Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Over the half century since the Coleman Report was issued, there has been an extensive debate among scholars, policy-makers, and the courts about the extent to which “money matters” in education. This article briefly reviews the relevant academic literature and then analyzes the forty state court education funding litigations that have considered whether there is a correlation between educational expenditures and improved student outcomes. I find that that there is now an overwhelming consensus that, of course, money matters—when it is used well. This result indicates that policy-makers and judges should shift from continuing a fruitless abstract discussion of whether money matters and concentrate instead on the significant accountability questions of what resources are needed to provide all students a meaningful educational opportunity and how these resources can best be used to maximize student success, especially for students from poverty backgrounds and students of color.

Keywords

education finance educational policy-making courts money matters Coleman Report

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Decisions in Which the Plaintiffs Prevailed

Abbeville Country School District v. the State of South Carolina, 767 S.E.2d 157 (S.C. 2014).

Abbott v. Burke, 575 A.2d 359 (N.J. 1990).

Alabama Coalition for Equity v. Hunt, 1993, aff’d, Ex Parte James, 713 So.2d 869 (1997).

Bradford v. Md. State Bd. of Educ., No. 94340058/CE189672 (Baltimore City Cir. Ct. 2000).

Brigham v. State, 692 A.2d 384 (Vt. 1997).

Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. State, 655 N.E.2d 161 (N.Y. 1995) ( “CFE I”).

Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. State, 801 N.E.2d 326 (N.Y. 2003) (“CFE II”).

Campbell County Sch. Dist. v. State, 907 P.2d 1238 (Wyo. 1995).

10.

Claremont Sch. Dist. v. Governor, 703 A.2d 1353 (N.H. 1997).

11.

Columbia Falls Elementary Sch. Dist. No. 6 v. State, 109 P.3d 257 (Mont. 2005).

12.

Conn. Coal for Justice in Educ. Funding, Inc. v. Rell, 990 A.2d 206 (Conn. 2010).

13.

DeRolph v. State, 667 N.E.2d 733 (Ohio 1997).

14.

Edgewood Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Kirby, 777 S.W.2d 391 (Tex. 1989).

15.

Hoke County Bd of Educ. v. State (N.C. 2004).

16.

Horton v. Meskill, 376 A.2d 359 (Conn. 1977).

17.

Idaho Schs. for Equal Educ. Opportunity, 976 P.2d 913 (Idaho 1998).

18.

Kasayulie v. State, No. 3AN-97-3782 (Alaska Super. Ct. Sept. 1, 1999).

19.

Leandro v. State of North Carolina 488 S.E. 2d 249 (N.C. 1997).

20.

Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee 91 S.W.3d 472 (Ark. 2002).

21.

McCleary v. State, 269 P.3d 227 (Wash. 2012).

22.

McDuffy v. Sec’y of the Exec. Office of Educ., 615 N.E.2d 516 (Mass. 1993).

23.

Montoy v. State, 120 P.3d 306 (Kan. 2005).

24.

Neely v. West-Orange Cove 176 S.W. 3d 746 (Tex. 2005).

25.

Pauley v. Bailey, 324 S.E.2d 128 (W. Va. 1984).

26.

Robinson v. Cahill, 303 A.2d 273, 277 (N.J. 1973).

27.

Roosevelt Elementary Sch. Dist. No. 66 v. Bishop, 887 P. 2d 806 (Ariz. 1994).

28.

Rose v. Council for Better Educ., 790 S.W.2d 186 (Ky. 1989).

29.

Seattle School District No. 1 v. State, 585 P.2d 71 (Wash. 1978).

30.

Serrano v. Priest, 487 P.2d 1241 (Cal. 1971).

31.

Tennessee Small Schools v. McWherter, 851 S.W.2d 139,144 (Tenn. 1993).

32.

Tomblin v. West Virginia State Board of Education, Civ. No. 75-1268 (2003).

33.

Zuni School District v. State of New Mexico, No. CV-98-14-ll (McKinley County Dist. Ct. Oct. 14, 1999).

34.

Decisions in Which the Defendants Prevailed

35.

Bonner v. Daniels, 907 N.E.2d 516 (Ind. 2009).

36.

City of Pawtucket v. Sundlun, 662 A.2d 40 (R.I. 1995)1995.

37.

Committee for Educational Rights v. Edgar, 672 N.E.2d 1178 (Ill. 1996).

38.

Crane Elementary School District v. State of Arizona (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006).

39.

Davis v. the State of South Dakota 804 N.W.2d 618 (S.D. 2011).

40.

Hancock v. Driscoll, 2004 WL 877984 (Mass. Super, 2004); rev’d.

41.

Hancock v. Commissioner of Education, 822 N.E.2d 1134 (Mass. 2005).

42.

Ex Parte James, 836 So.2d 813 (Ala. 2002).

43.

Levittown v. Nyquist, 439 N.E.2d 359 (N.Y. 1982).

44.

Lobato v. State of Colorado, 304 P.3d 1132 (Colo. 2013).

45.

Lujan v. Colorado State Board of Education 649 P.2d 1005 (Colo. 1992).

46.

Mc Daniel v. Thomas, 285 S.E. 2d 156 (Ga. 1981).

47.

Morath v. Texas Taxpayer and Student Fairness Coalition, 490 S.W.3d 826 (Tx. 2016).

