The article addresses the questions, What do children in urban areas do on Saturdays? What types of organizational resources do they have access to? Does this vary by social class? Using diary data on children’s activities on Saturdays in the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale metropolitan area, the authors describe the different types of venues (households, businesses, public space, associations, charities, congregations, and government/tribal agencies) that served different types of children. They find that the likelihood of using a charity or business rather than a government or tribal provider increased with family income. Also, the likelihood of using a congregation or a government facility rather than a business, charity, or household increased with being Hispanic. The authors discuss the implications for the urban division of labor on Saturdays and offer research questions that need further investigation.
AgrestiAlan. 1996. An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
2.
AllardScott W.TolmanRichardRosenDaniel. 2003. Proximity to service providers and service utilization among welfare recipients: The interaction of place and race. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management22 (4): 599–613.
3.
AustinS. BrynMelleySteven J.SanchezBrisa N.PatelAartiBukaStephenGortmakerSteven. 2005. Clustering of fast-food restaurants around schools: A novel application of spatial statistics to the study of food environments. American Journal of Public Health95 (9): 1575–81.
4.
BianchiSuzanne M.RobinsonJohn P.1997. What did you do today? Children’s use of time, family composition, and the acquisition of social capital. Journal of Marriage and Family59 (2): 332–44.
5.
BianchiSuzanne M.RobinsonJohn P.MilkieMelissa A.2006. Changing rhythms of American family life. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
BlusteinJanHoyEmma C.2000. Who is enrolled in for-profit vs. nonprofit Medicare HMOs? Health Affairs19 (1): 210–20.
7.
BourdieuPierre. 1977. Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In Power and ideology in education, eds. KarabellJeromeHalseyA. H., 481–551. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
BozemanBarry. 1987. All organizations are public: Bridging public and private organizational theories. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
ClarkeLeeEstesCarroll. 1992. Sociological and economic theories of markets and nonprofits: Evidence from home health organizations. American Journal of Sociology97 (4): 945–69.
ClotfelterCharles T., ed. 1992. Who benefits from the nonprofit sector?Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
ColemanJames S.HofferThomasKilgoreSally B.1982. High school achievement: Public, Catholic and other schools compared. New York, NY: Basic Books.
13.
CooperHarrisValentineJeffreyNyeBarbaraLindsayJames. 1999. Relationships between five after-school activities and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology91 (2): 369–78.
14.
DiMaggioPaulAnheierHelmut. 1990. The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors. Annual Review of Sociology16 (1): 137–59.
15.
DunnJanet S.KinneyDavid A.HofferthSandra L.2003. Parental ideologies and children’s after school activities. American Behavioral Scientist46 (10): 1359–86.
16.
EdwardsBill. 12March2004. Valley youth activity provider survey. Methodological memo, Survey Research Laboratory, Arizona State University, Tempe.
17.
FeaginJoe R.1991. The continuing significance of race: Antiblack discrimination in public places. American Sociological Review56 (1): 101–16.
18.
FerrisJamesGradyElizabeth. 1989. Fading distinctions among the nonprofit, government and for-profit sectors. In The future of the nonprofit sector, eds. HodgkinsonVirginiaLymanRichard, 123–41. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
19.
FrumkinPeterGalaskiewiczJoseph. 2004. Institutional isomorphism and public sector organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14:283–307.
20.
GalaskiewiczJosephHoborGeorgeDucklesBethMayorovaOlga V.2012. Caregivers’ social capital and satisfaction with their children’s service providers. Sociological Perspectives55 (2): 241–66.
21.
GoodmanLeo A.1996. A single general method for the analysis of cross-classified data: Reconciliation and synthesis of some methods of Pearson, Yule, and Fisher, and also some methods of correspondence analysis and association analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association91:408–28.
22.
GreenacreMichael J.1984. Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press.
23.
HanksMichaelEcklandBruce K.1978. Adult voluntary associations and adolescent socialization. Sociological Quarterly19:481–90.
24.
HannanMichael T.FreemanJohn. 1989. Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
HansmannHenry. 1996. The ownership of enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
26.
