Individuals participating in the HUD Housing Choice Voucher program, formerly Section 8, can rent units in the private market and are not tied to public housing projects in a specific neighborhood. We would expect vouchers to help poor families leave the ghetto and move to more diverse communities with higher socioeconomic opportunity, but many voucher holders remain concentrated in poor, segregated communities. We use longitudinal qualitative data from one hundred low-income African American families in Mobile, Alabama, to explore this phenomenon, finding that tenants’ limited housing search resources, involuntary mobility, landlord practices, and several aspects of the voucher program itself limit families’ ability to escape disadvantaged areas. We also find that the voucher program’s regulations and funding structures do not incentivize housing authorities to promote neighborhood mobility and residential choice. This combination of forces often keeps voucher recipients in neighborhoods with high concentrations of poor and minority residents.
Acevedo-GarciaDoloresLochnerKimberly A.OsypukTheresa L.SubramanianS. V.2003. Future directions in residential segregation and health research: A multilevel approach. American Journal of Public Health93 (2): 215–21.
2.
AneshenselCarol S.SucoffClea A.1996. The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior37:293–310.
3.
BasoloVictoria. 2003. Local response to federal changes in the housing voucher program: A case study of intraregional cooperation. Housing Policy Debate14 (1–2): 143–68.
4.
BasoloVictoriaNguyenMai Thi. 2005. Does mobility matter? The neighborhood conditions of housing voucher holders by race and ethnicity. Housing Policy Debate16 (3–4): 297–324.
5.
BeenVickiEllenIngrid Gould, eds. 2011. Rental housing policy in the United States. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research13 (2).
6.
BickfordAdamMasseyDouglas S.1991. Segregation in the second ghetto: Racial and ethnic segregation in American public housing, 1977. Social Forces69 (4): 1011–36.
7.
BollandJohn M.2003. Hopelessness and risk behaviour among adolescents living in high-poverty inner-city neighbourhoods. Journal of Adolescence26:145–58.
8.
BonastiaChristopher. 2008. Knocking on the door: The federal government’s attempt to desegregate the suburbs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BoydMelody L.EdinKathrynClampet-LundquistSusanDuncanGreg J.2010. The durability of gains from the Gautreaux Two residential mobility program: A qualitative analysis of who stays and who moves from low-poverty neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate20 (1): 119–46.
10.
BriggsXavier de Souza. 1997. Moving up versus moving out: Neighborhood effects in housing mobility programs. Housing Policy Debate8 (1): 195–234.
11.
BriggsXavier de SouzaPopkinSusan J.GoeringJohn M.2010. Moving to Opportunity: The story of an American experiment to fight ghetto poverty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
Brooks-GunnJeanneDuncanGreg J.AberJ. Lawrence. 1997. Neighborhood poverty: Context and consequences for children. vol. 1. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
Brooks-GunnJeanneDuncanGreg J.KlebanovPamelaSealandNaomi. 1993. Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development?American Journal of Sociology99:353–95.
14.
Burdick-WillJuliaLudwigJensRaudenbushStephen W.SampsonRobert J.SanbonmatsuLisaSharkeyPatrick. 2011. Converging evidence for neighborhood effects on children’s test scores: An experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational comparison. In Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances, eds. DuncanGreg J.MurnaneRichard, 255–77. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
CarlsonDevenHavemanRobertKaplanTomWolfeBarbara. 2012. Long-term earnings and employment effects of housing voucher receipt. Journal of Urban Economics71 (1): 128–50.
16.
ClarkWilliam A. V.2008. Reexamining the Moving to Opportunity study and its contribution to changing the distribution of poverty and ethnic concentration. Demography45 (3): 515–35.
17.
ClimacoCarissaRodgersChristopher N.FeinsJudithLamKen. 2008. Portability moves in the Housing Choice Voucher Program, 1998–2005. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research10 (1): 5–40.
18.
Code of Federal Regulations. 2001. 24 CFR Ch. IX § 985.3 Indicators, HUD verification methods and ratings.
19.
DeLucaStefanieDaytonElizabeth. 2009. Switching social contexts: The effects of housing mobility and school choice programs on youth outcomes. Annual Review of Sociology35 (1): 457–91.
20.
DeLucaStefanieDuncanGregMendenhallRubyKeelsMicere. 2010. Gautreaux mothers and their children: An update. Housing Policy Debate20:7–25.
21.
