This analysis draws on binational data from an ethnosurvey conducted in Guatemala and in the United States in Providence, Rhode Island, to develop a refinement of the weighting scheme that the Mexican Migration Project (MMP) uses. The alternative weighting procedure distinguishes between temporary and settled migrants by using a question on household location in the Guatemala questionnaire that is not used in the MMP. Demographic characteristics and integration experiences of the most recent U.S. trip are used to assess the composition and representativeness of the U.S. sample. Using a composite index of migrant integration to compare the impact of alternative U.S. sample weights on point estimates, I find that although the U.S. sample is broadly representative across a range of background characteristics, the MMP sample weighting procedure biases estimates of migrant integration downward.
BarryDeclan T.2001. Development of a new scale for measuring acculturation: The East Asian acculturation measure (EAAM). Journal of Immigrant Health3 (4): 193–97.
2.
BarryDeclan T.2005. Measuring acculturation among male Arab immigrants in the United States: An exploratory study. Journal of Immigrant Health7 (3): 179–84.
3.
BijlRob V.ZorluAslanJennissenRoel P. W.BlomMartine. 2008. The integration of migrants in the Netherlands monitored over time: Trend and cohort analyses. In International migration in Europe: New trends and new methods of analysis, eds. BonifaziCorradoOkolskiMarekSchroolJeannetteSimonPatrick, 199–223. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
4.
DurandJorgeMasseyDouglas S.ZentenoRené. 2001. Mexican immigration to the United States: Continuities and changes. Latin American Research Review36 (1): 107–27.
5.
EntzingerHanBiezeveldRenske. 2003. Benchmarking in immigrant integration. Report for the European Commission. Rotterdam: European Research Centre on Migration and Ethnic Relations, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
6.
EscobarAgustínRobertsBryan. 1998. Surveys as instruments of modernization. American Behavioral Scientist42 (2): 237–51.
7.
GroenewoldGeorgeBilsborrowRichard. 2008. Design of samples for international migration surveys: Methodological considerations and lessons learned from a multi-country study in Africa and Europe. In International migration in Europe: New trends and new methods of analysis, eds. BonifaziCorradoOkolskiMarekSchroolJeannetteSimonPatrick, 293–312. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
8.
HillKenneth. 1985. Some methodological issues in analyzing data on immigration. In Immigration statistics: A story of neglect, eds. LevineDonald B.HillKennethWarrenRobert, 203–54. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
9.
HillKennethWongRebeca. 2005. Mexico-U.S. migration: Views from both sides of the border. Population and Development Review31 (1): 1–18.
10.
JackmanSimon. 2008. Measurement. In The Oxford handbook of political methodology, eds. Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.BradyHenry E.CollierDavid, 119–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
KurthenHermannHeislerBarbara S.2009. Immigrant integration: Comparative evidence from the United States and Germany. Ethnic and Racial Studies32 (1): 139–70.
12.
MasseyDouglas S.1985. The settlement process among Mexican migrants to the United States: New methods and findings. In Immigration statistics: A story of neglect, eds. LevineDonald B.HillKennethWarrenRobert, 255–92. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
MasseyDouglas S.ZentenoRené. 1999. A validation of the ethnosurvey: The case of Mexico-U.S. migration. International Migration Review34 (3): 766–93.
15.
McKenzieDavid J.MistiaenJohan. 2009. Surveying migrant households: A comparison of census-based, snowball and intercept point surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A172 (Part 2): 339–60.
16.
RalluJean Louis. 2008. One-way or both-ways migration surveys. In International migration in Europe: New trends and new methods of analysis, eds. BonifaziCorradoOkolskiMarekSchroolJeannetteSimonPatrick, 273–92. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
17.
RendallMichael S.BrownellPeterKupsSarah. 2011. Declining return migration from the United States to Mexico in the late-2000s recession: A research note. Demography48 (3): 1049–58.
18.
RhineSherrie L. W.GreeneWilliam H.2006. The determinants of being unbanked for U.S. immigrants. Journal of Consumer Affairs40 (1): 21–40.
19.
SudmanSeymourKaltonGraham. 1986. New developments in the sampling of special populations. Annual Review of Sociology12:401–29.
