Efforts to align educational assessments with the sociocultural foundations of learning and with instruction are limited because we lack evidence of how such systems can be developed and maintained in inherently complex educational settings. Credible use cases are helpful to developing the evidence base, and we present one here: a research-practice partnership between a university and a large urban school district. The goals of our codesigned system include supporting the redistribution of educational opportunities in science classrooms (equity) and supporting and repairing students’ self-perceptions as agents of knowing and reasoning in science classrooms and in the community (epistemic justice). We describe components of the partnership and educational practices that work together to accomplish these aims: curricula with embedded assessments allowing students to figure out rather than be told core ideas, exit tickets that elicit students’ classroom experience, and an instructional guidance system focused on iterative refinement of teacher learning opportunities to support student agency.
AguiarOrlando G.MortimerEduardoScottPhil. 2010. Learning from and responding to students’ questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension. Journal of Research in Science Teaching47 (2): 174–93.
2.
AndersonElizabeth. 2006. The epistemology of democracy. Episteme3 (1–2): 8–22.
3.
AndersonElisabeth. 2012. Epistemic justice as a virtue of social institutions. Social Epistemology26 (2): 163–73.
4.
BellPhilTzouCarrieBrickerLeah A.BainesAnnemarie D.2012. Learning in diversities of structures of social practice: Accounting for how, why, and where people learn science. Human Development55:269–84.
5.
BittnerKurtSpenceIan. 2003. Use case modeling. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
BlackPaulWiliamDylan. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education5 (1): 7–74.
7.
BrownBryan A.RyooKelly. 2008. Teaching science as a language: A “content-first” approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching45 (5): 529–53.
8.
BrykAnthony S.GomezLouis M.GrunowAliciaLeMahieuPaul G.2015. Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BucciarelliLouis L.1994. Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
CarloneHeidi B.2004. The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching41 (4): 392–414.
11.
CarloneHeidi B.Haun-FrankJulieWebbAngela. 2011. Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching48 (5): 459–85.
12.
CoburnCoburn E.PenuelWilliam R.2016. Research-practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questionsEducational Researcher45 (1): 48–54.
13.
CockburnAlistair. 2000. Writing effective use cases. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional.
14.
CohenDavid K.MehtaJal. 2017. Why reform sometimes succeeds: Understanding the conditions that produce reforms that last. American Educational Research Journal54 (4): 644–90.
15.
DoriYehudit J.HerscovitzOrit. 1999. Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching36:411–30.
16.
DotsonKristie. 2014. Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology28 (2): 115–38.
17.
EngleRandi A.2012. The productive disciplinary engagement framework: Origins, key concepts, and developments. In Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning, ed. DaiDavid Y.161–200. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
Esteban-GuitartMoisèsMollLuis. 2014. Funds of identity: A new concept based on the Funds of Knowledge approach. Culture & Psychology20 (1): 31–48.
19.
FishmanBarry J.PenuelWilliam R.AllenAnna-RuthChengBritte H.SabelliNora. 2013. Design-based implementation research: An emerging model for transforming the relationship of research and practice. In Design-based implementation research. National Society for the Study of Education yearbook, eds. FishmanBarry J.PenuelWilliam R.AllenAnna-RuthChengBritte H., 136–56. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
20.
FordMichael J.2008. Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education92 (3): 404–23.
21.
FordTimothy G.Van SickleMary ElizabethClarkLynn V.Fazio-BrunsonMichelleSchweenDorothy C.2017. Teacher self-efficacy, professional commitment, and high-stakes teacher evaluation policy in Louisiana. Educational Policy31 (2): 202–48.
22.
FrickerMiranda. 2009. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
GonzálezNormaAndradeRoyCivilMartaMollLuis. 2001. Bridging funds of distributed knowledge: Creating zones of practices in mathematics. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk6 (1–2): 115–32.
24.
González-HowardMariaMcNeillKatherine L.2016. Learning in a community of practice: Factors impacting English-learning students’ engagement in scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching53 (4): 527–53.
25.
HincheyPatricia H.2010. Getting teacher assessment right: What policymakers can learn from research. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.
26.
JacobsonIvarChristersonMagnusJonssonPatrikÖvergaardGunnar. 1992. Object-oriented software engineering: A use case driven approach. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
JacucciGianniCalzàDiegoDandreaVincenzo. 2002. Use of use cases in design for end user design in use. Trento, Italy: Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trent.
28.
KensingFinnGreenbaumJoan. 2013. Heritage: Having a say. In Routledge international handbook of participatory design, eds. SimonsenJesperRobertsonToni, 21–36. London: Routledge.
29.
KingstonNealNashBarbara. 2011. Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice30 (4): 28–37.
KrajcikJoseph S.CodereSusanDahsahChanyahBayerReneeMunKongju. 2014. Planning instruction to meet the intent of the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education25 (2): 157–75.
