Foundations are actively engaged in supporting evidence-based policymaking through collaborative funding, supporting, and creating intermediary organizations; building the infrastructure needed to support evidence-based policymaking; and improving the relevance of research for practice and policy. For a variety of reasons, they are shifting from a focus on the federal government and the identification of effective brand name innovations to an emphasis on supporting local actors to design and test solutions using local data. This article provides examples of foundation work, describes and discusses how and why it is evolving, and uses historical examples to place the change in context.
BellCourtney A.GitomerDrew H.McCaffreyDaniel F.HamreBridget K.PiantaRobert C.QiYi. 2012. An argument approach to observation protocol validity. Educational Assessment17 (2–3): 62–87.
2.
BloomHoward S.2005. Randomizing groups to evaluate place-based programs. In Learning more from social experiments: Evolving analytic approaches, ed. BloomHoward S., 115–72. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
3.
BloomHoward S.RaudenbushStephen W.WeissMichael J.PorterKristin. 2016. Using multisite experiments to study cross-site variation in treatment effects: A hybrid approach with fixed intercepts and a random treatment coefficient. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness10 (4): 817–42.
4.
BrykAnthony S.GomezLouis M.GrunowAliciaLeMahieuPaul G.2015. Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
5.
CantrellStevenKaneThomas J.2013. Ensuring fair and reliable measures of effective teaching: Culminating findings from the MET Project’s three-year study. ERIC Document Reproduction Service no. ED540958. Seattle, WA: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
6.
Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. 2015. Coalition guides to research/evaluation and evidence-based programs. Washington, DC: Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. Available from http://coalition4evidence.org/468-2/publications/.
7.
DuckworthAngela L.YeagerDavid Scott. 2015. Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher44 (4): 237–51.
8.
GreeneJay P.2015. Buckets into another sea. In The new education philanthropy: Politics, policy, and reform, eds. HessFrederick M.HenigJeffrey R., 11–28. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
9.
GueronJudithRolstonHoward. 2013. Fighting for reliable evidence. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
10.
HaskinsRonMargolisGreg. 2014. Show me the evidence: Obama’s fight for rigor and results in social policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11.
Kinder Institute for Urban Research. 2016. About the national network of education research-practice partnerships. Available from http://nnerpp.rice.edu/about/.
MartinezAndresRaudenbushStephen W.2008. Measuring and improving program quality: Reliability and statistical power. In Toward positive youth development: Transforming schools and community programs, eds. ShinMarybethYoshikawaHirokazu, 333–49. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
RaudenbushStephenBloomHoward. 2015. Learning about and from a distribution of program impacts using multisite trials. American Journal of Evaluation36 (4): 475–99.
16.
RaudenbushStephen W.MartinezAndresSpybrookJessaca. 2007. Strategies for improving precision in group-randomized experiments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis29 (1): 5–29.
17.
ReckhowSarah. 2015. Follow the money: How foundation dollars change public school practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
RussakoffDale. 2015. The prize: Who’s in charge of America’s schools?New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
19.
Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis. 2016. Overview. Stanford Education Data Archive. Stanford, CA: Stanford Graduate School of Education. Available at https://cepa.stanford.edu/seda/overview.
20.
WeissMichael J.BloomHoward S.BrockThomas. 2014. A conceptual framework for studying the sources of variation in program effects. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management33 (3): 778–808.
21.
WujcikAnne. 13November2015. Redesigning high school. EdNET Insight.
