Abstract
This article synthesizes research on regulatory measures to prevent crime, examining the actors, contexts, and methods of regulation, along with associated costs, impacts, and unintended consequences. I find that to successfully combat crime, regulatory measures need to be adaptable to the specific crime and its situational context; germane to both the actors intended to invoke, enforce, and respond to the regulation and to the geographic and jurisdictional context of the crime; incentive-based to encourage compliance; legitimate and equitable in imposition and impact; and evaluated, using evidence during and after implementation to document unintended impacts, costs, and benefits. I use the acronym AGILE as shorthand for these successful regulatory schemes. I conclude that the policy implications of AGILE regulatory reforms can yield more cost-efficient and equitable criminal justice outcomes when they are properly developed, implemented, and incentivized.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
