Schools often mirror the communities in which they are located. Research on rural-urban school inequality tends to focus on the contrast among urban, suburban, and rural schools, glossing over the variation and similarities within these areas. We provide a richer description of the spatial distribution of educational inequality by examining school composition, achievement, and resources in all U.S. public elementary schools in 2010–2011. We take the traditional census categories derived from residential and commuting patterns, and apply them to schools across the country in analyses that reveal gradual transitions and blurry boundaries among the traditional zones. The results show high levels of variation within the suburbs and substantial commonality between rural and urban areas and suggest that census-defined metropolitan areas are not ideal when considering the geography of educational opportunity.
AllardScott W.2008. Out of reach: Place, poverty, and the new American welfare state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
BardJoeGardenerClarkWielandRegi. 2006. Rural school consolidation: history, research summary, conclusions, and recommendations. Rural Educator27 (2): 40–48.
3.
BischoffKendraReardonSean F.2014. Residential segregation by income, 1970–2009. In Diversity and disparities: America enters a new century, ed. LoganJohn, 208–34. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
4.
Burdick-WillJuliaKeelsMicereSchubleTodd. 2013. Closing and opening schools: The association between neighborhood characteristics and the location of new educational opportunities in a large urban district. Journal of Urban Affairs35 (1): 59–80.
5.
CarrPatrick J.KefalasMaria J.2009. Hollowing out the middle: The rural brain drain and what it means for America. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
6.
DownesThomas A.ZabelJeffrey E.2002. The impact of school characteristics on house prices: Chicago 1987–1991. Journal of Urban Economics52 (1): 1–25.
7.
EDFacts. 2013a. Achievement results for state assessments in mathematics: School year 2010–11. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Available from https://explore.data.gov/Education.
8.
EDFacts. 2013b. Achievement results for state assessments in reading/language arts: School year 2010–11. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Available from https://explore.data.gov/Education.
9.
EhrenhaltAlan. 2012. The great inversion and the future of the American city. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
10.
FanXitaoChenMichael J.1999. Academic achievement of rural school students: A multi-year comparison with their peers in suburban and urban schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education15 (1): 31–46.
11.
GarcíaAngela S.SchmalzbauerLeah. 2017. Placing assimilation theory: Mexican immigrants in urban and rural America. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
12.
GradySarahBielickStacey. 2010. Trends in the use of school choice, 1993 to 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
13.
HinerColleen C.2016. Beyond the edge and in between: (Re)conceptualizing the rural-urban interface as meaning-model-metaphor. The Professional Geographer68 (4): 520–32.
14.
KneeboneElizabethGarrEmily. 2010. The suburbanization of poverty. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
15.
KneeboneElizabethGoyetteKimberly, eds. 2014. Choosing homes, choosing schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
16.
LichterDaniel T.BrownDavid L.2011. Rural America in an urban society: Changing spatial and social boundaries. Annual Review of Sociology37:565–92.
17.
LipmanPauline. 2011. The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
18.
LoganJohnBurdick-WillJulia. 2016. School segregation, charter schools, and access to quality education. Journal of Urban Affairs38 (3): 323–43.
19.
LoganJohn R.MincaElisabetaAdarSinem. 2012. The geography of inequality: Why separate means unequal in American public schools. Sociology of Education85 (3): 287–301.
20.
MorganStephen L.JungSol Be. 2016. Still no effect of resources? Even in the new gilded age?Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2 (5): 83–116.
21.
MurphyAlexandra K.2007. The suburban ghetto: The legacy of Herbert Gans in understanding the experience of poverty in recently impoverished American suburbs. City & Community6 (1): 21–37.
22.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2012a. Local education agency (school district) finance survey 2010–11. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Available from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/f33agency.asp.
23.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2012b. Public elementary/secondary school universe survey data 2010–11. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Available from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp.
24.
OrfieldGaryLeeChungmei. 2005. Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
ReardonSean F.OwensAnn. 2014. 60 years after Brown: Trends and consequences of school segregation. Annual Review of Sociology40:199–218.
27.
TaylorL.2011. No boundaries: Exurbia and the study of contemporary urban dispersion. GeoJournal76:323–39.
28.
WilkinsAmy C.2014. Race, age, and identity transformations in the transition from high school to college for black and first-generation white men. Sociology of Education87 (3): 171–87.
