Poverty has a strong relationship to geography in the United States. Previous research has found that rural areas have higher average poverty rates than urban areas, but the new supplemental poverty measure (SPM) has shown in recent years that urban areas have higher average poverty. In this article, we analyze poverty trends from 1967 to 2014 in rural and urban America, using the improved SPM metrics. We find a dramatic decline in poverty in rural areas, and also show that the geographic adjustment of the poverty threshold in the SPM (which lowers poverty thresholds in less expensive areas and raises them in more expensive areas) is an important explanatory factor. We also find that changes in the demographic and economic characteristics of rural and urban residents help to explain the decline. Last, we investigate whether migration of the poor between rural and urban areas helps to account for differential poverty trends, but we find little evidence in support of that hypothesis.
AlbrechtDon E.AlbrechtStan L.2000. Poverty in nonmetropolitan America: Impacts of industrial, employment, and family structure variables. Rural Sociology65 (1): 87–103.
3.
ArtzGeorgeanne M.OrazemPeter F.2006. Reexamining rural decline: How changing rural classifications affect perceived growth. Review of Regional Studies35 (2): 161–91.
4.
CastleEmery N.WuJunjieWeberBruce A.2011. Place orientation and rural-urban interdependence. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy33 (2): 179–204.
5.
CitroConstance F.MichaelRobert T., eds. 1995. Measuring poverty: A new approach. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
FoulkesMattSchafftKai A.2010. The impact of migration on poverty concentrations in the United States, 1995–2000. Rural Sociology75:90–110.
8.
FoxLianaWimerChrisGarfinkelIrwinKaushalNeerajWaldfogelJane. 2015. Waging war on poverty: Poverty trends using a historical supplemental poverty measure. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management34 (3): 567–92.
9.
GlaeserEdward L.KahnMatthew E.RappaportJordan. 2008. Why do the poor live in cities? The role of public transportation. Journal of Urban Economics63 (1): 1–24.
10.
GurleyLauren. 2016. Who’s afraid of rural poverty? The story behind America’s invisible poor. Economics and Sociology75 (3): 589–604.
11.
HirschBarry. 2011. Adjusting poverty thresholds when area prices differ: Labor market evidence. Report submitted to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
12.
IssermanAndrew M.2001. Competitive advantages of rural America in the next century. International Regional Science Review42 (1): 38–58.
13.
JolliffeDean. 2006. Poverty, prices, and place: How sensitive is the spatial distribution of poverty to cost of living adjustments?Economic Inquiry44 (2): 296–310.
14.
LichterDaniel T.BrownDavid L.2011. Rural America in an urban society: Changing spatial and social boundaries. Annual Review of Sociology37:565–92.
15.
LichterDaniel T.JensenLeif. 2000. Rural poverty and welfare before and after PRWORA. Paper presented at Rural Dimensions of Welfare Reform: A Research Conference on Poverty, Welfare, and Food Assistance, May, Washington, DC.
16.
LobaoLinda. 2004. Continuity and change in place stratification: Spatial inequality and middle-range territorial units. Rural Sociology69 (1): 1–30.
17.
MasseyDougDentonNancy. 1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
RobackJennifer. 1982. Wages, rents, and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy90 (6): 1257–78.
20.
RosenthalStuart. 2011. Comments on the U.S. Census Bureau and Interagency Technical Working Group supplemental poverty measure. Report submitted to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
21.
Rural Sociological Society Task Force on Persistent Rural Poverty. 1993. Persistent poverty in rural America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
22.
SchaefferPeterLoveridgeScottWeilerStephen. 2014. Urban and rural: Opposites no more!Economic Development Quarterly28 (1): 3–4.
23.
ShortKathleen. 2012. The research supplemental poverty measure: 2011. Current Population Reports P60-244. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
24.
ShortKathleen. 2015. The supplemental poverty measure: 2014. Current Population Reports P60-254. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
25.
SnyderAnastasia R.McLaughlinDiane K.2004. Female-headed families and poverty in rural America. Rural Sociology69 (1): 127–49.
26.
SwanstromToddDreierPeterMollenkopfJohn. 2002. Economic inequality and public policy: The power of place. City & Community1 (4): 349–72.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1987. The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
31.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1996. When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
32.
WimerChrisFoxLianaGarfinkelIrwinKaushalNeerajWaldfogelJane. 2016. Progress on poverty? New estimates of historical trends using an anchored supplemental poverty measure. Demography53 (4): 1207–18.
ZimmermanJulie N.HamSunnyFrankSarah Michelle. 2008. Does it or doesn’t it? Geographic differences in the costs of living. Rural Sociology73 (3): 463–86.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