HarveyAndrew S.1999. Guidelines for time use data collection and analysis. In Time use research in the social sciences, eds. PentlandWendy E.HarveyAndrew S.LawtonM. PowellMcCollMary Ann, 19–45. New York, NY: Kluwer.
27.
HofferthSandra L.SandbergJohn F.2001. How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and Family63 (May): 295–308.
28.
HoffmannJohnXuJiangmin. 2002. School activities, community service, and delinquency. Crime and Delinquency48 (4): 568–91.
HouMoynihanDonald P.2008. The case for countercyclical fiscal capacity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18 (1): 139–59.
31.
HsungRay-MayBreigerRonald L.2009. Position generators, affiliations, and the institutional logics of social capital: A study of Taiwan firms and individuals. In Contexts of social capital: Social networks in markets, communities, and families, eds. HsungRay-MayLinNanBreigerRonald L., 3–27. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 2012a. Exempt purposes—Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3). U.S. Department of the Treasury. Available from http://www.irs.gov (accessed 15 September 2012).
33.
IRS. 2012b. Exemption requirements: Section 501(c)(3) organizations. U.S. Department of the Treasury. Available from http://www.irs.gov (accessed 15 September 2012).
34.
IRS. 2012c. Inurement/private benefit—Charitable organizations. U.S. Department of the Treasury. Available from http://www.irs.gov (accessed 15 September 2012).
35.
JamesEstelle. 1986. How nonprofits grow: A model. In The economics of nonprofit institutions: Studies in structure and policy, ed. Rose-AckermanSusan, 185–95. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
KahnFaith. 1997. Pandora’s box: Managerial discretion and the problem of corporate philanthropy. UCLA Law Review44 (3): 579–676.
37.
KahneJosephBaileyKim. 1999. The role of social capital and youth development: The case of “I have a dream” programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis21 (3): 321–43.
38.
KipkeMichele D.IversonEllenMooreDeborahBookerCaraRuelasValeriePetersAnne L.KaufmanFrancine. 2006. Food and park environments: Neighborhood-level risks for childhood obesity in East Los Angeles. Journal of Adolescent Health40:325–33.
39.
KushmanJohn E.1979. A three-sector model of day care center services. Journal of Human Resources14 (4): 543–62.
40.
LareauAnnette. 2002. Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review67 (5): 747–76.
41.
LareauAnnette. 2003. Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
42.
LittleRoderick J. A.RubinDonald B.1987. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: Wiley.
43.
LoflandLyn H.1973. A world of strangers: Order and action in urban public space. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
44.
MarshHerbertKleitmanSabina. 2002. Extracurricular school activities: The good, the bad, and the nonlinear. Harvard Educational Review72 (4): 464–515.
45.
MarwellNicole P.2007. Bargaining for Brooklyn: Community organizations in the entrepreneurial city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
McFarlandDanielThomasReuben. 2006. Bowling young: How youth voluntary associations influence adult political participation. American Sociological Review71 (3): 401–25.
47.
McPhersonJ. Miller. 1983. An ecology of affiliation. American Sociological Review48 (4): 519–35.
48.
McPhersonJ. MillerSmith-LovinLynneCookKaren. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology27:415–44.
49.
MedrichElliott A.RoizenJudith A.RubinVictorBuckleyStuart. 1982. The serious business of growing up: A study of children’s lives outside school. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
50.
MooreLatetia V.RouxAna V. Diez. 2006. Associations of neighborhood characteristics with the location and type of food stores. American Journal of Public Health96:325–31.
51.
MooreLatetia V.RouxAna V. DiezEvensonKelly R.McGinnAileen P.BrinesShannon J.2008. Availability of recreational resources in minority and low socioeconomic status areas. American Journal of Preventive Medicine34 (1): 16–22.
52.
MooreMark H.1995. Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
MorlandKimberlyWingSteveRouxAna DiezPooleCharles. 2002. Neighborhood characteristics associated with the location of food stores and food service places. American Journal of Preventive Medicine22 (1): 23–29.
54.
MyersDowell. 2002. Demographic dynamism in Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, and Washington, D.C. In From Chicago to L.A.: Making sense of urban theory, ed. DearMichael J., 17–54. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
OkadaSosuke.2011. The relational structure of musical taste. Master’s of Arts Paper, Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson.
