To understand what placement outside of one’s home means to the young people involved, we must understand foster care from a life course perspective. I analyze young people’s experiences in foster care from this perspective, accounting for when foster care happens, how long it lasts, and what happens when foster care placements end. I show that the population of children coming into foster care is younger and less urban than it was 20 years ago. I also show reliable measures of exposure to foster care over the life course. Children who enter care early in life are the children who spend the largest proportion of their childhood in foster care—a fact that rarely weighs on the policymaking process. We know very little about state and local variation in foster care placement rates, not to mention the influence of social services, the courts, foster parents, and caseworkers over foster children, so I close by arguing investment in research should be a clear policy priority.
AllardScott W.2017. Places in need: The changing geography of poverty. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
2.
BergerLawrence M.SlackKristen S.2020. The contemporary U.S. child welfare system(s): Overview and key challenges. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
3.
BlackstoneErwin A.BuckA. J.HakimS.2004. Privatizing adoption and foster care: Applying auction and market solutions. Children and Youth Services Review26 (11): 1033–49.
4.
BullockRogerCourtneyM. E.ParkerR.SinclairI.ThoburnJ.2006. Can the corporate state parent?Children and Youth Services Review28 (11): 1344–58.
5.
ChamberlainPatriciaPriceJ. M.ReidJ. B.LandsverkJ.FisherP. A.StoolmillerM.2006. Who disrupts from placement in foster and kinship care?Child Abuse & Neglect30 (4): 409–24.
6.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. 2019. Kinship guardianship as a permanency option. Washington, DC: Child Welfare Information Gateway.
7.
Children’s Bureau. 2019. Reentries into foster care. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
8.
CoakleyJennifer F.BerrickJ. D.2007. Research review: In a rush to permanency: Preventing adoption disruption. Child and Family Social Work. Available from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00468.x.
9.
CoultonClaudia J.CramptonD. S.IrwinM.SpilsburyJ. C.KorbinJ. E.2007. How neighborhoods influence child maltreatment: A review of the literature and alternative pathways. Child Abuse & Neglect31 (11–12): 1117–42.
10.
CoultonClaudia J.KorbinJ. E.SuM.ChowJ.1995. Community level factors and child maltreatment rates. Child Development66 (5): 1262–76.
11.
CourtneyMark E.OkpychN. J.ParkK.HartyJ.FengH.Torres-GarciaA.SayedS.2018. Findings from the California Youth Transitions to Adulthood Study (CalYOUTH): Conditions of youth at age19, 10–190. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.
12.
DeatonAngusCartwrightN.2018. Reflections on randomized control trials. Social Science and Medicine210:86–90.
13.
DoyleJoseph J.2013. Causal effects of foster care: An instrumental-variables approach. Children and Youth Services Review35 (7): 1143–51.
14.
DrakeBrettPandeyS.1996. Understanding the relationship between neighborhood poverty and specific types of child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect20 (11): 1003–18.
15.
DworskyAmyWulczynF.HuangL.2018. Predictors of running away from out-of-home care: Does county context matter?Cityscape20 (3): 101–16.
16.
ElderGlen H.1994. Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly57 (1): 4–15.
17.
ElderGlen H.1998. The life course as developmental theory. Child Development69 (1): 1–12.
18.
EllisBruce J.JacksonJ. J.BoyceW. T.2006. The stress response systems: Universality and adaptive individual differences. Developmental Review26 (2): 175–212.
19.
FeelyMeganRaissianKerri M.SchneiderWilliamBullingerLindsey Rose. 2020. The social welfare policy landscape and child protective services: Opportunities for and barriers to creating systems synergy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
20.
FlahertyChrisCollins-CamargoC.LeeE.2008. Privatization of child welfare services: Lessons learned from experienced states regarding site readiness assessment and planning. Children and Youth Services Review30 (7): 809–20.
21.
FontSarah A.BergerL. M.CancianM.NoyesJ. L.2018. Permanency and the educational and economic attainment of former foster children in early adulthood. American Sociological Review83 (4): 716–43.
FreisthlerBridgeMerrittD. H.LaScalaE. A.2006. Understanding the ecology of child maltreatment: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Child Maltreatment11 (3): 263–80.
24.
Government Accountability Office (GAO). 1997. Social service privatization: Expansion poses challenges in ensuring accountability for program results. Vol. GAO/HEHS-98-6. Washington, DC: GAO.
GypenLauraVanderfaeillieJ.MaeyerS. D.BelengerL.HolenF. V.2017. Outcomes of children who grew up in foster care: Systematic-review. Children and Youth Services Review76:74–83.
27.
HaskinsRon. 2020. Child welfare financing: What do we fund, how, and what could be improved?The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
28.
HutsonRutledge Q.2001. Red flags: Research raises concerns about the impact of “welfare reform,” on child maltreatment. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.
29.
IngramDeborahFrancoS. J.2014. 2013NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. Vital and Health Statistics2 (166). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_166.pdf.
30.
JamesSigrid. 2011. Why do foster care placements disrupt? An investigation of reasons for placement change in foster care. Social Service Review78 (4): 601–27.
31.
JedwabMeravShawT. V.2017. Predictors of reentry into the foster care system: Comparison of children with and without previous removal experience. Children and Youth Services Review82:177–84.
32.
JonesAnnette S.LaLiberteT.2017. Risk and protective factors of foster care reentry: An examination of the literature. Journal of Public Child Welfare11 (4–5): 516–45.
33.
Jones HardenBrendaSimonsCassandraJohnson-MotoyamaMichelleBarthRichard. 2021. The child maltreatment landscape: Where are we now and where should we go. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
34.
