This article discusses the divergent developmental outcomes among postwar South Korea, Taiwan, and South Vietnam. While U.S. aid has correctly been identified as a key factor in the rapid postwar development of South Korea and Taiwan, the failure of aid to establish strong institutions in South Vietnam calls for a closer analysis of how different historical and geopolitical factors explain the greater political stability and institutional capacity of South Korea and Taiwan. In particular, the legacies of Japanese colonialism are seen as having played a key role in establishing the strong developmental states of South Korea and Taiwan, while the postcolonial South Vietnamese state was more fragile. As such, there was greater political resistance to land reform in the latter, and large amounts of U.S. economic and military aid were unable to quell domestic insurgency and establish the basis for economic development.
AmsdenAlice H.1989. Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
ArrighiGiovanni. 1996. The rise of East Asia: World systemic and regional aspects. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy16 (7/8): 6–43.
3.
BarrettRichard E.1988. Autonomy and diversity in the American state in Taiwan. In Contending approaches to the political economy of Taiwan, eds. WincklerEdwin A.GreenhalghSusan M., 121–37. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
4.
BergerMark T.2004. The battle for Asia: From decolonization to globalization. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
5.
BrownT. Louise. 1991. War and aftermath in Vietnam. London: Routledge.
6.
CattonPhilip E.1999. Counter-insurgency and nation building: The strategic hamlet program in South Vietnam, 1961–1963. International History Review21 (4): 853–1136.
7.
ChengTun-jen. 1990. Political regimes and development strategies: South Korea and Taiwan. In Manufacturing miracles, eds. GereffiGaryWymanDonald, 139–78. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
ChungYoung-Iob. 2007. South Korea in the fast lane: Economic development and capital formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
ColeDavid C.LymanPrinceton N.1971. Korean development: The interplay of politics and economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
CumingsBruce. 1981. The origins of the Korean War: Liberation and the emergence of separate regimes 1945–1947. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
CumingsBruce. 1984. The origins and development of the northeast Asian political economy: Industrial sectors, product cycles, and political consequences, ed. DeyoFrederic C.International Organization38 (1): 1–40.
12.
CumingsBruce. 1999. Parallax visions: Making sense of American-East Asian relations. London: Duke University Press.
13.
DacyDouglas C.1986. Foreign aid, war, and economic development: South Vietnam, 1955–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
EckertCarter J.1991. Offspring of empire: The Koch’ang Kims and the colonial origins of Korean capitalism, 1876–1945. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
15.
EckertCarter J.LeeKi-baikLewYoung IckRobinsonMichaelWagnerEdward W.1991. Korea old and new: A history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
GillsBarry K.2000. The crisis of postwar East Asian capitalism: American power, democracy and the vicissitudes of globalization. Review of International Studies26 (3): 381–403.
17.
GoldThomas B.1986. State and society in the Taiwan miracle. New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
18.
GoldThomas B.1988. Colonial origins of Taiwanese capitalism. In Contending approaches to the political economy of Taiwan, eds. WincklerEdwin A.GreenhalghSusan M., 101–17. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
19.
HaggardStephan. 1990. Pathways from the periphery: The politics of growth in the newly industrializing countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
HamiltonClive. 1983. Capitalist industrialization in East Asia’s four little tigers. Journal of Contemporary Asia13 (1): 35–73.
21.
HershJacques.1993. The USA and the rise of East Asia since 1945: Dilemmas of the postwar international political economy. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
22.
HoSamuel P. S.1978. Economic development of Taiwan, 1860–1970. London: Yale University Press.
23.
JacobyNeil H.1966. US aid to Taiwan: A study of foreign aid, self-help, and development. London: Frederick A. Praeger.
24.
JohnsonChalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
KayCristóbal. 2002. Why East Asia overtook Latin America: Agrarian reform, industrialization and development. Third World Quarterly23 (6): 1073–1102.
26.
KohliAtul. 1994. Where do high growth political economies come from? The Japanese lineage of Korea’s “developmental state.”World Development22 (9): 1269–93.
27.
KruegerAnne O.1979. The developmental role of the foreign sector and aid. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
LathamMichael E.2006. Redirecting the revolution? The USA and the failure of nation-building in South Vietnam. Third World Quarterly27 (1): 27–41. doi:10.1080/01436590500368743
29.
LawrenceMark Atwood. 2008. The Vietnam war: A concise international history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
MoonChung-inJunByung-joon. 2011. Modernization strategy: Ideas and influences. In The Park Chung Hee era: The transformation of South Korea, eds. KimByung-KookVogelEzra F., 115–39. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
MurrayMartin J.1980. The development of capitalism in Indochina (1870–1940). London: University of California Press.
32.
NgoTak-Wing. 2005. The political bases of episodic agency in the Taiwan state. In Asian states: Beyond the developmental perspective, eds. BoydRichardNgoTak-Wing, 83–109. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
33.
ProstermanRoy L.1970. Land-to-the-tiller in South Vietnam: The tables turn. Asian Survey10 (8): 751–64.
34.
RoyDenny. 2003. Taiwan: A political history. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
SansomRobert L.1970. The economics of insurgency in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
SteinbergDavid I.1985. On foreign aid and the development of the Republic of Korea: The effectiveness of concessional assistance. Washington, DC: World Bank.
37.
StubbsRichard. 1989. Geopolitics and the political economy of Southeast Asia. International Journal44 (3): 517–40.
TsaiHui-Yu Caroline. 2006. Shaping administration in colonial Taiwan, 1895–1945. In Taiwan under Japanese colonial rule, 1895–1945, eds. LiaoPing-HuiWAngDavid Der-Wei, 97–121. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
40.
WadeRobert. 1990. Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
WadeRobert. 1992. East Asia’s economic success: Conflicting perspectives, partial insights, shaky evidence. World Politics44 (January): 270–320.
42.
WallersteinImmanuel Maurice. 1979. The capitalist world-economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
WallersteinImmanuel Maurice. 1997. The rise of East Asia, or the world system in the twenty-first century. In Keynote address at the symposium on “perspective of the capitalist world-system in the beginning of the twenty-first century.” Institute of International Studies, Meiji Gakuin University, Tokyo.
44.
WangHong-zen. 2002. Class structures and social mobility in Taiwan in the initial post-war period. The China Journal48 (July): 55–85.
45.
WiegersmaNancy. 1988. Vietnam—Peasant land, peasant revolution: Patriarchy and collectivity in the rural economy. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
46.
WiegersmaNancyMedleyJoseph E.2000. US ecnomic development policies towards the Pacific rim: Successes and failures of US aid. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
47.
WooJung-En. 1991. Race to the swift: State and finance in Korean industrialization. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