DeLucaStefanieRosenbaumJames E.2003. If low income blacks are given a chance to live in white neighborhoods, will they stay? Examining mobility patterns in a quasi-experimental program with administrative data. Housing Policy Debate14 (3): 305–46.
22.
DeLucaStefanieRosenblattPeter. 2009. Walking away from The Wire: Residential mobility and opportunity in Baltimore. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, 8–11 August, San Francisco, CA.
23.
DeLucaStefanieRosenblattPeter. 2010. Does moving to better neighborhoods lead to better schooling opportunities? Parental school choice in an experimental housing voucher program. Teachers College Record112 (5): 1441–89.
24.
DeLucaStefanieRosenblattPeter. 2011. Increasing access to high performing schools in an assisted housing voucher program. Report Prepared by the Poverty and Race Research Action Council (PRRAC) for the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Education, Research Policy Roundtable: Coordinating Housing and Education Policy to Support Racial and Economic Integration, Washington, DC.
25.
DeLucaStefanieWoodHollyRosenblattPeter. 2011. Why poor people move (and where they go): Residential mobility, selection, and stratification. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, 22 August, Las Vegas, NV.
26.
DevineDeborah J.GrayRobert W.RubinLesterTaghaviLydia B.2003. Housing Choice Voucher location patterns: Implications for participant and neighborhood welfare. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Available from www.huduser.org.
27.
DownsAnthony. 2008. Introduction: Why rental housing is the neglected child of American shelter. In Revisiting rental housing, eds. RetsinasNicolas P.BelskyEric S., 1–13. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
28.
FarleyReynoldsSteehCharlotteKrysanMariaJacksonTaraReevesKeith. 1994. Stereotypes and segregation: Neighborhoods in the Detroit area. American Journal of Sociology100 (3): 750–80.
29.
FauthRebecca C.LeventhalTamaBrooks-GunnJeanne. 2004. Short-term effects of moving from public housing in poor to middle-class neighborhoods on low-income, minority adults’ outcomes. Social Science & Medicine59 (11): 2271–84.
30.
FeinsJudith D.ShroderMark D.2005. Moving to Opportunity: The demonstration’s design and its effects on mobility. Urban Studies42 (8): 1275–99.
31.
FinkelMerylBuronLarry. 2001. Study on Section 8 voucher success rates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Research and Development.
FrankenbergEricaDebrayElizabeth. 2011. Integrating schools in a changing society: New policies and legal options for a multiracial generation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
34.
GalsterGeorge C.2008. U.S. housing scholarship, planning, and policy since 1968. Journal of the American Planning Association74 (1): 5–16.
35.
GalvezMartha. 2010. Getting past “no”: Housing Choice Voucher holders’ experiences with discrimination and search costs. Unpublished working paper.
36.
GalvezMartha. 2011. What do we know about Housing Choice Voucher program neighborhood outcomes? A review of the literature on voucher holders’ location outcomes and neighborhood preferences. Unpublished working paper.
37.
GlaeserEdward L.2011. Rethinking the federal bias toward homeownership. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research13 (2): 5–37.
38.
GoetzEdward G.2002. Forced relocation vs. voluntary mobility: The effects of dispersal programmes on households. Housing Studies17 (1): 107–23.
GoetzEdward G.2011. Where have all the towers gone? The dismantling of public housing in U.S. cities. Journal of Urban Affairs33 (3): 267–87.
41.
GreenRichard K.2011. Thoughts on rental housing and rental housing assistance. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research13 (2): 39–55.
42.
GreenleeAndrew Jordan. 2011. A different lens: Administrative perspectives on portability in Illinois’ Housing Choice Voucher program. Housing Policy Debate21 (3): 377–403.
43.
HirschArnold R.1983. Making the second ghetto: Race and housing in Chicago 1940–1960. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University. 2011. America’s rental housing: Meeting challenges, building on opportunities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
JulianElizabeth K.DanielMichael M.2009. HUD-assisted low-income housing: Is it working and for whom?Poverty and Race18 (4): 3–4.
46.
JulianElizabeth K.McCainDemetria. 2010. Housing mobility: A civil right. In The integration debate: Competing futures for American cities, eds. SquiresGregoryHartmanChester, 85–98. New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
KatzBruce J.TurnerAustin. 2001. Who should run the housing voucher program? A reform proposal. Housing Policy Debate12 (2): 239–62.
48.
KatzBruce J.TurnerAustin. 2008. Rethinking U.S. rental housing policy: A new blueprint for federal, state, and local action. In Revisiting rental housing, eds. RetsinasNicolas P.BelskyEric S., 319–58. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
49.
