This article documents the diversity of political attitudes and voting patterns along the urban-rural continuum of the United States. We find that America’s rural and urban interface, in terms of political attitudes and voting patterns, is just beyond the outer edges of large urban areas and through the suburban counties of smaller metropolitan areas. Both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton performed well in densely populated areas on the urban side of the interface, but they faced increasingly difficult political climates and sharply diminished voter support on the rural side of the interface. The reduction in support for Clinton in 2016 in rural areas was particularly pronounced. Even after controlling for demographic, social, and economic factors (including geographic region, education, income, age, race, and religious affiliation) in a spatial regression, we find that a county’s position in the urban-rural continuum remained statistically significant in the estimation of voting patterns in presidential elections.
AbrajanoMarisaBurnettCraig M.2012. Polls and elections: Do blacks and whites see Obama through race-tinted glasses? A comparison of Obama’s and Clinton’s approval ratings. Presidential Studies Quarterly42 (2): 363–75.
2.
AbramsSamuel J.FiorinaMorris P.2012. “The big sort” that wasn’t: A skeptical reexamination. PS: Political Science & Politics45 (2): 203–10.
3.
AnselinLuc. 2002. Under the hood: Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics27:247–67.
4.
AnselinLuc. 2005. Exploring spatial data with GeoDa. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Spatial Analysis Lab, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois.
BartelsLarry M.2006. What’s the matter withWhat’s the matter with Kansas? Quarterly Journal of Political Science1 (2): 201–26.
7.
BishopBillCushingRobert. 2008. The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
BlackMerle. 2004. The transformation of the Southern Democratic Party. Journal of Politics66 (4): 1001–17.
9.
ButtelFrederickFlinnWilliam. 1975. Sources and consequences of agrarian values in American society. Rural Sociology40 (2): 134–51.
10.
CampbellDavid E.GreenJohn C.LaymanGeoffrey C.2011. The party faithful: Partisan images, candidate religion, and the electoral impact of party identification. American Journal of Political Science55 (1): 42–58.
11.
ChoWendy K. T.GimpelJames G.DyckJoshua J.2006. Residential concentration, political socialization, and voter turnout. Journal of Politics68 (1): 156–67.
12.
CramerKatherine J.2016. The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
DruryRenéeTweetenLuther. 1997. Have farmers lost their uniqueness?Review of Agricultural Economics19 (1): 58–90.
14.
FinkeRogerScheitleChristopher P.2005. Accounting for the uncounted: Computing correctives for the 2000 RCMS data. Review of Religious Research47 (1): 5–22.
15.
FranciaPeter L.BaumgartnerJody. 2005. Victim or victor of the “culture war”? How cultural issues affect support for George W. Bush in rural America. American Review of Politics26:349–67.
16.
FrankThomas. 2004. What’s the matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of America. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
17.
FrendreisJohnTatalovichRaymond. 2013. Secularization, modernization, or population change: Explaining the decline of Prohibition in the United States. Social Science Quarterly94 (2): 379–94.
18.
GimpelJames G.DyckJoshuaShawDaron. 2004. Registrants, voters, and turnout variability across neighborhoods. Political Behavior26 (4): 343–75.
19.
GimpelJames G.KarnesKimberly A.2006. The rural side of the urban-rural gap. PS: Political Science & Politics39 (3): 467–72.
20.
GimpelJames G.SchuknechtJason E.2001. Interstate migration and electoral politics. Journal of Politics63 (1): 207–31.
21.
GlennNorval D.HillLester. 1977. Rural-urban differences in attitudes and behavior in the United States. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science429:36–50.
22.
GrammichCliffordHadawayKirkHousealRichardJonesDale E.KrindatchAlexeiStanleyRichieTaylorRichard H.2012. 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious congregations & membership study. Lenexa, KS: Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies.
23.
HayesDannyMcKeeSeth C.2008. Toward a one-party South?American Politics Research36 (1): 3–32.