48.

Marrero v. Commonwealth 739 A.2d 110 (Pa. 1999).

49.

San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1. (1973).

50.

Scott v. Commonwealth of Virginia 443 S.E.2d 138 (Va. 1994).

51.

Baker

Bruce D.

2016. Does money matter in education? 2nd ed. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute. Available from http://www.shankerinstitute.org/sites/shanker/files/moneymatters_edition2.pdf.

52.

Biddle

Brude J.

Berliner

David C.

2002. What research says about unequal funding for schools in America. Tempe, AZ: Education Policy Reports Project (EPRP).

53.

Borman

Geoffrey D.

Dowling

Maritza

. 2010. Schools and inequality: A multilevel analysis of Coleman’s equality of educational opportunity data. Teachers College Record 112 (5): 1201–46.

54.

Card

David

Krueger

Alan B.

1992. Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States. Journal of Political Economy 100 (1): 1–40.

55.

Coleman

James S.

1990. Equality and achievement in education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

56.

Coleman

James S.

Campbell

Ernest Q.

Hobson

Carol J.

McPartland

James

Mood

Alexander M.

Weinfeld

Frederic D.

York

Robert L.

1966. Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare and United States Office of Education.

57.

Cuomo

Andrew

. 5 January 2011. New York at a crossroads: A transformation plan for a new New York. State of the State Speech, Albany, NY. Available from https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/2011-state-state-transcript.

58.

Equity and Excellence Commission. 2013. For each and every child: A strategy for education equity and excellence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

59.

Goertz

Weiss

2009. Assessing success in school finance litigation: The case of New Jersey. New York, NY: Campaign for Educational Equity, Teachers College.

60.

Greenwald

Rob

Hedges

Larry V.

Laine

Richard D.

1996. The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research 66 (3): 361–96.

61.

Guthrie

James W.

1996. Implications for policy: What might happen in American education if it were known how money actually is spent. In Where does the money go? Resource allocation in elementary and secondary schools, eds. Picus

Lawrence O.

Wattenbarger

James L

, 253–68. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

62.

Hanushek

Eric A.

1991. When reform may not be good policy. Harvard Journal on Legislation 28 (2): 423–56.

63.

Hanushek

Eric A.

1996. The quest for equalized mediocrity: School finance reform without consideration of school performance. In Where does the money go? Resource allocation in elementary and secondary schools, eds. Picus

Lawrence O.

Wattenbarger

James L

, 20–43. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

64.

Hanushek

Eric A.

2011. The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economic Education Review 30:466–79.

65.

Hanushek

Eric A.

2016. What matters for student achievement. Education Next 16 (2): 18–26.

66.

Hanushek

Eric A.

2009. Schoolhouses, courthouses and statehouses: Solving the funding-achievement puzzle in America’s public schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

67.

Horowitz

Donald, L.

1977. The courts and social policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

68.

Hyman

Joshua

. 2014. Does money matter in the long run? Effects of school spending on educational attainment. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. Available from http://www.edpolicy.umich.edu.

69.

Jackson

C. Kirabo

Johnson

Rucker

Persico

Claudia

. 2014. The effect of school finance reforms on the distribution of spending, academic achievement, and adult outcomes. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 20118, Cambridge, MA.

70.

Kirp

David L.

2013. Improbable scholars: The rebirth of a great American school system and a strategy for America’s schools. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

71.

Klein

Alyson

Ujifusa

Andrew

. 2017. Trump calls nation’s schools “flush with cash, failing.” Education Week 36 (19): 18–19.

72.

Konstantopolous

Borman

Geoffrey

. 2011. Family background and school effects on student achievement: A multilevel analysis of the Coleman data. Teachers College Record 113 (1): 97–132.

73.

Konstantopoulos

Chun

2009. What are the long-term effects of small classes on the achievement gap? Evidence from the Lasting Benefits Study. American Journal of Education 116 (1): 125–54.

74.

Lafortune

Julien

Rothstein

Jesse

Schzenbach

Diane W.

2016. School finance reform and the distribution of student achievement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 22011, Cambridge, MA.

75.

Mosteller

Fredrick

Moynihan

Daniel P.

, eds. 1972. On equality of educational opportunity. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

76.

Newman

Anne

2013. Realizing educational rights: advancing school reform through courts and communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

77.

Nguyen-Hoang

Phuong

Yinger

John

. 2014. Education finance reform, local behavior, and student performance. Journal of Education Finance 39 (4): 297–322.

78.

Obhof

L. J.

2005. DeRolph v. State and Ohio’s long road to an adequate education. Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal 3 (1): 83–150.

79.

Rebell

Michael A.

2009. Courts and kids: Pursuing equal educational opportunity through the state courts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

80.

Schweinhart

L. J.

2003. Benefits, cost, and explanation of the High/Scope Perry Preschool Project. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Available from http://www.highscope.org/Research/PerryProject/Perry-SRCD_2003.pdf.

81.

Taylor

Corrine

. 1997. Does money matter? An empirical study introducing resource costs and student needs to education production function analysis. Madison, WI: Developments in U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Developments in School Finance. Available from http://nces.ed.gov.

82.

Wall Street Journal . 20 December 2000. More money? Editorial.

The Courts’ Consensus: Money Does Matter for Educational Opportunity

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References