Previous studies show that immigrants to the United States married to natives earn higher wages than immigrants married to other immigrants. Using data from the 1980 to 2000 U.S. censuses and the 2005 to 2010 American Community Surveys, we show that these wage premiums have increased over time. Our evidence suggests that the trends are unlikely to be explained by changes in the attributes of immigrants who tend to marry natives but might instead be a result of changes in how these attributes are rewarded in the labor market. Because immigrants married to natives tend to have more schooling, part of the increasing premium can be explained by increases in the value of a college education. We find, however, that even when allowing the value of education and English-speaking ability to vary, intermarriage wage premiums have increased over time. We believe these patterns might be driven by changes in technology and globalization, which have made communication and management skills more highly rewarded in the U.S. labor market.
AcemoğluDaronAutorDavid H.2011. Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In Handbook of labor economics, vol. 4, eds. AshenfelterO.CardDavid, 1043–1171. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2.
AlbaRichardNeeVictor. 2003. Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
AutorDavid H.DornDavid. 2013. The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review103 (5): 1553–97.
4.
AutorDavid H.HandelMichael J.2013. Putting tasks to the test: Human capital, job tasks, and wages. Journal of Labor Economics31 (S1): S59–96.
5.
AutorDavid H.LevyFrankMurnaneRichard J.2003. The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics118 (4): 1279–1333.
6.
BeanFrank D.StevensG.2003. America’s newcomers and the dynamics of diversity. American Sociological Association Rose Series in Sociology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
BorjasGeorge J.2000. Ethnic enclaves and assimilation. Swedish Economic Policy Review7 (2): 89–122.
8.
BorjasGeorge J.Forthcoming. The slowdown in the economic assimilation of immigrants: Aging and cohort effects revisited again. Journal of Human Capital.
9.
BoudarbatBrahimLemieuxThomasRiddellW. Craig. 2010. The evolution of the returns to human capital in Canada, 1980–2005. Canadian Public Policy36 (1): 63–89.
10.
ChiMiaoDrewiankaScott. 2014. How much is a green card worth? Evidence from Mexican men who marry women born in the U.S. Labour Economics31:103–16.
11.
ChiswickBarry R.MillerPaul W.2005. Do enclaves matter in immigrant adjustment?City & Community4 (1): 5–35.
12.
DuncanBrianTrejoStephen J.2011. Intermarriage and the intergenerational transmission of ethnic identity and human capital for Mexican Americans. Journal of Labor Economics29 (2): 195–227.
13.
DribeMartinNystedtPaul. 2014. Is there an intermarriage premium for male immigrants? Exogamy and earnings in Sweden 1990–2009. International Migration Review49:3–35. doi:10.1111/imre.12081
14.
EdinPer-AndersFredrikssonPeterÅslundOlof. 2003. Ethnic enclaves and the economic success of immigrants: Evidence from a natural experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics118 (1): 329–57.
15.
FurtadoDeliaTheodoropoulosNikolaos. 2009. I’ll marry you if you get me a job: Marital assimilation and immigrant employment rates. International Journal of Manpower30 (1–2): 116–26.
16.
FurtadoDeliaTheodoropoulosNikolaos. 2010. Why does intermarriage increase immigrant employment? The role of networks. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy10 (1): 1–31.
17.
GevrekZahide E.2011. Role of family structure in immigrants’ economic integration. PhD diss., University of Arizona, Tucson.
18.
KalmijnMatthijsvan TubergenFrank. 2010. A comparative perspective on intermarriage: Explaining differences among national-origin groups in the United States. Demography47 (2): 459–79.
19.
KantarevicJ.2005. Interethnic marriages and economic assimilation of immigrants. IZA Institute for the Study of Labor Discussion Paper 1142, Bonn, Germany.
20.
KuhnPeterWeinbergerCatherine. 2005. Leadership skills and wages. Journal of Labor Economics23 (3): 395–436.
21.
LemieuxThomas. 2008. The changing nature of wage inequality. Journal of Population Economics21 (1): 21–48.
22.
LindleyJoanneMachinStephen. 2014. Spatial changes in labour market inequality. Journal of Urban Economics79:121–38.
23.
MasseyDouglas S.DurandJorgeMaloneNolan J.2002. Beyond smoke and mirrors: Mexican immigration in an era of economic integration. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
24.
MengXinGregoryRobert G.2005. Intermarriage and the economic assimilation of immigrants. Journal of Labor Economics23 (1): 135–75.
25.
MengXinMeursDominique. 2009. Intermarriage, language, and economic assimilation process. International Journal of Manpower30 (1–2): 127–44.
26.
NekbyL.2010. Inter- and intra-marriage premiums revisited: It’s probably who you are, not who you marry! IZA Institute for the Study of Labor Discussion Paper 5317, Bonn, Germany.
27.
NottmeyerO.2010. Does intermarriage pay off? A panel data analysis. IZA Institute for the Study of Labor Discussion Paper 5104, Bonn, Germany.
28.
PortesAlejandroZhouMin. 1993. The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science530 (1): 74–96.
29.
RugglesStevenAlexanderJ. TrentGenadekKatieGoekenRonaldSchroederMatthew B.SobekMatthew. 2010. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 5.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
30.
SafiMirnaRogersGodfrey. 2008. Intermarriage and assimilation: Disparities in levels of exogamy among immigrants in France. Population63 (2): 239–67.
31.
WarmanCasey. 2007. Ethnic enclaves and immigrant earnings growth. Canadian Journal of Economics40 (2): 401–22.
32.
WeinbergerCatherine J.2014. The increasing complementarity between cognitive and social skills. Review of Economics and Statistics96 (5): 849–61.
