The rise of Donald Trump has weakened the dominance of the “American exceptionalism” paradigm in analyses of U.S. politics, but the pivot to views of the United States as part of a global trend toward democratic backsliding ignores important, uniquely “American” cultural, historical, and institutional attributes that make the country more at risk for democratic erosion than most other established democracies. This short article puts Trump, and his Republican Party, into the broader comparative perspective of (European) far-right studies. I argue that Trump in many ways fits the “fourth wave” of postwar far-right politics, lay out the unique challenge that the United States is facing in terms of democratic erosion, and draw on the case of Viktor Orbán in Hungary to learn lessons for the United States. The article ends with some suggestions of how democrats (not just Democrats) should address the far-right Republican challenge to U.S. democracy.
AlbertazziDanieleMuellerSean. 2013. Populism and liberal democracy: Populists in government in Austria, Italy, Poland, and Switzerland. Government and Opposition48 (3): 343–71.
2.
ApplebaumAnne. 10February2020. This is how Reaganism and Thatcherism end. The Atlantic.
3.
BánkutiMiklósHalmaiGáborScheppeleKim-Lane. 2013. Disabling the constitution. Journal of Democracy23 (3): 121–31.
4.
BartelsLarry. 10November2016. 2016 was an ordinary election, not a realignment. Washington Post.
5.
BermanSheri. 1997. Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics49 (3): 401–29.
6.
BlumRachel M.2020. How the Tea Party captured the GOP: Insurgent factions in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BobbioNorberto. 1997. Left and Right: The significance of a political distinction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
CineasFabiola. 9January2021. Donald Trump is the accelerant. Vox.
10.
Drobnic NolanAngie. 26April2019. In context: Donald Trump’s “very fine people on both sides” remarks (transcript). Politifact.
11.
DrutmanLee. 2022. Moderation, realignment, or transformation? Evaluating three approaches to America’s crisis of democracy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
12.
FowlerBrigid. 2004. Concentrated orange: Fidesz and the remaking of the Hungarian centre-right, 1994-2002. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics20 (3): 80–114.
13.
GalvinDaniel J.2020. Party domination and base mobilization: Donald Trump and Republican Party building in a polarized era. The Forum18 (2). Available from www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2020-2003/html (accessed 5 September 2021).
14.
GambinoLauren. 13January2021. Donald Trump impeached a second time over mob attack on US Capitol. The Guardian.
15.
GreskovitsBéla. 2020. Rebuilding the Hungarian right through conquering civil society: The civic circles movement. East Europe Politics36 (2): 247–66.
16.
GrumbachJacob M.MichenerJamila. 2022. American federalism, political inequality, and democratic erosion. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
17.
HaltiwangerJohn. 20January2021. Trump’s biggest accomplishments and failures from his 1-term presidency. Business Insider.
18.
HanHahrieKimJae Yeon. 2022. Civil society, realized: Equipping the mass public to express choice and negotiate power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
19.
HermanLise EstherHoernerJulianLaceyJoseph. 2021. Why does the European right accommodate backsliding states? An analysis of 24 European People’s Party votes (2011–2019). European Political Science Review13 (2): 169–87.
20.
IgnaziPiero. 1992. The silent counter-revolution: Hypotheses on the emergence of extreme right-wing parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research22 (1): 3–34.
21.
KelemenR. Daniel. 2020. The European Union’s authoritarian equilibrium. Journal of European Public Policy27 (3): 481–99.
22.
KimSeongcheol. 2021. . . . Because the homeland cannot be in opposition: Analysing the discourses of Fidesz and Law and Justice (PiS) from opposition to power. East European Politics37 (2): 332–51.
23.
KrekóPéterEnyediZsolt. 2018. Explaining Eastern Europe: Orbán’s laboratory of illiberalism. Journal of Democracy29 (3): 39–51.
24.
LendvaiPaul. 2017. Orbán: Europe’s new strongman. London: Hurst.
25.
LeonhartDavidPhilbrickIan Prasad. 15January2018. Donald Trump’s racism: The definitive list, updated. New York Times.
26.
LevitskyStevenZiblattDaniel. 2018. How democracies die. New York, NY: Crown.
27.
LinzJuan J.StepanAlfred. 1996. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
MátayMónikaKaposiIldikó. 2018. Radicals online: The Hungarian street protest of 2006 and the Internet. In Finding the right place on the map: Central and Eastern European media change in a global perspective, eds. JakubowiczKarolSükösdMíklós, 277–96. Bristol: Intellect.
29.
MettlerSuzanneLiebermanRobert C.2020. Four threats: The recurring crises of American democracy. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
30.
MillerGreg. 23September2020. Allegations of racism have marked Trump’s presidency and become key issue as election nears. Washington Post.
31.
MuddeCas. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
MuddeCas. 2019. The far right today. Cambridge: Polity.
33.
RogersKatieFandosNicholas. 14July2019. Trump tells Congresswomen to “go back” to the countries they came from. New York Times.
34.
RooseJochenKarolewskiIreneusz Pawel. 2019. The national conservative parties in Poland and Hungary and their core supporters compared: Values and socio-structural background. In New conservatives in Russia and East Central Europe, eds. BluhmKatharinaVargaMihai, 113–29. London: Routledge.
35.
ScheiringGáborSzombatiKristóf. 2020. From neoliberal disembedding to authoritarian re-embedding: The making of illiberal hegemony in Hungary. International Sociology35 (6): 721–38.
36.
ScheppeleKim Lane. 2013. The rule of law and the Frankenstate: Why governance checklists do not work. Governance26 (4): 559–62.
37.
SlaterDan. 2022. Threats or gains: The battle over participation in America’s careening democracy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
38.
von BeymeKlaus. 1988. Right-wing extremism in post-war Europe. West European Politics11 (2): 1–18.
39.
WayLucan AhmadLevitskySteven. 4January2019. How autocrats can rig the game and damage democracy. Washington Post.
40.
WhiteheadLaurence, ed. 1996. The international dimensions of democratization: Europe and the Americas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
WilliamsonVanessaSkocpolTheda. 11May2017. What can (and should) activists learn from the Tea Party. Washington Post.