56.
OlfsonMarkMechanicDavid. 1996. Mental disorders in public, private nonprofit, and proprietary general hospitals. American Journal of Psychiatry153:1613–19.
57.
OttoLuther B.1976. Social integration and the status-attainment process. American Journal of Sociology81:1360–83.
58.
PowellLisa M.ChaloupkaFrank J.BaoYanjun. 2007. The availability of fast-food and full-service restaurants in the United States: Associations with neighborhood characteristics. American Journal of Preventive Medicine33 (4S): S240–45.
59.
PowellLisa M.SlaterSandyMirtchevaDonkaBaoYanjunChaloupkaFrank J.2007. Food store availability and neighborhood characteristics in the United States. Preventive Medicine44:189–95.
60.
RaineyHal G.1997. Understanding and managing public organizations. 2nd ed.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61.
RobinsonJohn R.1999. Time diary method: Structure and uses. In Time use research in the social sciences, eds. PentlandPentland Wendy E.HarveyAndrew S.LawtonM. PowellMcCollMary Ann, 47–89. New York, NY: Kluwer.
62.
SchlesingerMark. 1998. Mismeasuring the consequences of ownership: External influences and the comparative performance of public, for-profit, and private nonprofit organizations. In Private action and the public good, eds. PowellWalter W.ClemensElisabeth, 85–113. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
63.
SchlesingerMarkDorwartRobert. 1984. Ownership and mental-health services. New England Journal of Medicine311 (15): 959–65.
64.
SchlesingerMarkMitchellShannonGrayBradford. 2003. Measuring community benefits provided by nonprofit and for-profit HMOs. Inquiry40 (2): 114–32.
65.
SimonJohnDaleHarveyChisolmLaura. 2012. The federal tax treatment of charitable organizations. In The nonprofit sector: A research handbook, 2nd edition, eds. PowellWalter W.SteinbergRichard, 267–306. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
66.
SisterMaria Chona E.2007. Do blacks and browns have less green? Examining the distribution of park and open space resources in the greater Los Angeles metropolitan region. PhD diss., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
67.
SmallMario Luis. 2009. Unanticipated gains: Origins of network inequality in everyday life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
68.
SmallMario LuisMcDermottMonica. 2006. The presence of organizational resources in poor urban neighborhoods: An analysis of average and contextual effects. Social Forces84 (3): 1697–1724.
69.
SpadyWilliam G.1970. Lament for the letterman: Effects of peer status and extracurricular activities on goals and achievement. American Journal of Sociology75:680–702.
70.
SteinbergRichardGrayBradford H.1993. The role of nonprofit enterprise in 1993: Hansmann revisited. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly22 (4): 297–316.
71.
TimmerSusan GoffEcclesJacquelynneO’BrienKerth. 1985. How children use time. In Time, goods, and well-being, eds. JusterF. ThomasStaffordFrank P., 353–82. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
72.
ValentineJeffreyCooperHarrisBettencourtB. AnnDuBoisDavid. 2002. Out-of-school activities and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-beliefs. Educational Psychologist37 (4): 245–56.
73.
VerbaSchlozmanKay L.BradyHenry E.1995. Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
WamsleyGary L.ZaldMayer N.1973. The political economy of public organizations: A critique and approach to the study of public administration. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
75.
Watkins-HayesCeleste. 2011. Peace, respect, and red tape: Inside the black box of racially representative bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory21 (Supplement): 233–51.
76.
WeisbrodBurton A.1988. The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77.
WeisbrodBurton A.1998. Institutional form and organizational behavior. In Private action and the public good, eds. PowellWalter W.ClemensElisabeth, 69–84. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
78.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1987. The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
79.
WingKennard T.PollakThomas H.BlackwoodAmy. 2008. The nonprofit almanac 2008. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
80.
WolpertJulian. 1993. Decentralization and equity in public and nonprofit sectors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly22 (4): 281–96.
81.
WolpertJulian. 1996. Half a loaf: The limits of charity in the nineties. New York, NY: Twentieth Century Fund.