KeelsMicere. 2008. Residential attainment of now-adult Gautreaux children: Do they gain, hold or lose ground in neighborhood ethnic and economic segregation?Housing Studies23 (4): 541–64.
50.
KeelsMicereDuncanGreg J.DelucaStefanieMendenhallRubyRosenbaumJames E.2005. Fifteen years later: Can residential mobility programs provide a long-term escape from neighborhood segregation, crime, and poverty?Demography42:51–73.
51.
KhadduriJill. 2001. Deconcentration: What do we mean? What do we want?Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research5 (2): 69–84.
52.
KingsleyG. ThomasJohnsonJenniferPettitKathryn S.2003. Patterns of Section 8 relocation in the HOPE VI program. Journal of Urban Affairs25 (4): 427–47.
53.
KotlowitzAlex. 1991. There are no children here: The story of two boys growing up in the other America. New York, NY: Anchor.
54.
KrueckebergDonald A.1999. The grapes of rent: A history of renting in a country of owners. Housing Policy Debate10 (1): 9–30.
55.
KrysanMariaBaderMichael. 2007. Perceiving the metropolis: Seeing the city through a prism of race. Social Forces86 (2): 699–733.
56.
KrysanMariaCouperMick P.FarleyReynoldsFormanTyrone. 2009. Does race matter in neighborhood preferences? Results from a video experiment. American Journal of Sociology115 (2): 527–59.
57.
KrysanMariaFarleyReynolds. 2002. The residential preferences of blacks: Do they explain persistent segregation?Social Forces80 (3): 937–80.
58.
LandisJohn D.McClureKirk. 2010. Rethinking federal housing policy. Journal of the American Planning Association76 (3): 319–48.
59.
LoebSusannaReiningerMichelle. 2004. Public policy and teacher labor markets: What we know and why it matters. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Education Policy Center.
60.
MallachAllan. 2006. Landlords at the margins: Exploring the dynamics of the one to four unit rental housing industry. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies. Available from www.jchs.harvard.edu.
61.
MarrMatthew D.2005. Mitigating apprehension about Section 8 vouchers: The positive role of housing specialists in search and placement. Housing Policy Debate16 (1): 85–111.
62.
MasseyDouglas S.DentonNancy. 1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
McClureKirk. 2008. Deconcentrating poverty with housing programs. Journal of the American Planning Association74 (1): 90–99.
64.
McClureKirk. 2011. Should low-income housing tax credits and Housing Choice Vouchers be fungible? In Fair and affordable housing in the U.S., eds. SilvermanRobert MarkPattersonKelly L., 213–42. Boston, MA: Brill.
65.
National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. 1968. 1968 Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
66.
National Housing Law Project. 2002. False HOPE: A critical assessment of the HOPE VI public housing redevelopment program. Oakland, CA: National Housing Law Project.
67.
NewmanSandra J.2005. Low-end rental housing: The forgotten story in Baltimore’s housing boom. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
68.
OrfieldGaryLeeChungmei. 2006. Racial transformation and changing nature of segregation. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
69.
OrrLarry L.FeinsJudith D.JacobRobinBeecroftErikSanbonmatsuLisaKatzLawrence F.LiebmanJeffrey B.KlingJeffrey R.2003. Moving to Opportunity interim impacts evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
70.
OwensAnn. 2012. The new geography of subsidized housing: Implications for urban poverty. PhD diss., Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
71.
PendallRolf. 2000. Why voucher and certificate users live in distressed neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate11 (4): 881–910.
72.
PietilaAntero. 2010. Not in my neighborhood: How bigotry shaped a great American city. Lanham, MD: Ivan R. Dee.
PolikoffAlexander. 2006. Waiting for Gautreaux: A story of segregation, housing, and the black ghetto. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
75.
PopkinSusanCoveElizabeth. 2007. Safety is the most important thing: How HOPE VI helped families. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Available from www.urban.org.
76.
PopkinSusan J.GalsterGeorge C.TemkinKennethHerbigCarlaLevyDiane K.RicherElise K.2003. Obstacles to desegregating public housing: Lessons learned from implementing eight consent decrees. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management22:179–99.
77.
PopkinSusan J.LevyDiane K.BuronLarry. 2009. Has HOPE VI transformed residents’ lives? New evidence from the HOPE VI panel study. Housing Studies24 (4): 477–502.
78.
PopkinSusan J.LevyDiane K.HarrisLaura E.ComeyJenniferCunninghamMary K.BurtonLarry F.2004. The HOPE VI program: What about the residents?Housing Policy Debate15 (2): 385–414.
