service Review86 (2): 269–93.
42.
LensVicki. 2015. Poor justice: How the poor fare in the courts. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
LensVickiAugsbergerAstraeaHughesAndreaWuTina. 2013. Choreographing justice: Administrative law judges and the management of welfare disputes. Journal of Law and Society40 (2): 199–227.
44.
MarshallT. H.1950. Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
45.
McKayJohn. 2000. Federally funded legal services: A new vision of equal justice under law. Tennessee Law Review68 (1): 101–18.
46.
MichenerJamila. 2017. Social class as racialized political experience. The Forum15 (1): 93–110.
47.
MichenerJamila. 2018. Fragmented democracy: Medicaid, federalism, and unequal politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
48.
MichenerJamila. 2019. Power from the margins: Grassroots mobilization and urban expansions of civil legal rights. Urban Affairs Review56 (5): 1390–1422.
49.
MichenerJamila. 2022a. Civil justice, local organizations, and democracy. Columbia Law Review122 (5): 1389–422.
50.
MichenerJamila. 2022b. Race, power, and policy: Understanding state anti-eviction policies during COVID-19. Policy and Society41 (2): 231–46.
51.
MichenerJamila. 2023. Racism, power, and health equity: The case of tenant organizing. Health Affairs42 (10). doi: 10.1377/ hlthaff.2023.00509.
52.
MichenerJamilaSoRelleMallory. 2022. Politics, power, and precarity: How tenant organizations transform local political life. Interest Groups & Advocacy11 (2): 209–36.
53.
MichenerJamilaSoRelleMalloryThurstonChloe. 2022. From the margins to the center: A bottom-up approach to welfare state scholarship. Perspectives on Politics20 (1): 154–69.
54.
PiersonPaul. 1994. Dismantling the welfare state: Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
55.
PivenFrances Fox. 2008. The politics of retrenchment: The U.S. case. In The Oxford handbook of public policy, eds. GoodinRobertMoranMichaelReinMartin, 858–73. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56.
PleasencePascoeBalmerNigel J.. 2010. The audacity of justice: Recession, redundancy, rights and legal aid. Social Policy and Society9 (4): 475–88.
57.
PosnerEric A.1995. Contract law in the welfare state: A defense of the unconscionability doctrine, usury laws, and related limitations on the freedom to contract. Journal of Legal Studies24 (2): 283–319.
58.
QuigleyWilliam P.1998. The demise of law reform and the triumph of legal aid: Congress and the Legal Services Corporation from the 1960s to the 1990s. Saint Louis University Public Law Review17 (2): 241–64.
59.
RamcharanRodney. 2010. Inequality and redistribution: Evidence from U.S. counties and states, 1890–1930. Review of Economics and Statistics92 (4): 729–44.
60.
RhodeDeborah L.2004. Access to justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61.
RoyceEdward. 2022. Poverty and power: The problem of structural inequality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
SandefurRebecca L.2008. Access to civil justice and race, class, and gender inequality. Annual Review of Sociology34:339–58.
64.
SandefurRebecca L.2009. Fulcrum point of equal access to justice: Legal and nonlegal institutions of remedy. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review42 (4): 949–78.
65.
SandefurRebecca L.2015. What we know and need to know about the legal needs of the public. South Carolina Law Review67 (2): 443–59.
66.
ScottTyler A.ThomasCraig W.. 2017. Unpacking the collaborative toolbox: Why and when do public managers choose collaborative governance strategies?Policy Studies Journal45 (1): 191–214.
67.
ShanahanColleen F.SteinbergJessicaMarkAlyxCarpenterAnna E.. 2022. The institutional mismatch of state civil courts. Columbia Law Review122 (5): 1471–1538.
68.
SimonWilliam H.1986. Rights and redistribution in the welfare system. Stanford Law Review38 (6): 1431–1516.
69.
SmallMarioCalarcoJessica McCrory. 2022. Qualitative literacy: A guide to evaluating ethnographic and interview research. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
70.
SoRelleMallory E.2020. Democracy declined: The failed politics of consumer financial protection. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
71.
SossJoeFordingRichard C.SchramSanford. 2011. Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
72.
ThurstonChloe. 2018. At the boundaries of home ownership: Credit, discrimination, and the American state. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
73.
TigheRosieMuellerElizabeth. 2013. The affordable housing reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
WhiteLucie E.1990. Goldberg v. Kelly on the paradox of lawyering for the poor. Brooklyn Law Review56 (3): 861–88.
76.
WhitlowJohn. 2019. Gentrification and countermovement: The right to counsel and New York City’s affordable housing crisis. Fordham Urban Law Journal46 (5): 1081–1136.
77.
YinRobert K.2009. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