24.
HuiIris. 2013. Who is your preferred neighbor? Partisan residential preferences and neighborhood satisfaction. American Politics Research41 (6): 997–1021.
25.
JohnsonKenneth M.2012. Rural demographic change in the new century: Slower growth, increased diversity. Issue Brief No. 44. Durham, NH: Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire.
26.
JohnsonKenneth M.20February2017. Where is “rural America” and what does it look like?The Conversation. Available from https://theconversation.com.
27.
JohnsonKenneth M.VossPaul R.HammerRoger B.FuguittGlenn V.McNivenScott. 2005. Temporal and spatial variation in age-specific net migration in the United States. Demography42 (4): 791–812.
28.
JohnsonKenneth M.WinklerRichelle L.RogersLuke T.2013. Age and lifecycle patterns driving U.S. migration shifts. Carsey Institute Issue Brief 62. Durham, NH: Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire.
29.
KnokeDavidHenryConstance. 1977. Political structure of rural America. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science429:51–62.
30.
KronJosh.30November2012. Red state, blue city: How the urban-rural divide is splitting America. The Atlantic. Available from www.theatlantic.com (accessed 8December2016).
31.
LeipDave. 2016. Atlas of U.S. presidential elections. Available from uselectionatlas.org.
32.
Lewis-BeckM.1977. Agrarian political behavior in the United States. American Journal of Political Science21 (3): 543–65.
33.
McDanielEric L.EllisonChristopher G.2008. God’s party? Race, religion, and partisanship over time. Political Research Quarterly61 (2): 180–91.
34.
McDonaldIan. 2011. Migration and sorting in the American electorate: Evidence from the 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study. American Politics Research39 (3): 512–33.
35.
McKeeSeth C.2008. Rural voters and the polarization of American presidential elections. PS: Political Science & Politics41 (1): 101–8.
36.
McKeeSeth C.TeigenJeremy M.2009. Probing the reds and blues: Sectionalism and voter location in the 2000 and 2004 U. S. presidential elections. Political Geography28 (8): 484–95.
37.
McVeighRoryDiazMaria-Elena D.2009. Voting to ban same-sex marriage: Interests, values, and communities. American Sociological Review74:891–915.
38.
MonsonRenée A.MertensJo Beth. 2011. All in the family: Red states, blue states, and postmodern family patterns, 2000 and 2004. Sociological Quarterly52 (2): 244–67.
39.
MorrillRichardKnoppLarryBrownMichael. 2007. Anomalies in red and blue: Exceptionalism in American electoral geography. Political Geography26 (5): 525–53.
40.
Office of Management and Budget. 2015. Revised delineations of metropolitan statistical areas, micropolitan statistical areas and combined statistical areas and guidance on uses of the delineation of these areas. OMB Bulletin 15-01. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
41.
Pew Research Center. 2014. Political polarization in the American public: How increasing ideological uniformity and partisan antipathy affect politics, compromise and everyday life. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available from pewresearch.org.
42.
RobinsonTonyNoriegaStephen. 2010. Voter migration as a source of electoral change in the Rocky Mountain West. Political Geography29 (1): 28–39.
43.
ScalaDante. 2011. Changes in New Hampshire’s Republican Party: Evolving footprint in presidential politics, 1960–2008. New England Issue Brief 30. Durham, NH: Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire.
44.
ScalaDanteJohnsonKenneth M.RogersLuke T.2015. Red rural, blue rural? Presidential voting patterns in a changing rural America. Political Geography48:108–18.
45.
SullivanJas M.JohnsonMelanie S.2008. Race is on my mind: Explaining black voters’ political attraction to Barack Obama. Race, Gender & Class15 (3–4): 51–64.
46.
TysonAlecManiam.Shiva2016. Behind Trump’s victory: Divisions by race, gender, education. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available from www.pewresearch.org (accessed 6December2016).
