In this article, we compare the two main types of student loans used to finance postsecondary education: mortgage-type loans, which are repaid over a set period of time and mainly used in the United States; and income-contingent loans, which are repaid depending on students’ future income and used in Australia and England. We argue that the major concern with mortgage-type loans is the repayment burden that falls on students. Repayment burden—the proportion of a debtor’s income required to repay loans—is fundamental to the assessment of student loan systems because it affects the probability of students defaulting on loan repayment, and because it bears on debtors’ consumption and standard of living. We show that Stafford loans imply extremely difficult financial circumstances for a minority of U.S. loan recipients, and that income-contingent loans can solve those problems. The financial benefits of income-contingent loans are illustrated through a hypothetical student loan experience.
BarrNicholasChapmanBruceDeardenLorraineDynarskiSusan. 2017. Getting student financing right in the USA: Lessons from Australia and England. Centre for Global Higher Education, Working Paper No. 16, University College London. Available from http://www.researchcghe.org/perch/resources/publications/wp16.pdf.
2.
BaumSandyJohnsonMartha C.2016. Strengthening federal student aid: Reforming the student loan repayment system. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
3.
BaumSandySchwartzSaul. 2006. How much debt is too much? Defining benchmarks for manageable student debt. Washington, DC: The Project on Student Debt and The College Board.
4.
ChapmanBruce. 2006. Government managing risk: Income contingent loans for social and economic progress. London: Routledge.
5.
ChapmanBruceHigginsTimothyStiglitzJoseph E., eds. 2014. Income contingent loans: Theory, practice and prospects. London: Palgrave McMillan.
6.
ChapmanBruceLiuAmy Y. C.2013. Repayment burdens of student loans for Vietnamese higher education. Economics of Education Review37 (5): 298–308.
7.
ChapmanBruceLounkaewKiatanantha. 2015. An analysis of Stafford loans repayment burdens. Economics of Education Review45 (3): 89–102.
8.
ChapmanBruceLounkaewKiatanantha. 2016. Are ICLs necessary: The benefits and costs of government guaranteed bank loans? Paper presented to the International Economics of Education Conference, Badaloz, Spain, June.
9.
ChapmanBruceLounkaewKiatananthaPolsiriPirunaSarachittiRangsitSitthipongpanichThitima. 2010. Thailand’s student loans fund: Interest rate subsidies and repayment burdens. Economics of Education Review29 (5): 685–94.
10.
ChapmanBruceSinningMathias. 2012. Student loan reforms for German higher education: Financing tuition fees. Education Economics22 (6): 569–88.
11.
ChapmanBruceSuryadarmaDaniel. 2013. Financing higher education: The viability of a commercial student loan scheme in Indonesia. In Education in Indonesia, eds. SurydarmaDanielJonesGavin W., 203–15. Singapore: Institute of South East Asian Studies.
12.
DynarskiMark. 1994. Who defaults on student loans? Findings from the national postsecondary student aid study. Economics of Education Review13:55–68.
FriedmanMilton. 1955. The role of government in education. In Economics and the public interest, ed. SoloRobert A., 123–44. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
17.
GrossJacob P. K.CekicOsmanHosslerDonHillmanNick. 2009. What matters in student loan default: A review of the research literature. Journal of Student Financial Aid39:19–29.
HillmanNicholas W.2014. College on credit: A multilevel analysis of student loan default. Review of Higher Education37 (2): 169–95.
20.
LochnerLanceMonge-NaranjoAlexander. 2015. Student loans and repayment: Theory, evidence and policy. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 20849, Cambridge, MA.
21.
LooneyAdamYannelis.Constantine2015. A crisis in student loans? How changes in the characteristics of borrowers and in the institutions they attended contributed to rising loan defaults. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Fall, Washington, DC.
22.
PalaciosM.2004. Investing in human capital: A capital markets approach to student funding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
SalmiJamil. 2003. Student loans in an international perspective: The World Bank experience. The World Bank LCHSD Paper Series 44, Washington, DC.
24.
SchwartzSaulFinnieRoss. 2002. Student loans in Canada: An analysis of borrowing and repayment. Economics of Education Review21:497–512.
25.
StiglitzJoseph E.2014. Remarks on income contingent loans: How effective can they be at mitigating risk? In Income contingent loans: Theory, practice and prospects, eds. ChapmanBruceHigginsTimothyStiglitzJoseph E., 31–38. London: Palgrave McMillan.
26.
VossensteynHans. 2002. Shared interests, shared costs: Student contributions in Dutch higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management79 (3): 145–54.
27.
WoodhallMaureen. 1987. Establishing student loans in developing countries: Some guidelines. The World Bank Education and Training Discussion Paper EDT85, Washington, DC.
28.
ZidermanAdrianAlbrecht.Douglas1995. Financing universities in developing countries. The Stanford Series on Education and Public Policy, no. 16, Washington, DC.
