This article analyzes the empowerment and disempowerment of credit rating agencies (CRAs) as private regulatory intermediaries. Until the recent financial crisis, regulators heavily relied on private credit ratings to impose risk-sensitive requirements on financial market actors (targets). Regulatory use of credit ratings was instrumental in empowering CRAs because regulatory authority was delegated to them and their own private power was bolstered by public endorsement. But regulators’ subsequent efforts to disempower the CRAs—more recently regarded as dysfunctional “runaway” intermediaries—have proven costly, complicated to do, and hardly consequential in limiting CRAs’ de facto power. This dynamic reveals a path-dependent power shift in favor of private intermediaries that is more pronounced (1) the larger the intermediary’s own sources of power when an RIT arrangement is established, (2) the larger the transfer of authority to the intermediary, and (3) the longer regulators rely on the intermediary.
AbbottKennethGenschelPhilippSnidalDuncanZanglBernhard, eds. 2015. International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AbbottKennethLevi-FaurDavidSnidalDuncan. 2017. Theorizing regulatory intermediaries: The RIT model. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
BrunerChristopher J.AbdelalRawi. 2005. To judge Leviathan: Sovereign credit ratings, national law, and the world economy. Journal of Public Policy4 (2): 191–217.
5.
BrunnermeierMarkusCrocketAndrewGoodhartCharlesPersaudAvinash D.ShinHyun. 2009. The fundamental principles of financial regulation. Geneva: International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies.
6.
BütheTim. 2002. Taking temporality seriously: Modeling history and the use of narratives as evidence. American Political Science Review96 (3): 481–93.
7.
CantorRichardPackerFrank. 1994. The credit rating industry. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review19 (2): 1–26.
8.
CutlerAnne C.HauflerVirginiaPorterTony. 1999. Private authority and international affairs. In Private authority and international affairs, eds. CutlerAnne C.HauflerVirginiaPorterTony, 2–38. New York, NY: New York University Press.
9.
DarbellayAline. 2013. Regulating credit rating agencies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
10.
European Commission. 2013. Memo: New rules on credit rating agencies (CRAs) enter into force. Brussels: European Commission.
11.
FarrellHenryNewmanAbraham L.2010. Making global markets: Historical institutionalism in international political economy. Review of International Political Economy17 (4): 609–38.
12.
Federal Reserve Board. 2011. Report to the Congress on credit ratings. Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
13.
GallandJean-Pierre. 2017. Big third-party certifiers and the construction of transnational regulation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
14.
GenschelPhilippZanglBernhard. 2014. State transformations in OECD countries: Towards the state as a manager of political authority. Annual Review of Political Science17:337–54.
15.
GreenJessica F.2014. Rethinking private authority: Agents and entrepreneurs in global environmental governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
HallRodney B.BierstekerThomas J.2002. The emergence of private authority in the international system. In The emergence of private authority in global governance, eds. HallRodney B.BierstekerThomas J., 3–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HavingaTettyVerbruggenPaul. 2017. Understanding complex governance relationships in food safety regulation: The RIT model as a theoretical lens. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
18.
HawkinsDarren G.LakeDavid A.NielsonDaniel L.TierneyMichael J.2006. Delegation under anarchy: States, international organizations, and principal-agent theory. In Delegation and agency in international organizations, eds. HawkinsDarren G.LakeDavid A.NielsonDaniel L.TierneyMichael J., 3–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HillClaire A.2011. Limits of Dodd-Frank’s rating agency reform. Chapman Law Review15 (1): 133–48.
20.
KerwerDieter. 2005. Holding global regulators accountable: the case of credit rating agencies. Governance18 (3): 453–75.
21.
KruckAndreas. 2011. Private ratings, public regulations: credit rating agencies and global financial governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
KruckAndreas. 2016. Resilient blunderers: Credit rating fiascos and rating agencies’ institutionalized status as private authorities. Journal of European Public Policy23 (5): 753–70.
23.
LallRanjit. 2012. From failure to failure: The politics of international banking regulation. Review of International Political Economy19 (4): 609–38.
24.
LocontoAllison Marie. 2017. Models of assurance: Diversity and standardization of modes of intermediation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
25.
LyttonTimothy D.2017. The taming of the stew: Regulatory intermediaries in food safety governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
26.
MahoneyJames. 2000. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society29 (4): 507–48.
27.
MattliWalterBütheTim. 2005. Accountability in accounting? The politics of private rule-making in the public interest. Governance18 (3): 399–429.
28.
MattliWalterSeddonJack. 2015. New organizational leadership: Nonstate actors in global economic governance. Global Policy6 (3): 266–76.
29.
NölkeAndreas. 2004. Transnational private authority and corporate governance. In New rules for global markets: Public and private governance in the world economy, ed. SchirmStefan A., 155–75. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
PagliariStefano. 2012. Who governs finance? The shifting public-private divide in the regulation of derivatives, rating agencies and hedge funds. European Law Journal18 (1): 44–61.
31.
PartnoyFrank. 2009. Overdependence on credit ratings was a primary cause of the crisis. San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 09-015. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1430653.
32.
PfefferJeffreySalancikGerald R.2003. The external control of organizations. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
33.
PiersonPaul. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review94 (2): 251–67.
34.
PorterTony. 2010. Risk models and transnational governance in the global financial crisis: The cases of Basel II and credit rating agencies. In Global finance in crisis: The politics of international regulatory change, eds. HelleinerEricPagliariStefanoZimmermannHubert, 56–73. London: Routledge.
35.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2012. Report to Congress on assigned credit ratings, as required by Section 939F of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Customer Protection Act. Washington, DC: SEC.
SinclairTimothy J.2005. The new masters of capital: American bond rating agencies and the politics of creditworthiness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38.
TallbergJonas. 2002. Delegation to supranational institutions: Why, how, and with what consequences?West European Politics25 (1): 23–46.
39.
Van der HeijdenJeroen. 2017. Brighter and darker sides of intermediation: Target-oriented and self-interested intermediaries in the regulatory governance of buildings. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).
40.
WhiteLawrence J.2010. Markets: the credit rating agencies. Journal of Economic Perspectives24 (2): 211–26.
41.
ZürnMichaelBinderMartinEcker-EhrhardtMatthias. 2012. International authority and its politicization. International Theory4 (1): 69–106.
