Cybercrimes, or offenses enabled by technology, affect computer systems and people and prove difficult to pursue through traditional criminal justice strategies due to jurisdictional challenges and legal hurdles. As a result, corporations and industry have begun to play a role in mitigating various forms of cybercrime. This article examines what constitutes cybercrime and the successes and limitations of law enforcement in combatting these offenses. I present a detailed discussion of efforts by industry and regulatory bodies to deter cybercrime. Finally, I consider and discuss the risks and challenges that traditional criminal justice system operations face moving forward.
BocijPaul. 2004. Cyberstalking: Harassment in the Internet age and how to protect your family. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
5.
BosslerAdam M.HoltThomas J.2009. On-line activities, guardianship, and malware infection: An examination of routine activities theory. International Journal of Cyber Criminology3:400–420.
6.
BosslerAdam M.HoltThomas J.2012. Patrol officers’ perceived role in responding to cybercrime. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management35:165–81.
7.
BrennerSusan W.2008. Cyberthreats: The emerging fault lines of the nation state. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
BrennerSusan W.2011. Defining cybercrime: A review of federal and state law. In Cybercrime: The investigation, prosecution, and defense of a computer-related crime, 3rd ed., ed. CliffordRobert. D.15–104. Raleigh, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
9.
BritzMarjorie T.2010. Terrorism and technology: Operationalizing cyberterrorism and identifying concepts. In Crime on-line: Correlates, causes, and context, ed. HoltThomas J., 193–220. Raleigh, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
10.
BrodkinJon. 28March2012. Security researchers kill Kelihos again after Bitcoin crime spree. ArsTechnicha. Available from http://arstechnica.com.
CrossCassandra. 2015. No laughing matter: Blaming the victim of online fraud. International Review of Victimology21:187–204.
13.
CunninghamScottKendallTodd D.2010. Sex for sale: Online commerce in the world’s oldest profession. In Crime online: Correlates, causes, and context, ed. HoltThomas J., 114–40. Raleigh, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
DurkinKeith F.BryantClifton D.1999. Propagandizing pederasty: A thematic analysis of the online exculpatory accounts of unrepentant pedophiles. Deviant Behavior20:103–27.
16.
EdelsonEve. 2003. The 419 scam: Information warfare on the spam front and a proposal for local filtering. Computers and Security22 (5): 392–401.
17.
Europol. 2017a. International operation targets customers of counter anti-virus and crypter services: 6 arrested and 36 interviewed. Available from https://www.europol.europa.eu.
18.
Europol. 2017b. Network of payment card fraudsters dismantled: 3,000 victims lost at least 5000 Euro. Available from https://www.europol.europa.eu.
19.
Europol. 2017c. Online sexual coercion and extortion as a form of crime affecting children: Law enforcement perspective. Available from https://www.europol.europa.eu.
FurnellSteven. 2002. Cybercrime: Vandalizing the information society. London: Addison-Wesley.
22.
GoldmanEric. 30July2016. Overzealous legislative effort against online prostitution ads at Backpage fails, providing a big win for user-generated content. Forbes. Available from http://www.forbes.com.
23.
GoodmanMarc D.1997. Why the police don’t care about computer crime. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology10:465–94.
GuynnJessica. 19June2015. Google to remove “revenge porn” from search results. USA TODAY. Available from https://www.usatoday.com.
26.
GuynnJessica. 16November2016. Twitter suspends alt-right accounts. USA TODAY. Available from https://www.usatoday.com.
27.
HicksJesse. 30April2012. Down the sinkhole: Inside the Kelihos. B takedown: How to kill a botnet. The Verge. Available from http://www.theverge.com.
28.
HigginsGeorge E.MarcumCatherine D.2011. Digital piracy: An integrated theoretical approach. Raleigh, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
29.
HindujaSameer. 2004. Perceptions of local and state law enforcement concerning the role of computer crime investigative teams. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management3:341–57.
30.
HindujaSameer. 2007. Computer crime investigations in the United States: Leveraging knowledge from the past to address the future. International Journal of Cyber Criminology1:1–26.
31.
HindujaSameerPatchinJustin W.2009. Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior29 (2): 129–56.
32.
HoltThomas J.2013. Examining the forces shaping cybercrime markets online. Social Science Computer Review31:165–77.
33.
HoltThomas J.BlevinsKristie R.2007. Examining sex work from the client’s perspective: Assessing johns using online data. Deviant Behavior28:333–54.
34.
HoltThomas J.BosslerAdam M.2012. Predictors of patrol officer interest in cybercrime training and investigation in selected United States police departments. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking15:464–72.
