“The law” is too often viewed as an impenetrable barrier to the use of administrative data to create and evaluate evidence-based policy. There are various reasons for this, including complexities of the law, organizational and cultural norms in government agencies that restrict data sharing, a lack of adequate legal expertise among potential data providers, and a lack of political support for the use of administrative data. However, an emerging political consensus on the importance of the use of administrative data, growing interest among funders, and efforts to create resources for lawyers working in this field provide a foundation for a fundamental shift in attitude about “the law,” making the law an essential tool to data sharing and use, rather than a barrier to these efforts.
Actionable Intelligence for Social Policy. March2017. IDS governance: Setting up for ethical and effective use. Actionable Intelligence for Social Policy expert panel report. Available from https://www.aisp.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Governance.pdf (accessed 3 June 2017).
BernardTara SiegelHsuTiffanyPerlrothNicoleLieberRon. 7September2017. Equifax says cyberattack may have affected 143 million in the U.S. New York Times.
4.
BozemanBarryKingsleyGordon. 1998. Risk culture in public and private organizations. Public Administration Review58 (2): 109–18.
Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking. 2017. The promise of evidence-based policymaking: Report of the Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking. Washington DC: Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking.
7.
ConnellyRoxannePlayfordChristopher J.GayleVernonDibbenChris. 2016. The role of administrative data in the big data revolution in social science research. Social Science Research59:1–12.
8.
CulhaneDennisFantuzzoJohnHillMatthewBurnettT.C.2018. Maximizing the use of integrated data systems: Understanding the challenges and advancing solutions. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
9.
FullerMathewWalkerDaniel. 2013. Acts influencing how higher education handles information. Journal of Higher Education Management28:26–40.
10.
GarfinkelSimson L.2018. Privacy and security concerns when social scientists work with administrative and operational data. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
11.
GoergeRobert M.2018. Barriers to accessing state data and approaches to addressing them. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
12.
GoldsmithStephen. 23February2017. How Illinois’ CIO got buy-in for the state’s data sharing agreement. Government Technology. Available from http://www.govtech.com.
13.
GuthrieJennifer. 2003. Time is running out—The burdens and challenges of HIPAA compliance: A look at preemption analysis, the “minimum necessary” standard, and the notice of privacy practices. Annals of Health Law12:143–77.
14.
HodgeJames. 2012. National health information privacy and the new federalism. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy14:791–820.
15.
HollenbeckKevinHuangWei-Jang. 2017. Net impact and benefit-cost estimates of the workforce development system in Washington State. Employment Research24 (1): 1–4.
16.
HotzV. JosephGoergeRobertBalzekasJulieMargolinFrancis, eds. 1998. Administrative data for policy-relevant research: Assessment of current utility and recommendations for development. A report of the panel on research uses of administrative data of the Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research. Available from http://public.econ.duke.edu/~vjh3/working_papers/adm_data.pdf.
LiebmanJeffrey B.2018. Using data to more rapidly address difficult U.S. social problems. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
19.
McNabbJenniferTimmonsDavidSongJaePuckettCarolyn. 2009. Use of administrative data at the Social Security Administration. Social Security Bulletin69 (1): 75–84.
20.
MurrayCharles. 1984/2015. Losing ground: American social policy, 1950–1980. New York, NY: Basic Books.
21.
NakashimaEllen. 9July2015. Hacks of OPM databases compromised 22.1 million people, federal authorities say. Washington Post.
O’HaraAmyMedaliaCarla. 2018. Data sharing the federal statistical system: Impediments and possibilities. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
27.
OstromElinor. 2011. Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policies Studies Journal39:7–27.
PhelpsJosephNowakGlenFerrellElizabeth. 2000. Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing19:27–41.
30.
RubenfeldJed. 1989. The right of privacy. Harvard Law Review102:737–807.
31.
SiegelReva B.2015. How conflict entrenched the right to privacy. Yale Law Journal Forum124:316–23.
32.
SzalayAlexander S.2018. From SkyServer to SciServer. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
33.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1999. Mental health: A report of the surgeon general. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health.
34.
WinstonCliffordKarpilowQuentinBurkDavid. 2014. Lawyers’ self-selection to work in the public or private sector: Is government performance affected? University of Chicago Department of Economics Research Paper. Available from http://repository.law.umich.edu/alumni_survey_scholarship/27 (accessed 2 June 2017).