32.
Ladson-BillingsGloria. 1995. Toward a theory of culturally-relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal32 (3): 465–91.
33.
Langer-OsunaJennifer M.NasirNa’ilah. 2016. Rehumanizing the “other”: Race, culture, and identity in education research. Review of Research in Education40:723–43.
34.
LaveJean. 2012. Changing practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity19 (2): 156–71.
LucasDeborahBroderickNicholeLehrerRichardBohananRobert. 2005. Making the grounds of scientific inquiry visible in the classroom. Science Scope29 (3): 39–42.
38.
ManzEveSuárezEnrique. 2018. Supporting teachers to negotiate uncertainty for science, students, and teaching. Science Education102 (4): 771–95.
39.
MillerEmily C.ManzEveRussRosemary S.StroupeDavidBerlandLeema. 2018. Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching55 (7): 1053–75.
40.
MinstrellJamesvan ZeeEmily. 2003. Using questioning to assess and foster student thinking. In Everyday assessment in the science classroom, eds. AtkinJ. MyronCoffeeJanet, 61–74. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
41.
MislevyRobert J.2019. Advances in measurement and cognition. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
42.
MollLuis C.AmantiCathyNeffDeborahGonzálezNorma. 1992. Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice31:132–41.
43.
NasirNa’ilah S.HandVictoria. 2008. From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences17 (2): 143–79.
44.
National Research Council. 2012. A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
45.
NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
46.
ParisDjango. 2012. Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher41 (3): 93–97.
47.
PenuelWilliam R.2016. Studying science and engineering learning in practice. Cultural Studies of Science Education11 (1): 89–104.
48.
PenuelWilliam R.2017. Selecting anchoring phenomena for equitable 3D teaching. Paper presented at the Colorado Science Education Network, Boulder, CO.
49.
PenuelWilliam R.ClarkTiffany R.BevanBronwyn. 2016. Designing for equitable learning across settings. Afterschool Matters24:13–20.
50.
PenuelWilliam R.ShepardLorrie A.2016a. Assessment and teaching. In Handbook of research on teaching, eds. GitomerDrew H.BellCourtney A.787–851. Washington, DC: AERA.
51.
PenuelWilliam R.ShepardLori A.2016b. Sociocognitive and sociocultural models of assessment. In Cognitive models of assessment, eds. RuppAndré A.LeightonJacqueline P., 146–73. New York, NY: Wiley.
52.
PenuelWilliam R.Van HorneKatieJacobsJennifer J.TurnerMichael. 2018. Developing a validity argument for practical measures of student experience in project-based science classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
53.
PenuelWilliam R.Van HorneKatieSeveranceSamQuigleyDavidSumnerTamara. 2016. Students’ responses to curricular activities as indicator of coherence in project-based science. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, vol. 2, eds. LooiChee-KitPolmanJoseph L.CressUlrikeReimannPeter, 855–58. Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
54.
ReiserBrian J.NovakMichaelMcGillTara A. W.2017. Coherence from the students’ perspective: Why the vision of the Framework for K-12 Science Education requires more than simply combining three dimensions of science learning. Paper presented at the Board on Science Education Workshop on Instructional Materials for the Next Generation Science Standards, Washington, DC.
55.
RogoffBarbara. 2003. The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56.
RoseberyAnnWarrenBethTucker-RaymondEli. 2016. Developing interpretive power in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching53 (10): 1571–1600.
57.
SchwarzChristina V.PassmoreCynthiaReiserBrian J.2017. Moving beyond “knowing about” science to making sense of the world. In Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices, eds. SchwarzChristina V.PassmoreCynthiaReiserBrian J.3–21. Washington, DC: NSTA.
58.
SeveranceSamPenuelWilliam R.SumnerTamaraLearyHeather. 2016. Organizing for teacher agency in curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences25 (4): 531–64.
59.
ShepardLorrie A.2019. Classroom assessment to support teaching and learning. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
60.
ShepardLorrie A.PenuelWilliam R.PellegrinoJames W.2018. Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment, grading practices, and large-scale assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice37 (1): 21–34.
61.
TanEdnaBartonAngela Calabrese. 2012. Empowering science and mathematics education in urban schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
62.
TrevelyanJames. 2010. Reconstructing engineering from practice. Engineering Studies2 (3): 175–95.
63.
WeizmanAyeletShwartzYaelFortusDavid. 2008. The driving question board: A visual organizer for project-based science. The Science Teacher75 (8): 33–37.
64.
ZivicAliciaSmithJames F.ReiserBrian J.EdwardsKelsey D.NovakMichaelMcGillTara A. W.2018. Negotiating epistemic agency and target learning goals: Supporting coherence from the students’ perspective. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, vol. 1, eds. KayJudithLuckinRose, 25–32. London: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
