Recent research highlights the importance of academic achievement as a determinant of economic well-being. Individual earnings, income growth in states, and national growth rates for GDP are each significantly determined by the population’s cognitive skills, which in turn are proxied by scores on standardized achievement tests. This well-documented relationship between education and economic outcomes underscores the importance of using test information to guide both school policy and school operations. While test-based accountability has been controversial, scientific evidence about the economic value of school improvement and about the efficacy of various accountability approaches points to holding schools and teachers accountable for their contributions to the academic performance of students.
BergbauerAnnika B.HanushekEric A.WoessmannLudger. 2018. Testing. NBER Working Paper 24836, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
2.
BoydDonGrossmanPamLankfordHamiltonLoebSusannaWyckoffJames. 2006. How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy1 (2): 176–216.
3.
BranchGregory F.HanushekEric A.RivkinSteven G.2012. Estimating the effect of leaders on public sector productivity: The case of school principals. NBER Working Paper W17803, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
4.
HenryBraunChudowskyNaomiKoenigJudith, eds. 2010. Getting value out of value-added: Report of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
5.
BraunHenry I.SingerJudith D.2019. Assessment for monitoring of education systems: International comparisons. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
6.
CarnoyMartinLoebSusanna. 2002. Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis24 (4): 305–31.
7.
ChettyRajFriedmanJohn N.RockoffJonah. 2014. Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review104 (9): 2633–79.
8.
ChettyRajFriedmanJohn N.RockoffJonah. 2016. Using lagged outcomes to evaluate bias in value-added models. American Economic Review105 (5): 393–99.
9.
ColemanJames S.CampbellErnest Q.HobsonCarol J.McPartlandJamesMoodAlexander M.WeinfeldFrederic D.YorkRobert L.1966. Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
10.
CrossChristopher T.2014. Political education: Setting the course for state and federal policy. 2nd ed.New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
11.
CunhaFlavioHeckmanJames J.2008. Formulating, identifying and estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Journal of Human Resources43 (4): 738–82.
12.
DeeThomas S.JacobBrian A.2011. The impact of No Child Left Behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management30 (3): 418–46.
13.
DeeThomas S.WyckoffJames. 2015. Incentives, selection, and teacher performance: Evidence from IMPACT. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management34 (2): 267–97.
14.
DeeThomas S.WyckoffJames. 2017. A lasting impact: High-stakes teacher evaluations drive student success in Washington, DC. Education Next17 (4): 58–66.
15.
DemingDavid J.2011. Better schools, less crime?Quarterly Journal of Economics126 (4): 2063–2115.
16.
DemingDavid J.2017. The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics132 (4): 1593–1640.
17.
FahleErin M.ShearBenjamin R.ShoresKenneth A.2019. Assessment for monitoring of education systems: The U.S. example. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
18.
FeuerMichael J.2012. No country left behind: Rhetoric and reality of international large-scale assessment. The 13th William H. Angoff Memorial Lecture. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
19.
FeuerMichael J.FlodenRobert E.ChudowskyNaomiAhnJudie. 2013. Evaluation of teacher preparation programs: Purposes, methods, and policy options. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
20.
FiglioDavidLoebSusanna. 2011. School accountability. In Handbook of the economics of education, vol. 3. eds. HanushekEric A.MachinStephenWoessmannLudger, 383–421. Amsterdam: North Holland.
21.
FinnChester E.Jr.MannoBruno V.VanourekGregg. 2000. Charter schools in action: Renewing public education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
GaretMichael S.CronenStephanieEatonMarianKurkiAnjaLudwigMeredithJonesWehmahUekawaKazuakiFalkAudreyBloomHoward S.DoolittleFredZhuPeiSztejnbergLaura. 2008. The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
23.
GaretMichael S.WayneAndrew J.StancavageFranTaylorJamesEatonMarianWaltersKirkSongMengliBrownSethHurlburtStevenZhuPeiSepanikSusanDoolittleFred. 2011. Middle school mathematics professional development impact study: Findings after the second year of implementation. NCEE 2011-4024. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
24.
GrissomJason A.KalogridesDemetraLoebSusanna. 2015. Using student test scores to measure principal performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis37 (1): 3–28.
25.
HaertelEdward H.2013. Reliability and validity of inferences about teachers based on student test scores. William H. Angoff Memorial Lecture. Princeton, NJ: Education Testing Service.
26.
HanushekEric A.1971. Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement: Estimation using micro data. American Economic Review60 (2): 280–88.
27.
HanushekEric A.2002. Publicly provided education. In Handbook of public economics, vol. 4, eds. AuerbachAlan J.FeldsteinMartin2045–2141. Amsterdam: North Holland.
28.
HanushekEric A.2011a. The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review30 (3): 466–79.
29.
HanushekEric A.2011b. Valuing teachers: How much is a good teacher worth?Education Next11 (3): 40–45.
30.
HanushekEric A.2012. Grinding the antitesting ax: More bias than evidence behind NRC panel’s conclusions. Education Next12 (2): 49–55.
31.
HanushekEric A.KimkoDennis D.2000. Schooling, labor force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review90 (5): 1184–1208.
32.
HanushekEric A.PetersonPaul E.WoessmannLudger. 2013. Endangering prosperity: A global view of the American school. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
33.
HanushekEric A.PiopiunikMarcWiederholdSimon. Forthcoming. The value of smarter teachers: International evidence on teacher cognitive skills and student performance. Journal of Human Resources.
34.
HanushekEric A.RaymondMargaret E.2005. Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management24 (2): 297–327.
35.
HanushekEric A.RivkinSteven G.2010. Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review100 (2): 267–71.
36.