KimberlinSara E.AnthonyE. K.AustinM. J.2009. Re-entering foster care: Trends, evidence, and implications. Children and Youth Services Review31 (4): 471–81.
35.
LawrenceCatherine R.CarlsonE. A.EgelandB.2006. The impact of foster care on development. Development and Psychopathology18 (1): 57–76.
36.
LeryBridgett. 2009. Neighborhood structure and foster care entry risk: The role of spatial scale in defining neighborhoods. Children and Youth Services Review31 (3): 331–37.
37.
LiaoMinliWhiteK. R.2014. Post-permanency service needs, service utilization, and placement discontinuity for kinship versus non-kinship families. Children and Youth Services Review44 (C): 370–78.
38.
Maguire-JackKathrynLanierP.Johnson-MotoyamaM.WelchH.DineenM.2015. Geographic variation in racial disparities in child maltreatment: The influence of county poverty and population density. Child Abuse & Neglect47:1–13.
39.
MillerLeonieRandleM.DolnicarS.2018. Carer factors associated with foster-placement success and breakdown. British Journal of Social Work49 (2): 503–22.
40.
NaginDaniel S.SampsonR. J.2019. The real gold standard: Measuring counterfactual worlds that matter most to social science and policy. Annual Review of Criminology2 (1): 123–45.
41.
National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. 2013. The science of neglect: The persistent absence of responsive care disrupts the developing brain. Working Paper 12, Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
42.
PalaciosJesús.RolockN.SelwynJ.Barbosa-DucharneM.2018. Adoption breakdown: Concept, research, and implications. Research on Social Work Practice29 (2): 130–42.
43.
ParoliniArnoShlonskyA.MagruderJ.EastmanA. L.WulczynF.WebsterD.2018. Age and other risk factors related to reentry to care from kin guardian homes. Child Abuse & Neglect79:315–24.
44.
RolockNancy. 2015. Post-permanency continuity: What happens after adoption and guardianship from foster care?Journal of Public Child Welfare9:155–73.
45.
RolockNancyWhiteK.2016. Post-permanency discontinuity: A longitudinal examination of outcomes for foster youth after adoption or guardianship. Children and Youth Services Review70:419–27.
46.
RolockNancyWhiteK. R.OcasioK.ZhangL.MacKenzieM. J.FongR.2018. A comparison of foster care reentry after adoption in two large U.S. states. Research on Social Work Practice29 (2): 153–64.
47.
RoygardnerDebangshuHughesKelli N.PalusciVincent J.2021. Leveraging family and community strengths to reduce child maltreatment. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
48.
SamuelsGina. 2008. A reason, a season, or a lifetime: Relational permanence among young adults with foster care backgrounds. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.
49.
SchwartzMeryl. 1996. Reinventing guardianship: Subsidized guardianship, foster care, and child welfare. NYU Review of Law and Social ChangeXXII:441–82.
50.
ShawTerry V.2006. Reentry into the foster care system after reunification. Children and Youth Services Review28 (11): 1375–90.
51.
SlackKristen S.BergerLawrence. 2021. Who is and is not served by child protective services systems? Implications for a prevention infrastructure to reduce child maltreatment. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
52.
SmithS. L.HowardJ. A.GarnierP. C.RyanS. D.2006. Where are we now? A post-ASFA examination of adoption disruption. Adoption Quarterly9 (4): 19–44.
53.
TestaMark F.2002. Kinship care and permanency. Journal of Social Service Research28 (1): 25–43.
54.
TestaMark F.2004. When children cannot return home: Adoption and guardianship. The Future of Children14 (1): 114–29.
55.
TestaMark F.KellyDavid. 2020. The evolution of federal child welfare policy through the Family First Prevention Services Act of 2018. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
56.
TestaMark F.SnyderS. M.WuQ.RolockN.LiaoM.2015. Adoption and guardianship: A moderated mediation analysis of predictors of post-permanency continuity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry85 (2): 107–18.
57.
VesneskiWiliam. 2011. State law and the termination of parental rights. Family Court Review49 (2): 364–78.
58.
WaldMichael S.1976. State intervention on behalf of “neglected” children: Standards for removal of children from their homes, monitoring the status of children in foster care, and termination of parental rights. Stanford Law Review28 (4). Available from https://doi.org/10.2307/1228098.
59.
WulczynFred. 1991. Caseload dynamics and foster care reentry. Social Service Review65 (1): 133–56.
60.
WulczynFred. 2004. Family reunification. The Future of Children14 (1): 94–113.
61.
WulczynFredAlpertL.MartinezZ.WeissA.2015. Within and between state variation in the use of congregate care. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall.
62.
WulczynFredBarthR.YuanY.-Y.Jones HardenB.LandsverkJ.2005. Beyond common sense: Child welfare, child well-being, and the evidence for policy reform. New York, NY: Routledge.
63.
WulczynFredChenL.OrlebekeB.2009. Evaluating contract agency performance in achieving reunification. Children and Youth Services Review31 (5): 506–12.
64.
WulczynFredHislopK.HardenB.2002. The placement of infants in foster care. Infant Mental Health Journal23 (5): 454–75.
65.
WulczynFredHuhrS.HislopK.ChenL.OrlebekeB.HaightJ.AlpertL.FeldmanS.2016. Lives lived in foster care: Variation in the ways children leave placement. Chicago, IL: Center for State Child Welfare Data, Chapin Hall, University of Chicago.
66.
WulczynFredHuhrS.McClanahanJ.2018. African American/white disparities in the Tennessee foster care system. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall.
67.
WulczynFredHuhrS.SchmitsF.WilkinsA.2017. Understanding the differences in how adolescents leave foster care. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
