The Swedish welfare model is gradually losing its former characteristics. Notable is the extensive privatization of provision and the emerging privatization of funding, primarily through new and half-private services in health care, education, and elderly care. The clearest example of this trend is the rise of private health insurance, which is now signed by every tenth person of working age. This article points out different types of regulations that have provoked the rise of private health insurance, and discusses types of regulations that could potentially slow privatization. Further, this article analyzes three official welfare investigation reports. These reports avoid the decisive regulations they are supposed to discuss, and sometimes go against directives to do so. I argue that regulations for private health insurance have occurred without much debate, while every potential regulation against private health insurance is very much disputed by industry interests and many of the political parties.
AdemaWillemFronPaulineLadaiqueMaxime. 2014. How much do OECD countries spend on social protection and how redistributive are their tax/benefit systems?International Social Security Review67 (1): 1–25.
AndersonGerard F.HusseyPeterPetrosyanVarduhi. 2019. It’s still the prices, Stupid: Why the U.S. spends so much on health care, and a tribute to Uwe Reinhardt. Health Affairs38 (1): 87–95.
4.
AlmqvistAnna. 2016. Den ekonomiska ojämlikheten i Sverige. Stockholm: Bantorget Grafiska AB.
5.
AnderssonBengt-Olof. 2000. Den svenska modellens tredje kompromiss: Efterkrigstidens välfärdspolitik med utgångspunkt från industrins kompetenssäkring och skolans reformering. Göteborg: Ekonomisk-historiska institutionen.
6.
AntmanPeterSchoriPierre. 1996. Olof Palme: den gränslöse reformisten. Stockholm: Tiden.
7.
ApplequistJanelleBallJennifer Gerard. 2018. An updated analysis of direct-to-consumer television advertisements for prescription drugs. The Annals of Family Medicine16 (3): 211–16.
8.
BarrettGarry F.ConlonRobert. 2003. Adverse selection and the decline in private health insurance coverage in Australia: 1989–95. Economic Record79 (246): 279–96.
9.
BenishAvishaiHaberHananEliahouRotem. 2017. The regulatory welfare state in pension markets: mitigating high charges for low-income savers in the United Kingdom and Israel. Journal of Social Policy46 (2): 313–30.
10.
BernitzUlf. 2011. Svensk och europeisk marknadsrätt 1. Stockholm: Norstedts juridik.
11.
BlomqvistPaula. 2004. The choice revolution: Privatization of Swedish welfare services in the 1990s. Social Policy & Administration38 (2): 139–55.
12.
BlythMark. 2001. The transformation of the Swedish model: Economic ideas, distributional conflict, and institutional change. World Politics54 (1): 1–26.
13.
BodenheimerThomas. 2005. High and rising health care costs. Part 2: Technologic innovation. Annals of Internal Medicine142 (11): 932–37.
14.
BoréusKerstin. 1994. Högervåg: nyliberalismen och kampen om språket i svensk debatt 1969– 1989. Stockholm: Tiden.
15.
BusemeyerMariusIversenTorben. 2020. The welfare state with private alternatives: The transformation of popular support for social insurance. The Journal of Politics 82 (2).
16.
CoxRobert. 2004. The path-dependency of an idea: why Scandinavian welfare states remain distinct. Social Policy & Administration38 (2): 204–19.
17.
DahlgrenGöran. 1994. Framtidens sjukvårdsmarknader. Stockholm: Natur och kultur i samarbete med Institutet för framtidsstudier.
18.
DanielsNorman. 1985. Just health care. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
DeckerSandra L.2012. In 2011 nearly one-third of physicians said they would not accept new Medicaid patients, but rising fees may help. Health Affairs31 (8): 1673–1679.
20.
DobbinFrank R.1992. The origins of private social insurance: Public policy and fringe benefits in America, 1920–1950. American Journal of Sociology97 (5): 1416–1450.
21.
DonahueJohn. 1989. The privatization decision: Public ends, private means. New York, NY: Basic Books.
22.
EdwardssonEva.2003. Konkurrenslagen och konkurrensbegränsande offentliga regleringar. PhD diss.
23.
ErlandssonEva.9December2019. Sjukvårdsförsäkringar avlastar den skattefinansierade vården. Dagens Nyheter.
24.
Esping-AndersenGøsta. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
Ethical Committee of the Swedish Society of Medicine. 2020. Privata sjukvårdsförsäkringar leder till vård på olika villkor. Available from www.sls.se.
26.
GiddensAnthony. 1998. The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
27.
GreßStefan. 2007. Private health insurance in Germany: Consequences of a dual system. Healthcare Policy3 (2): 29.
28.
GudmundsonPer.5April2017. Hur många gånger måste man betala för att få träffa doktorn. Svenska Dagbladet.
29.
HackerJacob S.2002. The divided welfare state: The battle over public and private social benefits in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
HackerJacob S.2004. Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review98 (2): 243–60.
31.
HarveyDavid. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
HoodChristopher. 1991. A public management for all seasons?Public Administration69 (1): 3– 19.
33.
HowardChristopher. 1999. The hidden welfare state: Tax expenditures and social policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
JacobsDouglas BernardSommersBenjamin Daniel. 2015. Using drugs to discriminate— Adverse selection in the insurance marketplace. New England Journal of Medicine372 (5): 399–402.
35.
KitscheltHerbert. 1994. The transformation of european social democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
LO and The Swedish Medical Association. 9December2019. Privata sjukvårdsförsäkringar underminerar offentlig vård. Dagens Nyheter.
37.
