Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Largely overlooked by researchers studying the science of science communication are the specific journalistic practices and media structures that might enable more constructive public debate in politicized science controversies. In this commentary, we discuss the role that journalists can play as influential knowledge professionals, drawing on insights from the studies in this section of the special issue. In doing so, we outline three complementary approaches to what Thomas Patterson calls “knowledge-based journalism.” By way of these approaches, journalists and their news organizations can contextualize and critically evaluate expert knowledge; facilitate discussion that bridges entrenched ideological divisions; and promote consideration of a broader menu of policy options and technologies. We conclude by discussing the implications for journalism education.

Keywords

science journalism knowledge-based journalism politicization climate change health journalism food biotechnology environmental journalism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Donsbach

Wolfgang

. 2014. Journalism as the new knowledge profession and the consequences for journalism education. Journalism 15 (6): 661–77. doi:10.1177/1464884913491347.

Fahy

Declan

Nisbet

Matthew C.

2011. The science journalist online: Shifting roles and emerging practices. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 12:778–93.

Fowler

Erika F.

Gollust

Sarah E.

2015. The content and effect of politicized health controversies. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).

Johnson

Nathaniel

. 10 July 2013. The GM safety dance: What’s rule and what’s real. Grist.org .

Kahan

Dan M.

Jenkins-Smith

Hank

Tarantola

Tor

Silva

Carol L.

Braman

Donald

. 2015. Geoengineering and climate change polarization: Testing a two-channel model of science communication. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).

Klein

Ezra

. 6 April 2014. How politics makes us stupid. Vox.com .

Klein

Ezra

Bell

Melissa

Yglesias

Matt

. 6 April 2014. Welcome to Vox: A work in progress. Vox.com .

Leonhardt

David

. 22 April 2014. Navigate news with the upshot. New York Times.

Mann

Charles C.

24 April 2013. What if we never run out of oil? The Atlantic.

10.

Mann

Charles C.

25 March 2014. Renewables aren’t enough. Wired.

11.

Meyer

Morgan

. 2010. The rise of the knowledge broker. Science Communication 32:118–27.

12.

Meyer

Philip

. 2002. Precision journalism: A reporter’s introduction to social science methods, 4th ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

13.

Nisbet

Matthew C.

2011. Climate shift: Clear vision for the next decade of public debate. Washington, DC: School of Communication, American University.

14.

Nisbet

Matthew C.

2013. Nature’s prophet: Bill McKibben as journalist, public intellectual, and activist. Joan Shorenstein Center for Press, Politics, and Public Policy. Discussion Paper Series, D-78 March, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA.

15.

Nisbet

Matthew C.

2014. Engaging in science policy controversies: Insights from the U.S. debate over climate change. In The Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology, 2nd ed, eds. Bucchi

Massimiano

Trench

Brian

, 173–85. London: Routledge.

16.

Nisbet

Matthew C.

Brossard

Dominique

Kroepsch

Adrianne

. 2003. Framing science: The stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8:36–70.

17.

Nisbet

Matthew C.

Markowitz

Ezra M.

2015. Expertise in an age of polarization: Evaluating scientists’ political awareness and communication behaviors. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).

18.

Nisbet

Matthew C.

Scheufele

Dietram

. 2012. The polarization paradox: Why hyperpartisanship promotes conservatism and undermines liberalism. Breakthrough Journal 3:55–69.

19.

Nyhan

Brendan

Sides

John

. 2010. How political science can help journalism (and still let journalists be journalists). The Forum 9 (1): Article 2.

20.

Patterson

Thomas E.

2013. Informing the news: The need for knowledge-based journalism. New York, NY: Vintage.

21.

Pielke

Roger

Jr.

2007. The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Plumer

Brad

. 22 April 2014. Two degrees: How the world failed on climate change. Vox.com .

23.

Revkin

Andrew C.

6 November 2012. Why climate disasters might not boost public engagement on climate change. New York Times.

24.

Revkin

Andrew C.

12 May 2014. Consider clashing scientific and societal meanings of “collapse” when reading Antarctic ice news. Dot Earth Blog. New York Times.

25.

Rosen

Jay

. 25 June 2012. Covering wicked problems. PressThink.org .

26.

Rosenstiel

Tom

. 15 April 2013. Why we need a better conversation about the future of journalism education. Poynter.org .

27.

Scheufele

Dietram A.

2013. Communicating science in social settings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Supplement 3): 14040–47.

28.

Silver

Nate

. 17 March 2014. What the fox knows. FiveThirtyEight.com .

29.

Taubes

Gary

. 2007. Good calories, bad calories. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

30.

Washington Post. 4 January 2014. Washington Post to launch new initiative focused on real-world impact of public policy. Washington Post.

31.

Wihbey

John

. 27 September 2011. Research chat: Andrew Revkin on covering and using scholarship. JournalistResource.org .

32.

Yeo

Sara K.

Xenos

Michael A.

Brossard

Dominique

Scheufele

Dietram A.

2015. Selecting our own science: How communication contexts and individual traits shape information seeking. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (this volume).

The Need for Knowledge-Based Journalism in Politicized Science Debates

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References