79.
QuerciaRoberto G.GalsterGeorge C.1997. The challenges facing public housing authorities in a brave new world. Housing Policy Debate8 (3): 535–69.
80.
QuigleyJohn M.2008. Just suppose: Housing subsidies for low-income renters. In Revisiting rental housing, eds. RetsinasNicolas P.BelskyEric S., 300–18. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
81.
RiceDouglasSardBarbara. 2009. Decade of neglect has weakened federal low-income housing programs. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
82.
RosenblattPeterDeLucaStefanie. 2012. “We don’t live outside, we live in here”: Residential mobility decisions among low-income families. City and Community11 (3): 254–84.
83.
RossLauren M.ShlayAnne B.PiconMario G.2012. You can’t always get what you want: The role of public housing and vouchers in achieving residential satisfaction. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research14 (1): 35–54.
84.
RossStephen L.TurnerMargery Austin. 2005. Housing discrimination in metropolitan America: Explaining changes between 1989 and 2000. Social Problems52 (2): 152–80.
85.
SampsonRobert J.SharkeyPatrickRaudenbushStephen W.2008. Durable effects of concentrated disadvantage on verbal ability among African-American children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences105 (3): 845–52.
86.
SanbonmatsuLisaLudwigJensKatzLawrence F.GennetianLisa A.DuncanGreg J.KesslerRonald C.AdamEmmaMcDadeThomas W.LindauStacy Tessler. 2011. Moving to Opportunity for fair housing demonstration program: Final impacts evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
87.
SchwartzAlex F.2010. Housing policy In the United States. 2nd ed.New York, NY: Routledge.
88.
SharkeyPatrick. 2010. The acute effect of local homicides on children’s cognitive performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107:11733–38.
89.
ShlayAnne B.2006. Low-income homeownership: American dream or delusion?Urban Studies43 (3): 511–31.
90.
ShlayAnne B.November2011. Panel comments at the annual meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC.
91.
SmithRobin E.NaparstekArthurPopkinSusanBartlettLesleyBatesLisaCignaJessicaCraneRussellVinsonElisa. 2002. Housing choice for HOPE VI relocatees. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
92.
SugrueThomas. 1996. The origins of the urban crisis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
93.
TegelerPhilip. 2010. Continuing barriers to housing choice and integration in HUD’s Section 8 Voucher program: Introduction to Mike Hanley’s presentation at HUD on “Mapping the Picture of Subsidized Households’ to Further Fair Housing.” Unpublished document in authors’ files.
94.
TegelerPhilip D.HanleyMichael L.LibenJudith. 1995. Transforming Section 8: Using federal housing subsidies to promote individual housing choice and desegregation. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review30:451–85.
95.
TurnerMargery Austin. 1998. Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenant-based housing assistance. Housing Policy Debate9 (2): 373–94.
96.
TurneyKristinKissaneRebeccaEdinKathryn. 2011. The greenery, it softens you: Adult mental health after Moving to Opportunity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC.
97.
TurnhamJenniferWoodMichelleAbbenanteMichelleCortesAlvaro. 2006. Evaluation of the housing voucher program: Housing affordability and family well being. Washington, DC: Abt Associates.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2001. Voucher program guidebook: Housing choice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Available from portal.hud.gov.
100.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2007a. Fair market rents for the Section 8 housing assistance payments program [database online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Available from www.huduser.org.
101.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2007b. Picture of subsidized households [database online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Available from www.huduser.org.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2011. Tabulation of 2012 fair market rents [database online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Available from www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/fmr.html.
104.
U.S. National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing. 1992. The final report of the National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing: A report to Congress and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
105.
VaradyDavidWalkerCarole. 2000. Vouchering out distressed subsidized developments: Does moving lead to improvements in housing and neighborhood conditions?Housing Policy Debate11 (1): 115–62.
106.
WangXinhaoVaradyDavid P.2005. Using hot spot analysis to study the clustering of Section 8 housing voucher families. Housing Studies20 (1): 29–48.
107.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1987. The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
108.
WilsonWilliam Julius.1996. When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York, NY: Knopf.
109.
WoodHolly Michelle. 2011. When only a house makes a home: The roles of neighborhood and dwelling in the residential decision-making of lower-income, inner-city black families. Unpublished manuscript.
110.
YingerJohn. 1997. Closed doors, opportunities lost: The continuing costs of housing discrimination. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