35.
HoltThomas J.BosslerAdam M.2016. Cybercrime in progress: Theory and prevention of technology-enabled offenses. London: Routledge.
36.
HoltThomas J.BosslerAdam M.FitzgeraldSarah. 2010. Examining state and local law enforcement perceptions of computer crime. In Crime on-line: Correlates, causes, and context, ed. HoltThomas J. 221–46. Raleigh, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
MarcumCatherineHigginsGeorge E.2011. Combating child exploitation online: Predictors of successful ICAC task forces. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice5:310–16.
46.
MarcumCatherine D.HigginsGeorge E.FreiburgerTina L.RickettsMelissa L.2010. Policing possession of child pornography online: Investigating the training and resources dedicated to the investigation of cyber crime. International Journal of Police Science & Management12:516–25.
47.
McDougallLiz. 6May2012. Backpage.com is an ally in the fight against human trafficking. Seattle Times. Available from http://seattletimes.nwsource.com.
National Institute of Justice. 2008. Electronic crime scene investigations: A guide for first responders, 2nd ed.Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
51.
NazarioJose. 2003. Defense and detection strategies against Internet worms. Norwood, MA: Artech House.
NhanJohnny. 2013. The evolution of online piracy: Challenge and response. In Crime on-line: Causes, correlates, and context, ed. HoltT. J.61–80. Raleigh, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
54.
PERF. 2014. The role of local law enforcement agencies in preventing and investigating cybercrime. Police Executive Research Forum: Critical Issues in Policing Series. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
55.
QuinnJames F.ForsythCraig J.2013. Red light districts on blue screens: A typology for understanding the evolution of deviant communities on the Internet. Deviant Behavior34:579–85.
ReitmanRainey. 2015. Caving to government pressure, Visa and MasterCard shut down payments to Backpage.com. EFF. Available from https://www.eff.org.
58.
ReynsBradford W.HensonBillyFisherBonnie S.2012. Stalking in the twilight zone: Extent of cyberstalking victimization and offending among college students. Deviant Behavior33:1–25.
59.
RobertsJoshua W.HuntScott A.2012. Social control in a sexually deviant cybercommunity: A cappers’ code of conduct. Deviant Behavior33:757–73.
60.
SanchoDavidLinkRoainer. 2013. Trend Micro sinkholes and eliminates a ZeuS botnet C&C. Security Intelligence Blog. Available from http://blog.trendmicro.com.
61.
SchellBernadette H.DodgeJohn L.2002. The hacking of America: Who’s doing it, why, and how. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
62.
SenjoScott R.2004. An analysis of computer-related crime: Comparing police officer perceptions with empirical data. Security Journal17:55–71.
StambaughHollisBeaupreDavid S.IcoveDavid J.BakerRichardCassadyWayneWilliamsWayne P.2001. Electronic crime needs assessment for state and local law enforcement. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
65.
StewartChristopher S.MaremontMark. 13April2016. Twitter and Islamic State deadlock on social media battlefield. The Wall Street Journal. Available from https://www.wsj.com.
66.
SunshineJasonTylerTom R.2003. The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review37 (3): 513–48.
WallDavid. S.2001. Cybercrimes and the Internet. In Crime and the Internet, ed. WallD. S.1–17. New York, NY: Routledge.
75.
WallDavid. 2004. Digital realism and the governance of spam as cybercrime. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research10:309–35.
76.
WallDavid S.WilliamsMatthew L.2013. Policing cybercrime: Networked and social media technologies and the challenges for policing. Policing and Society23:409–12.
77.
WeimannGabriel. 2005. How modern terrorism uses the Internet. Journal of International Security Affairs8:1–8.
78.
WillitsDaleNowackiJeffrey. 2016. The use of specialized cybercrime policing units: An organizational analysis. Criminal Justice Studies29:105–24.
79.
WolakJanisFinkelhorDavidMitchellKimberly J.2012. Trends in arrest for child pornography production: The Third National Juvenile Online Victimization Study (NJOV-3). Available from https://scholars.unh.edu.
80.
YadronDanny. 5February2016. Twitter deletes 125,000 Isis accounts and expands anti-terror teams. The Guardian. Available from https://www.theguardian.com.
81.
YarMajid. 2013. Cybercrime and society, 2nd ed.London: Sage Publications.
82.
ZetterKim. 1July2013. 9 years after Shadowcrew, Feds get their hands on fugitive cybercrook. Wired. Available from http://www.wired.com.
