Public policies sometimes generate “policy feedback effects,” reshaping public opinion and political participation among beneficiaries or the public generally, often with the effects of generating supportive constituencies that help to sustain the program. Yet such effects do not always occur; in fact, despite that Americans use more social policies than ever, antipathy to government runs high—evidence of a seeming “government-citizen disconnect.” Policy design and delivery matters for policy feedback, as policies that make government’s role more visible may make more of an impression on beneficiaries; yet political polarization and distrust in government can interfere with such effects. In addition, those who are most aware of the government’s role in social provision often participate least in politics, and vice versa. This article considers strategies that public officials and other civic and political leaders can use to facilitate policy feedback effects.
AchenChristopher M.BartelsLarry M.2016. Democracy for realists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
CampbellAndrea. 2003. How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the American welfare state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
CookFay LomaxJacobsLawrenceKimDukhong. 2010. Trusting what you know: Information, knowledge, and confidence in social security. Journal of Politics72 (2): 397–412.
4.
CramerKatherine. 2016. The politics of resentment. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
5.
FreeLloydCantrilHadley. 1967. The political beliefs of Americans. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
6.
GilensMartin. 1999. Why Americans hate welfare. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
GilensMartin. 2012. Affluence and influence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Halpern-MeekinSarahEdinKathrynTachLauraSykesJennifer. 2015. It’s not like I’m poor: How working families make ends meet in a post-welfare world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9.
JacobsLawrence R.MettlerSuzanne. 2018. When and how new policy creates new politics: Examining the feedback effects of the Affordable Care Act on public opinion. Perspectives on Politics16 (2): 345–63.
10.
JacobsLawrence R.MettlerSuzanneZhuLing. Forthcoming. Affordable Care Act: Moving to new stage of public acceptance. Journal of Health Policy, Politics, and Law.
LermanAmy E.McCabeKatherine T.2017. Personal experiences and public opinion: A theory and test of conditional policy feedback. Journal of Politics79 (2): 624–41.
13.
LermanAmy E.SadinMeredithTrachtmanSamuel. 2017. Policy uptake as political behavior: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act. American Political Science Review111 (4): 755–70.
14.
LermanAmy E.WeaverVesla M.2014. Arresting citizenship: The democratic consequences of American crime control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
LubellSamuel. 1952. The future of American politics. New York, NY: Harper and Brothers.
16.
MasonLilliana. 2015. “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science59 (1): 128–45.
17.
MettlerSuzanne. 2011. The submerged state: How invisible government policies undermine American democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
MettlerSuzanne. 2005. Soldiers to citizens: The G.I. Bill and the making of the greatest generation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
MettlerSuzanne. 2018. The government-citizen disconnect. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
MichenerJamila. 2018. Fragmented democracy: Medicaid, federalism, and unequal politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
MorganKimberly J.CampbellAndrea. 2011. The delegated welfare state: Medicare, markets, and the governance of social policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
PatashnikEric M.2008. Reforms at risk: What happens after major policy changes are enacted. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
PatashnikEric M.ZelizerJulian E.2013. The struggle to remake politics: Liberal reform and the limits of policy feedback in the contemporary American state. Perspectives on Politics11 (4): 1071–87.
24.
PiersonPaul. 1993. When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics45 (4): 595–628.
25.
RoseDeondra. 2018. Citizens by degree: Higher education policy and the changing gender dynamics of American citizenship. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
SchlozmanKay LehmanVerbaSidneyBradyHenry E.2012. The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
SchneiderAnne LarsonIngramHelen. 1993. Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review87 (2): 334–47.
28.
SkocpolTheda. 1991. Targeting within universalism: Politically viable policies to combat poverty in the United States. In The urban underclass, eds. JencksChristopherPetersonPaul E., 411–36. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
29.
SkocpolTheda. 1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
SossJoeFordingRichard C.SchramSanford. 2011. Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
SossJoe. 1999. Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. American Political Science Review93 (2): 363–80.
32.
SossJoeSchramSanford. 2007. A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback. American Political Science Review101 (1): 111–27.
33.
TaberCharlesLodgeMilton. 2006. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science50 (July): 755–69.
34.
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). 2016. Interactive Data: GDP and Personal Income: Regional Date: Local Area Personal Income and Employment: Personal Current Transfer Receipts (CA35). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Available from https://apps.bea.gov/itable/iTable.cfm?ReqID=70&step=1.
35.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay LehmanBradyHenry E.1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
