This article investigates the transition tempo and life course orientation of Taiwanese young adults in their early 20s. The results indicate that Taiwanese young adults experience a prolonged transition tempo and delay their entry into adult roles. The rate of transitioning to family roles is low for young adults at this stage. There are significant gender differences in life course orientation toward marriage, parenthood, and employment, with young women having a clearer picture in mind than do young men. Age 30 appears to have become the new threshold when young adults schedule their marriage plans, with parenthood significantly later in life. Multivariate analyses suggest that young adults who hold more traditional attitudes about gender roles are more likely to start parenthood before age 30. However, when the tempo of education completion and initiation of employment is controlled for, the effect of gender role attitudes becomes nonsignificant.
BernhardtEvaGählerMichaelGoldscheiderFrances. 2005. Childhood family structure and routes out of the parental home in Sweden. ACTA Sociologica48 (2): 99–115.
2.
ChattopadhyayArpitaMarshRobert. 1999. Changes in living arrangement and familial support for the elderly in Taiwan: 1963–1991. Journal of Comparative Family Studies30 (3): 526–37.
3.
CherlinAndrew J.ScabiniEugeniaRossiGiovanna, eds. 1997. Still in the nest. Delayed home leaving in Europe and the United States. Journal of Family Issues18 (6): 572–75.
4.
ChuCyrusYuRuoh-Rong. 2010. Understanding Chinese families: A comparative study of Taiwan and Southeast China. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
Du Bois-ReymondM. 1998. I don’t want to commit myself yet: Young people’s life concept. Journal of Youth Studies1 (1): 63–79.
6.
FonerAnne. 1996. Age norms and the structure of consciousness: Some final comments. The Gerontologist36 (2): 221–23.
7.
FurstenbergFrank F.Jr.2010. On a new schedule: Transitions to adulthood and family change. The Future of Children20 (1): 67–87.
8.
FussellElizabeth. 2002. The transition to adulthood in aging societies. The Annals of the America Academy of Political and Social Science580:16–38.
9.
FussellElizabethGauthierAnne H.EvansAnn. 2007. Heterogeneity in the transition to adulthood: The cases of Australia, Canada, and the United States. European Journal of Population23 (3): 389–414.
10.
GierveldJenny de JongLiefbroerAart C.BeekinkErik. 1991. The effect of parental resources on patterns of leaving home among young adults in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review7 (1): 55–71.
11.
GoldscheiderFrancesDaVanzoJulie. 1989. Pathways to independent living in early adulthood: Marriage, semiautonomy and premarital residential independence. Demography26:597–614.
12.
GoldscheiderFrancesGoldscheiderCalvin. 1993. Leaving home before marriage: Ethnicity, familism, and generational relationships. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
13.
GrantMonica J.FurstenbergFrank F.Jr.2007. Changes in the transition to adulthood in less developed countries. European Journal of Population23:415–28.
14.
HangoDarcy W.BourdaisCeline Le. 2007. Early union formation in Canada: Links with education. European Journal of Population23:339–68.
15.
HarevenTamara K.AdamsKathleen. 2004. Leaving home: Individual or family strategies. In The road to independence, eds. PoppelFrances vanOrisMichelLeeJames, 339–65. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
16.
HoganDennis P.1981. Transitions and social change: The early lives of American men. New York, NY: Academic Press.
17.
JacobMaritaKleinertCorinna. 2008. Does unemployment help or hinder becoming independent? The role of employment status for leaving the parental home. European Sociological Review24 (2): 141–53.
18.
KohliMartin.1986. Social organization and subjective construction of the life course. In Human development and the life course: Multidisciplinary perspectives, eds. SorensenAage B.WeinertFranz E.SherrodLonnie R., 271–92. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
LiefbroerAart C.GerritsenLiesbeth. 1994. The influence of intentions and life course factors on union formation behavior of young adults. Journal of Marriage and the Family56 (1): 193–203.
20.
MariniMargaret M.1984. Age and sequencing norms in the transition to adulthood. Social Forces63 (1): 229–44.
21.
ModelJohnFurstenbergFrank F.Jr.HershbergTheodore. 1976. Social change and transition to adulthood in historical perspective. Journal of Family History1:7–32.
22.
NeugartenBerniceHagestadGunhild O.1976. Age and the life course. In Handbook of aging and the social science, eds. BinstockRobertShanasE., 35–55. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
23.
NeugartenBerniceMooreJoan W.LoweJohn C.1965. Age norms, age constrains and adult socialization. American Journal of Sociology70 (6): 710–17.
24.
RossiGiovanna. 1997. The nestlings: Why young adults stay at home longer: The case of Italy. Journal of Family Issues18:627–44.
25.
SasslerSharonCiambroneDesireeBenwayGaelan. 2008. Are they really mama’s boys/daddy’s girls? The negotiation of adulthood upon returning to the parental home. Sociological Forum23 (4): 670–98.
26.
SchnaibergAllanGoldenbergSheldon. 1989. From empty nest to crowded nest: The dynamics of incompletely-launched young adults. Social Problems36 (3): 251–69.
27.
SchoeniRobert F.RossKaren E.2005. Material assistance from families during the transition to adulthood. In On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy, eds. SetterstenRichard A.Jr.FurstenbergFrank F.Jr.RumbautRubén G, 339–65. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
SetterstenRichard A.Jr.1997. The salience of age in the life course. Human Development40:257–81.
29.
SetterstenRichard A.Jr.1998. A time to leave home and a time never to return? Age constraints on the living arrangement of young adults. Social Forces6 (4): 1373–1400.
30.
SetterstenRichard A.Jr.2007. Passages to adulthood: Linking demographic change and human development. European Journal of Sociology23 (3): 251–72.
31.
SetterstenRichard A.Jr.HagestadGunhild O.1996. What’s the latest? Cultural age deadlines for family transitions. The Gerontologist36 (2): 178–88.
32.
SetterstenRichard A.Jr.RayBarbara. 2010. What’s going on with young people today? The long and twisting path to adulthood. The Future of Children20 (1): 19–41.
33.
ShanahanMichael J.2000. Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: Variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology 26:667–92.
34.
TingKwok-FaiChiuStephen W. K.2002. Leaving the parental home: Chinese culture in an urban context. Journal of Marriage and Family64 (3): 614–26.
35.
WaiteLinda J.GoldscheiderFrances K.WitsbergerChristina. 1986. Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review51:541–54.
36.
WatkinsSusan C.MenkenJane A.BongaartsJohn. 1987. Demographic foundations of family change. American Sociological Review52 (3): 346–58.
37.
WhiteLynnLacyNaomi. 1997. The effects of age at home leaving and pathways from home on educational attainment. Journal of Marriage and the Family59 (4): 982–95.
38.
Winkler-DworakMariaToulemonLaurent. 2007. Gender differences in the transition to adulthood in France: Is there convergence over the recent period?European Journal of Population23:273–314.
39.
YamadaMasahiro. 2001. Parasite singles feed on family system. Japan Quarterly48 (1): 10–16.
40.
YiChin-Chun. 2012. Introduction to the psychological well-being of East Asian youth: Transition from early adolescence to young adulthood. In Psychological well-being of East Asian youth: Transition from early adolescence to young adulthood, ed. YiChin-Chun, 10–35. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
41.
ZhangQian F.2004. Economic transition and new patterns of parent-adult child co-residence in urban China. Journal of Marriage and Family66 (5): 1231–45.