HanushekEric A.RivkinSteven G.2012. The distribution of teacher quality and implications for policy. Annual Review of Economics4:131–57.
37.
HanushekEric A.RuhoseJensWoessmannLudger. 2016. It pays to improve school quality: States that boost student achievement could reap large economic gains. Education Next16 (3): 16–24.
38.
HanushekEric A.RuhoseJensWoessmannLudger. 2017a. Economic gains from educational reform by U.S. states. Journal of Human Capital11 (4): 447–86.
39.
HanushekEric A.RuhoseJensWoessmannLudger. 2017b. Knowledge capital and aggregate income differences: Development accounting for U.S. states. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics9 (4): 184–224.
40.
HanushekEric A.SchwerdtGuidoWiederholdSimonWoessmannLudger. 2015. Returns to skills around the world: Evidence from PIAAC. European Economic Review73:103–30.
41.
HanushekEric A.SchwerdtGuidoWiederholdSimonWoessmannLudger. 2017. Coping with change: International differences in the returns to skills. Economic Letters153:15–19.
42.
HanushekEric A.WoessmannLudger. 2011. The economics of international differences in educational achievement. In Handbook of the economics of education, vol. 3, eds. HanushekEric A.MachinStephenWoessmannLudger, 89–200. Amsterdam: North Holland.
43.
HanushekEric A.WoessmannLudger. 2012. Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation. Journal of Economic Growth17 (4): 267–321.
44.
HanushekEric A.WoessmannLudger. 2015a. The knowledge capital of nations: Education and the economics of growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
HanushekEric A.WoessmannLudger. 2015b. Universal basic skills: What countries stand to gain. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
46.
Frederick M.HessMcShaneMichael Q., eds. 2014. Common core meets education reform: What it all means for politics, policy, and the future of schooling. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
47.
MichaelHoutElliottStuart W., eds. 2011. Incentives and test-based accountability in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
48.
JacksonC. KiraboRockoffJonah E.StaigerDouglas O.2014. Teacher effects and teacher related policies. Annual Review of Economics6:801–25.
49.
KaneThomas J.McCaffreyDaniel F.MillerTreyStaigerDouglas O.2013. Have we identified effective teachers? Validating measures of effective teaching using random assignment. Seattle, WA: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
50.
KaneThomas J.RockoffJonah E.StaigerDouglas O.2008. What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review27 (6): 615–31.
51.
KoedelCoryMihalyKataRockoffJonah E.2015. Value-added modeling: A review. Economics of Education Review47:180–95.
52.
KoretzDaniel. 2017. The testing charade: Pretending to make schools better. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Robin J.Lake, ed. 2008. Hopes, fears, and reality: A balanced look at American charter schools in 2008. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington Bothell.
54.
Henry M.Levin, ed. 2001. Privatizing education: Can the marketplace deliver choice, efficiency, equity, and social cohesion?Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
55.
LevineRossReneltDavid. 1992. A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. American Economic Review82 (4): 942–63.
56.
LevineRossZervosSara J.1993. What we have learned about policy and growth from cross-country regressions. American Economic Review83 (2): 426–30.
57.
LinnRobert L.2005. Conflicting demands of No Child Left Behind and state systems: Mixed messages about school performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives13 (33).
58.
MendroRobert L.JordanHeather R.GomezElviaAndersonMark C.BembryKaren L.1998. An application of multiple linear regression in determining longitudinal teacher effectiveness. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, San Diego, CA.
59.
MincerJacob. 1970. The distribution of labor incomes: a survey with special reference to the human capital approach. Journal of Economic Literature8 (1): 1–26.
60.
MincerJacob. 1974. Schooling, experience, and earnings. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
61.
MorganAndrewNguyenMinh ThacHanushekEric A.OstBenRivkinSteve G.2018. Getting effective educators in schools serving disadvantaged students. Paper presented at Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC.
62.
MurnaneRichard J.1975. Impact of school resources on the learning of inner city children. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
63.
MurnaneRichard J.WillettJohn B.LevyFrank. 1995. The growing importance of cognitive skills in wage determination. Review of Economics and Statistics77:251–66.
64.
National Council on Teacher Quality. 2017. State teacher policy yearbook, 2017. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
65.
Office of the District of Columbia Auditor. 2014. Trends in teacher effectiveness in the District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS). DC Public Education Reform Amendment Act (PERAA) Report no. 3, part I. Washington, DC: The Education Consortium for Research and Evaluation (EdCORE), George Washington University.
66.
PritchettLant. 2006. Does learning to add up add up? The returns to schooling in aggregate data. In Handbook of the economics of education, eds. HanushekEric A.WelchFinis, 635–95. Amsterdam: North Holland.
67.
RavitchDiane. 2010. The myth of charter schools. New York Review of Books, November11.
68.
RothsteinJesse. 2017. Measuring the impacts of teachers: Comment. American Economic Review107 (6): 1656–84.
69.
Sala-i-MartinXavierDoppelhoferGernotMillerRonald I.2004. Determinants of long-term growth: A Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach. American Economic Review94 (4): 813–35.
70.
SandersWilliam L.HornSandra P.1994. The Tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS): Mixed-model methodology in educational assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education8:299–311.
71.
SingerJudith D.BraunHenry I.ChudowskyNaomi eds. 2018. International education assessments: Cautions, conundrums, and common sense. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
72.
TNTP. 2012. The irreplaceables: Understanding the real retention crisis in America’s urban schools. New York, NY: The New Teachers Project.
73.
TyackDavid B.1974. The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
VinovskisMaris A.2019. History of testing in the United States: PK–12 education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
75.
WeisbergDanielSextonSusanMulhernJenniferKeelingDavid. 2009. The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. 2nd ed.New York, NY: The New Teachers Project.
