We study public assistance participation among homeless shelter users, characterizing the trajectories of public assistance receipt for individuals before and after they enter shelters and analyzing the influence of public assistance participation on subsequent shelter use. Our analysis identifies three distinct groups of shelter users based on personal characteristics and prior patterns of public assistance use. These groups are differentiated by their patterns of no use, increasing use, and high use of public assistance. For all three groups, increased participation in public assistance programs following the first observed homeless shelter entry reduces subsequent shelter use. The analysis draws attention to the potential role of public assistance programs and strengthened coordination of services for the prevention of homelessness.
AdairCarol E.StreinerDavid L.BarnhartRyanKoppBriannaVeldhuizenScottPattersonMichelleAubryTimLavoieJenniferSareenJitenderLeBlancStefanie ReneeGoeringPaula. 2017. Outcome trajectories among homeless individuals with mental disorders in a multisite randomised controlled trial of Housing First. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie62 (1): 30–39.
2.
BurtMarthaKhadduriJillGubitsDaniel. 2016. Are homeless families connected to the social safety net? In Homeless families research brief. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation (OPRE), Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available from https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/198426/HomelessSafetyNet.pdf.
3.
ChuCherry M. T.MoodieErica E. M.StreinerDavid L.LatimerEric A. 2020. Trajectories of homeless shelter utilization in the At Home/Chez Soi trial of Housing First. Psychiatric Services71 (7): 648–55.
4.
CollinsSusan E.MaloneDaniel K.ClifasefiSeema L. 2013. Housing retention in single-site Housing First for chronically homeless individuals with severe alcohol problems. American Journal of Public Health103:S269–74.
5.
DennisDeborahLassiterMargaretConnellyWilliam H.LupferKristin S. 2011. Helping adults who are homeless gain disability benefits: The SSI/SSDI Outreach, Access, and Recovery (SOAR) Program. Psychiatric Services62 (11): 1373–76.
6.
FischerRobert L.RichterFrancisca Garcia-CobianAnthonyElizabethLalichNinaCoultonClaudia. 2019. Leveraging administrative data to better serve children and families. Public Administration Review79 (5): 675–83.
7.
GlendeningZachary S.McCauleyErinShinnMarybethBrownScott R. 2018. Long-term housing subsidies and SSI/SSDI income: Creating health-promoting contexts for families experiencing housing instability with disabilities. Disability and Health Journal11 (2): 214–20.
8.
GubitsDanielShinnMarybethWoodMichelleBellStephenDastrupSamuelSolariClaudiaBrownScottMcInnisDebiMcCallTomKattelUtsay. 2016. Family Options study: 3-year impacts of housing and services interventions for homeless families. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research.
9.
JonesBobby L.NaginDaniel S. 2013. A note on a Stata plugin for estimating group-based trajectory models. Sociological Methods & Research42 (4): 608–13.
LachaudJamesMejia-LancherosCilaHwangStephen W. 2021. Housing First and severe mental disorders: The challenges of exiting homelessness. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
13.
McAllisterWilliamLennonMary ClareKuangLi. 2011. Rethinking research on forming typologies of homelessness. American Journal of Public Health101 (4): 596–601.
MetrauxStephenFargoJamisonEngNicholasCulhaneDennis P. 2018. Employment and earnings trajectories during two decades among adults in New York city homeless shelters. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research20 (2): 117–46.
16.
NaginDaniel S.JonesBobby L.PassosValeria LimaTremblayRichard E. 2018. Group-based multi-trajectory modeling. Statistical Methods in Medical Research27 (7): 2015–23.
17.
NaginDaniel S.OdgersCandice L. 2010. Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology6 (6): 109–38.
18.
O’FlahertyB.2004. Wrong person and wrong place: For homelessness, the conjunction is what matters. Journal of Housing Economics13 (1): 1–15.
PoulinStephen R.MaguireMarcellaMetrauxStephenCulhaneDennis P. 2010. Service use and costs for persons experiencing chronic homelessness in Philadelphia: A population-based study. Psychiatric Services61 (11): 1093–98.
21.
SadowskiLaura S.KeeRomina A.VanderWeeleTyler J.BuchananDavid. 2009. Effect of a housing and case management program on emergency department visits and hospitalizations among chronically ill homeless adults. A randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association301 (17): 1771–78.
22.
SkardhamarTorbjørn. 2010. Distinguishing facts and artifacts in group-based modeling. Criminology48 (1): 295–320.
23.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2013. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families information memorandum. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ofa/resource/tanf-acf-im-2013-01.
