The vast differences in summer learning activities among children present a substantial challenge to providing equal educational opportunity in the United States. Most initiatives aimed at reversing summer learning loss focus on school- or center-based programs. This study explores the potential of enabling parents to provide literacy development opportunities at home as a low-cost alternative. We conduct a randomized field trial of a summer text-messaging pilot program for parents focused on promoting literacy skills among first through fourth graders. We find positive effects on reading comprehension among third and fourth graders, with effect sizes of .21 to .29 standard deviations, but no effects for first and second graders. Texts also increased attendance at parent-teacher conferences but not at other school-related activities. Evidence to inform future efforts to reverse summer learning loss is provided by parents’ responses to a follow-up survey.
AltonjiJoseph G.MansfieldRichard K.2011. The role of family, school, and community characteristics in inequality in education and labor market outcomes. In Whither opportunity: Rising inequality and the uncertain life chances of low-income children, eds. DuncanGregMurnaneRichard339–58. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
AndersonKellie J.MinkeKathleen M.2007. Parent involvement in education: Toward an understanding of parents’ decision making. Journal of Educational Research100 (5): 311–23.
6.
AtteberryAllisonAndrewMcEachin. 2016. School’s out: Summer learning loss across grade levels and school contexts in the U.S. today. In The summer slide: What we know and can do about summer learning loss, eds. AlexanderK.PitcockS.BoulayM., 35–54. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
7.
BarnardWendy Miedel. 2004. Parent involvement in elementary school and educational attainment. Children and Youth Services Review26 (1): 39–62.
8.
BergmanPeter. 2015. Parent-child information frictions and human capital investment: Evidence from a field experiment. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 5391. Available from http://www.columbia.edu/~psb2101/BergmanSubmission.pdf.
9.
BergmanPeterChanEric W.2017. Leveraging technology to engage parents at scale: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6493. Available from http://www.columbia.edu/~psb2101/ParentRCT.pdf.
10.
BergmanPeterRogersTodd. 2017. Is this technology useless? How seemingly irrelevant factors affect adoption and efficacy. Teachers College Columbia University Working Paper, New York, NY.
11.
BormanGeoffrey D.DowlingN. Maritza. 2006. Longitudinal achievement effects of multiyear summer school: Evidence from the Teach Baltimore randomized field trial. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis28 (1): 25–48.
12.
BormanGeoffrey D.GoetzMichael E.DowlingN. Maritza. 2009. Halting the summer achievement slide: A randomized field trial of the KindergARTen Summer Camp. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk14 (2): 133–47.
13.
BurkamDavid T.ReadyDouglas D.LeeValerie E.LoGerfoLaura F.2004. Social-class differences in summer learning between kindergarten and first grade: Model specification and estimation. Sociology of Education77 (1): 1–31.
14.
CastlemanBenjamin L.2015. The 160-character solution: How text messaging and other behavioral strategies can improve education. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.
15.
ChaplinDuncanCapizzanoJeffrey. 2006. Impacts of a summer learning program: A random assignment study of Building Educated Leaders for Life (BELL). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
16.
CheungCecilia Sin-SzePomerantzEva M.2012. Why does parents’ involvement enhance children’s achievement? The role of parent-oriented motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology104 (3): 820–32.
17.
ColemanJames Samuel, and the U.S. Department of Health. 1966. Equality of educational opportunity. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
18.
CooperHarrisCharltonKellyValentineJeff C.MuhlenbruckLauraBormanGeoffrey D.2000. Making the most of summer school: A meta-analytic and narrative review. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development65 (1): 1–127.
19.
CooperH.NyeB.CharltonK.LindsayJ.GreathouseS.1996. The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research66 (3): 227–68.
20.
DemingDavid. 2009. Early childhood intervention and life-cycle skill development: Evidence from Head Start. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics1 (3): 111–34.
21.
DiPreteThomas A.EirichGregory M.2006. Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology32:271–97.
DowneyDouglas B.von HippelPaul T.BrohBeckett A.2004. Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. American Sociological Review69 (5): 613–35.
24.
DowneyDouglas B.von HippelPaul T.HughesMelanie. 2008. Are “failing” schools really failing? Using seasonal comparison to evaluate school effectiveness. Sociology of Education81 (3): 242–70.
25.
FanXitaoChenMichael. 2001. Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review13 (1): 1–22.
26.
FryerRoland G.Jr.2014. Injecting charter school best practices into traditional public schools: Evidence from field experiments. Quarterly Journal of Economics129 (3): 1355–1407.
27.
FryerRoland G.Jr.LevittSteven D.2004. Understanding the black-white test score gap in the first two years of school. Review of Economics and Statistics86 (2): 447–64.
28.
GoldhaberDan D.BrewerDominic J. 1997. Why don’t schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. Journal of Human Resources32 (3): 505–23.
29.
GoldhaberDan D.BrewerDominic J.AndersonDeborah J.1999. A three-way error components analysis of educational productivity. Education Economics7 (3): 199–208.
