Familial power contributed to binding territories together and systematically severing them in both China and early modern European states. In the early Qing (1644–1911) Empire, Manchu conquerors met the challenges of securing and expanding rule by discovering ways to use laterally related brothers and imperial bondservants to hold Chinese bureaucrats in check, while deploying bureaucracy to restrain princely brothers from partitioning the state. The ensuing interlock of patrimonial practices and bureaucracy, developed in a style similar to ancien régime France, stabilized political power for centuries.
AdamsJulia. 2005. The familial state: Ruling families and merchant capitalism in early modern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2.
ArmitageDavid. 2000. The ideological origins of the British Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BarfieldThomas J.1989. The perilous frontier: Nomadic empires and China. Studies in Social Discontinuity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
4.
BartlettBeatrice S.1991. Monarchs and ministers: The Grand Council in mid-Ch’ing China, 1723–1820. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
5.
BartlettRobert. 1993. The making of Europe: Conquest, colonization, and cultural change, 950–1350. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BartlettRobertMacKayAngus. 1989. Medieval frontier societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
BeikWilliam. 1988. Absolutism and society in seventeenth-century France: State power and provincial aristocracy in Languedoc. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BossengaGail. 1991. The politics of privilege: Old regime and revolution in Lille. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CarlitzKatherine. 1997. Shrines, governing-class identity, and the cult of widow fidelity in mid-Ming Jiangnan. Journal of Asian Studies56 (3): 612–40.
10.
ChangTe-Ch‘ang. 1972. The economic role of the imperial household in the Ch’ing Dynasty. Journal of Asian Studies31 (2): 243–73.
11.
ClarkSamuel. 1995. State and status: The rise of the state and aristocratic power in Western Europe. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
12.
CoserLewis. 1964. The political functions of eunuchism. American Sociological Review29 (6): 880–85.
13.
DuaraPrasenjit. 1988. Culture, power, and the state: Rural north China, 1900–1942. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
EisenstadtS. N.1963. The political systems of empires. New York, NY: Free Press.
15.
ElvinMark. 1984. Female virtue and the state in China. Past and Present104:111–52.
16.
FletcherJoseph. 1986. The Mongols: Ecological and social perspectives. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies46 (1): 11–50.
17.
GivenJames Buchanan. 1990. State and society in medieval Europe: Gwynedd and Languedoc under outside rule. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18.
GongquanXiao. 1960. Rural China: Imperial control in the nineteenth century. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
19.
GorskiPhilip S.2003. The disciplinary revolution: Calvinism and the rise of the state in early modern Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
HamiltonGary G.1990. Patriarchy, patrimonialism, and filial piety: A comparison of China and Western Europe. British Journal of Sociology41 (1): 77–104.
21.
KetteringSharon. 1986. Patrons, brokers, and clients in seventeenth-century France. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
KiserEdgarTongXiaoxi. 1992. Determinants of the amount and type of corruption in state fiscal bureaucracies: An analysis of late imperial China. Comparative Political Studies25 (3): 300–331.
23.
KuhnPhilip A.1978. Rebellion and its enemies in late imperial China: Militarization and social structure, 1796–1864. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
KumarKrishan. 2010. Nation-states as empires, empires as nation-states: Two principles, one practice?Theory and Society39:119–43.
25.
MannSusan. 1987. Local merchants and the Chinese bureaucracy, 1750–1950. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
McLeanPaul D.2004. Widening access while tightening control: Office-holding, marriages, and elite consolidation in early modern Poland. Theory and Society33:167–212.
27.
PadgettJohn F.AnsellChristopher K.. 1993. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology98:1259–1319.
28.
PerduePeter C.2005. China marches west: The Qing conquest of central Eurasia. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
29.
RootHilton L.1994. The fountain of privilege: Political foundations of markets in old regime France and England. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
30.
Roth-LiGertraude. 1975. The rise of the early Manchu state: A portrait drawn from Manchu sources to 1636. PhD diss., Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
31.
SpenceJonathan D.1988. Ts’ao Yin and the K’ang-Hsi emperor: Bondservant and master. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
TheissJanet M.2004. Disgraceful matters: The politics of chastity in eighteenth-century China. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
33.
TongzuQu. 1969. Local government in China under the Ch’ing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
TorbertPreston M.1977. The Ch’ing imperial household department: A study of its organization and principal functions, 1662–1796. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
WakemanFrederic E.1986. The great enterprise: The Manchu reconstruction of the imperial order in seventeenth-century China. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
36.
WeberMax. 1978. Patriarchalism and patrimonialism. In Economy and society, eds. RothGuentherWittichClaus, 1006–69. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