LapidusJohn. 2017. Private health insurance in Sweden: Fast-track lanes and the alleged attempts to stop them. Health Policy121 (4): 442–49.
38.
LapidusJohn.14November2018. Tillitsdelegationen undviker de viktiga frågorna. Dagens Medicin.
39.
LapidusJohn. 2019a. The quest for a divided welfare state: Sweden in the era of privatization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
LapidusJohn. 2019b. 5July2019. Skatteverket dansar efter försäkringsbolagens pipa. Dagens Samhälle.
41.
LapidusJohn. 2019c. 16December2019. När ska S kliva ut ur skuggorna och kämpa för välfärden. ETC.
42.
Levi-FaurDavid. 2014. The welfare state: A regulatory perspective. Public Administration92 (3): 599–614.
43.
MahoneyJamesThelenKathleen, eds. 2010. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
MettlerSuzanne. 2011. The submerged state: How invisible government policies undermine American democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
MorinAnders. 20October2016. Privata försäkringar förstärker sjukvården. Svenska Dagbladet.
46.
MårderGüntherBjurThomas af. 2May2018. Nya straffskatten gör Sverige sjukare. Expressen.
47.
NorénLars. 2008. Att göra patienter till kunder – om sjukvårdsförsäkringar och entreprenörskap. In Perspektiv på förnyelse och entreprenörskap i offentlig verksamhet, eds. LundströmA.SundinE.Örebro: Forum för småföretagarforskning
48.
PanellaMassimiliano, et al2015. Defensive medicine: Defensive medicine: Overview of the literature. Igiene e sanita pubblica71 (3): 335–51.
49.
PiersonPaul. 1996. The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics48 (2): 143–79.
50.
PontussonJonas. 1987. Radicalization and retreat in Swedish social democracy. New Left Review165:5–33.
51.
PremforsRune. 1991. The “Swedish model” and public sector reform. West European Politics14 (3): 83–95.
52.
ReinhardtUwe E.HusseyPeter S.AndersonGerard F.2004. US health care spending in an international context. Health Affairs23 (3): 10–25.
53.
RibeiroSineva.4February2020. Vårdförbundet kritiskt mot privata sjukvårdsförsäkringar. Arbetsvärlden.
54.
RothsteinBo. 1988. Socialdemokratin och välfärdens institutioner. Tiden88 (8): 467–74.
55.
RothsteinBo. 1998. Just institutions matter: The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
56.
RumboldBenedict E.2017. The moral right to health: A survey of available conceptions. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20 (4): 508–28.
57.
RynerMagnus2002. Capitalist restructuring, globalization and the third way: Lessons from the Swedish model. London: Routledge.
58.
SchroederSteven A.FristWilliam. 2013. Phasing out fee-for-service payment. The New England Journal of Medicine368 (21): 2029–2032.
59.
SkoglundCaj. 2012. Privata sjukvårdsförsäkringar i Sverige–omfattning och utveckling. Rapport till SKL, 2–49.
60.
SOU. 2018. Styrning och vårdkonsumtion ur ett jämlikhetsperspektiv. Available from www.regeringen.se.
StarrPeter. 1988. The meaning of privatization. Yale Law & Policy Review6 (1): 6–41.
63.
StarrPeter. 2008. The social transformation of American medicine: The rise of a sovereign profession and the making of a vast industry. New York, NY: Basic Books.
64.
StreeckWolfgangThelenKathleen Ann, eds. 2005. Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
65.
Socialdepartementet. 2016. Privata sjukvårdsförsäkringar inom offentligt finansierad hälso- och sjukvård. Available from www.regeringen.se.
66.
SvallforsStefan. 2011. A bedrock of support? Trends in welfare state attitudes in Sweden, 1981–2010. Social Policy & Administration45 (7): 806–25.
67.
Swedish Tax Agency. 2018. Förmån av hälso- och sjukvård. Available from www.skatteverket.se.
68.
Swedish Tax Agency. 2019. Beräkning av sjukvårdsförsäkringsförmån. Available from www.skatteverket.se.
69.
Swedish Tax Agency. 2019b. Appendix. Svensk Försäkrings klassificering av insatser inom sjukvårdsförsäkringarna. Available from www.skatteverket.se.
70.
TherbornGöran. 2018. Kapitalet, överheten och alla vi andra: klassamhället i Sverige - det rådande och det kommande. Stockholm: Arkiv förlag.
71.
ThomsonSarahMossialosElias. 2006. Choice of public or private health insurance: Learning from the experience of Germany and the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy16 (4): 315–27.
72.
ThomsonSarahMossialosElias. 2009. Private health insurance in the European Union. European Commission, 320–23.
73.
Tillitsdelegationen. 2018. Med tillit växer handlingsutrymmet. Available from www.tillitsdelegationen.se.
74.
Vårdanalys. 2017. Löftesfri garanti? En uppföljning av den nationella vårdgarantin. Stockholm.
75.
Välfärdsutredningen. 2016. Ordning och reda I välfärden. Available from www.regeringen.se.
76.
LundbergJacobWaldenströmDaniel. 2018. Wealth inequality in Sweden: What can we learn from capitalized income tax data?Review of Income and Wealth64 (3): 517–41.
77.
WiborgSusanne. 2015. Privatizing education: Free school policy in Sweden and England. Comparative Education Review59 (3): 473–97.
78.
WoolhandlerSteffieCampbellTerryHimmelsteinDavid U.2003. Costs of health care administration in the United States and Canada. New England Journal of Medicine349 (8): 768–75.