30.
HendersonAnne T.1987. The evidence continues to grow: Parent involvement improves student achievement. an annotated bibliography. National Committee for Citizens in Education Special Report. Columbia, MD: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
31.
HoutenvilleAndrew J.ConwayKaren Smith. 2008. Parental effort, school resources, and student achievement. Journal of Human Resources43 (2): 437–53.
32.
Hoover-DempseyKathleen V.WalkerJoan M. T.SandlerHoward M.WhetselDarleneGreenChrista L.WilkinsAndrew S.ClossonKristen. 2005. Why do parents become involved? Research findings and implications. Elementary School Journal106 (2): 105–30.
33.
HurwitzLisa B.LauricellaAlexis R.HansonAnnRadenAnthonyWartellaEllen. 2015. Supporting Head Start parents: Impact of a text message intervention on parent–child activity engagement. Early Child Development and Care185 (9): 1373–89.
34.
JacksonC. KiraboJohnsonRucker C.PersicoClaudia. 2016. The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. Quarterly Journal of Economics131 (1): 157–218.
35.
JacobBrian A.LefgrenLars. 2004. Remedial education and student achievement: A regression-discontinuity analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics86 (1): 226–44.
36.
KimJames S.2006. Effects of a voluntary summer reading intervention on reading achievement: Results from a randomized field trial. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis28 (4): 335–55.
37.
KimJames S.2007. The effects of a voluntary summer reading intervention on reading activities and reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology99 (3): 505–15.
38.
KimJames S.GuryanJonathan. 2010. The efficacy of a voluntary summer book reading intervention for low-income Latino children from language minority families. Journal of Educational Psychology102 (1): 20–31.
39.
KimJames S.WhiteThomas G. 2008. Scaffolding voluntary summer reading for children in grades 3 to 5: An experimental study. Scientific Studies of Reading12 (1): 1–23.
40.
KonstantopoulosSpyrosBormanGeoffrey. 2011. Family background and school effects on student achievement: A multilevel analysis of the Coleman data. Teachers College Record113 (1): 97–132.
41.
KraftMatthew A.DoughertyShaun M.2013. The effect of teacher–family communication on student engagement: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness6 (3): 199–222.
42.
KraftMatthew A.RogersTodd. 2015. The underutilized potential of teacher-to-parent communication: Evidence from a field experiment. Economics of Education Review47:49–63.
43.
LafortuneJulienRothsteinJesseSchanzenbachDiane Whitmore. 2016. School finance reform and the distribution of student achievement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. w2201, Cambridge, MA.
44.
MappKaren L.KuttnerP. J.2013. Partners in education: A dual capacity-building framework for family–school partnerships. Austin, TX: SEDL and U.S. Department of Education.
45.
MatsudairaJordan D.2008. Mandatory summer school and student achievementJournal of Econometrics142 (2): 829–50.
46.
McKenzieDavid. 2012. Beyond baseline and follow-up: The case for more T in experiments. Journal of Development Economics99 (2): 210–21.
47.
NyeBarbaraKonstantopoulosSpyrosHedgesLarry V. 2004. How large are teacher effects?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis26 (3): 237–57.
48.
QuinnDavid M.2015. Kindergarten black–white test score gaps: Re-examining the roles of socioeconomic status and school quality with new data. Sociology of Education88 (2): 120–39.
49.
QuinnDavid M.CoocNorthMcIntyreJoeGomezCelia J.2016. Seasonal dynamics of academic achievement inequality by socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity: Updating and extending past research with new national data. Educational Researcher45 (8): 443–53.
50.
SchacterJohnJoBooil. 2005. Learning when school is not in session: A reading summer day-camp intervention to improve the achievement of exiting first-grade students who are economically disadvantaged. Journal of Research in Reading28 (2): 158–69.
51.
SénéchalMoniqueYoungLaura. 2008. The effect of family literacy interventions on children’s acquisition of reading from kindergarten to grade 3: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research78 (4): 880–907.
52.
StanovichKeith E.1986. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly21 (4): 360–407.
53.
SteffesTracy L.2012. School, society, and state: A new education to govern modern America, 1890–1940. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54.
ThalerRichard H.SunsteinCass R.2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
55.
ToddPetra E.WolpinKenneth I.2007. The production of cognitive achievement in children: Home, school, and racial test score gaps. Journal of Human Capital1 (1): 91–136.
56.
WhiteThomas G.KimJames S.KingstonHelen ChenFosterLisa. 2014. Replicating the effects of a teacher-scaffolded voluntary summer reading program: The role of poverty. Reading Research Quarterly49 (1): 5–30.
57.
YeagerDavid S.WaltonGregory M.2011. Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research81 (2): 267–301.
58.
YorkBenjamin N.LoebSusanna. 2014. One step at a time: The effects of an early literacy text messaging program for parents of preschoolers. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, Cambridge, MA.
