This study uses a field experiment to study bias against living with Arab American women, a group whose position in the U.S. race system remains uncertain. We developed fictitious female white and Arab American identities and used the audit method to respond to 560 roommate-wanted advertisements in four metro areas: Los Angeles, New York, Detroit, and Houston. To focus on social—rather than purely economic—biases, all responses identified the sender as college-educated and employed and were written in grammatically correct English. We compare the number of replies received, finding that Arab-origin names receive about 40 percent fewer replies. We then model variation in discrimination rates by proximity to mosques, geographic concentration of mosques, and the percentage of Arabs living in a census tract so as to test ethnic competition theory and the contact hypothesis. In Los Angeles and New York, greater discrimination occurred in neighborhoods with the highest concentration of mosques.
AhmedAli M.AnderssonLinaHammarstedtMats. 2010. Can discrimination in the housing market be reduced by increasing the information about the applicants?Land Economics86 (1): 79–90.
2.
AhmedAli M.HammarstedtMats. 2008. Discrimination in the rental housing market: A field experiment on the Internet. Journal of Urban Economics64 (2): 362–72.
3.
AllportGordon. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
4.
AsiMaryamBeaulieuDaniel. 2013. Arab households in the United States: 2006–2010. American Community Survey Briefs. Available from www.census.gov.
5.
BarlowFiona KatePaoliniStefaniaPedersenAnneHornseyMatthew J.RadkeHelena R. M.HardwoodJakeRubinMarkSibleyChris G.2012. The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin38 (12): 1629–43.
6.
BayoumiMoustafa. 2009. How does it feel to be a problem? Being young and Arab in America. New York, NY: Penguin.
7.
BernhardStefan. 2013. GEOCODE3: Stata module to retrieve coordinates or addresses from Google geocoding API version 3. Statistical Software Components S457650. Boston, MA: Boston College Department of Economics, revised 25July2013.
8.
BertrandMarianneMullainathanSendhil. 2004. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review94 (4): 991–1013.
9.
BogardusEmory S. 1925. Social distance and its origins. Journal of Applied Sociology9:216–26.
10.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 2006. Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
11.
BrownMatthew. 28August2013. North Carolina becomes 7th state to ban Muslim Sharia law. Deseret News. Available from deseretnews.com.
CarlssonMagnusErikssonStefan. 2014. Discrimination in the rental market for apartments. Journal of Housing Economics23:41–54.
14.
CarpusorAdrian G.LogesWilliam E.2006. Rental discrimination and ethnicity in names. Journal of Applied Social Psychology36 (4): 934–52.
15.
CoserLewis. 1956. The functions of social conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
16.
DavillaAlbertoMoraMarie T.2005. Changes in the earnings of Arab men in the U.S. between 2000 and 2002. Journal of Population Economics18:587–601.
17.
GaddisS. Michael. Forthcoming. Discrimination in the credential society: An audit study of race and college selectivity in the labor market. Social Forces.
18.
GaddisS. Michael. 2014. By any other name: Two experiments to examine perceptions of race and social class from names. Working Paper.
19.
GhoshalRaj AndrewGaddisS. Michael. 2014. Finding a roommate on Craigslist: Racial discrimination and residential segregation in urban areas. Working Paper.
20.
GranovetterMark. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78 (6): 1360–80.
21.
GriffinLarry J. 2004. “Generations and collective memory” revisited: Race, region, and memory of civil rights. American Sociological Review69 (4): 544–57.
22.
HerekGregoryCapitanioJohn. 1996. “Some of my best friends”: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin22 (4): 412–24.
23.
HoganBernieBerryBrent. 2011. Racial and ethnic biases in rental housing: An audit study of online apartment listings. City & Community10 (4): 351–72.
24.
JamalAmaneyNaberNadine. 2008. Race and Arab Americans before and after 9/11: From invisible citizens to visible subjects. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
25.
JohnsonAllan G. 2001. Privilege, power, and difference. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
26.
KaushalNeerajKaestnerRobertReimersCordelia. 2007. Labor market effects of September 11th on Arab and Muslim residents of the United States. Journal of Human Resources42:275–308.
27.
KleinmanSherrylCoppMartha. 2009. Denying social harm: Students’ resistance to lessons about inequality. Teaching Sociology37 (3): 283–93.
28.
LowreyAnnie. 28April2013. Wealth gap among races has widened since recession. New York Times.
29.
MasseyDouglas S.DentonNancy A.1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
OlzakSusan. 1992. The dynamics of ethnic competition and conflict. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31.
OmiMichaelWinantHoward. 1994. Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. 2nd ed.New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
PagerDevah. 2003. The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology108 (5): 937–75.
33.
PanagopoulosCostas. 2006. The polls-trends: Arab and Muslim Americans and Islam in the aftermath of 9/11. Public Opinion Quarterly70 (4): 608–24.
34.
PaoliniStefaniaHarwoodJakeRubinMark. 2010. Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin36 (12): 1723–38.
35.
ParrilloVincent N.DonoghueChristopher. 2005. Updating the Bogardus social distance studies: A new national survey. Social Science Journal42 (2): 257–71.
36.
PettigrewThomas F.TroppLinda R.2006. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90 (5): 751–83.
37.
PicardRobert. 2010. GEONEAR: Stata module to find nearest neighbors using geodetic distances. Statistical Software Components S457146. Boston, MA: Boston College Department of Economics, revised 22February2012.
38.
RobnettBelindaFelicianoCynthia. 2011. Patterns of racial-ethnic exclusion by Internet daters. Social Forces89 (3): 807–28.
39.
SachsonMolly. 2010. The big bad Internet: Service provider immunity under Sec. 230 to protect the private individual from unrestrained Internet communication. Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development25:353–78.
40.
SampsonRobert J. 2012. Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
SavelkoulMichaelScheepersPeerTolsmaJochemHagendoornLouk. 2011. Anti-Muslim attitudes in the Netherlands: Tests of contradictory hypotheses derived from ethnic competition theory and intergroup contact theory. European Sociological Review27 (6): 741–58.
42.
SharkeyPatrick. 2013. Stuck in place: Urban neighborhoods and the end of progress toward racial equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
ShiaoJiannbin. 2013. The influence of interracial friendships on the likelihood of interracial intimacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. August 10–13. New York, NY.
44.
SigelmanLeeWelchSusan. 1993. The contact hypothesis revisited: Black-white interaction and positive racial attitudes. Social Forces71 (3): 781–95.
45.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2008. Census report data file A: Top 1000 names. Available from http://www.census.gov.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2013. Housing discrimination against racial and ethnic minorities 2012. Available from www.hud.gov.
48.
WidnerDanielChicoineStephen. 2011. It’s all in the name: Employment discrimination against Arab Americans. Sociological Forum26 (4): 806–23.
49.
WilliamsCarol J.3February2012. Roommate-finder doesn’t facilitate discrimination, court rules. Los Angeles Times.
50.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1987. The truly disadvantaged. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
XuJunLeeJennifer C.2013. The marginalized “model” minority: An empirical examination of the racial triangulation of Asian Americans. Social Forces91 (4): 1363–97.
52.
YingerJohn1995. Closed doors, opportunities lost: The continuing costs of housing discrimination. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
