This article places feminist state theorists in dialogue with the Weberian “bellicist” tradition, and argues that locating patriarchalism within modern European states remains a worthwhile endeavor. By tracing conscription exemptions for fathers and husbands in France from the French Revolution’s levée en masse through to Napoleonic conscription and into the first half of the twentieth century, this article shows that consideration for male citizens’ patriarchal positions was a consistent feature of French conscription. This is significant given that conscription was an especially powerful and invasive institution of modern states and central to states’ survival within interstate competition. Yet even this intrusive institution did not undermine local patriarchalism in the country many consider to be the cradle of modern mandatory conscription. An extractive state institution was built on crystallization of male familial authority at the level of on-the-ground citizens.
AbramovitzMimi. 1988. Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present. Boston, MA: South End Press.
2.
AdamsJulia. 2005a. The familial state: Ruling families and merchant capitalism in early modern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3.
AdamsJulia. 2005b. The rule of the father: Patriarchy and patrimonialism in early modern Europe. In Max Weber’s economy and society: A critical companion, eds. CamicCharlesGorskiPhilip S.TrubekDavid M., 237–66. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
AndersonPerry. 1974. Lineages of the absolutist state. London: NLB.
5.
ArnoldEric A.1966. Some observations on the French opposition to Napoleonic conscription, 1804–1806. French Historical Studies4:452–62.
6.
AuffretMarc. 1972. La France de l’entre deux guerres. Paris: Culture, Arts, Loisirs.
7.
BardChristine. 1997. Marianne and the mother rabbits: Feminism and natality under the Third Republic. In Population and social policy in France, eds. CrossMáirePerrySheila, 34–48. Washington, DC: Pinter.
8.
BertaudJean Paul. 1979. La révolution armée : Les soldats-citoyens et la Révolution Française. Paris: R. Laffont.
9.
BorisEileenBardaglioPeter. 1983. The transformation of patriarchy: The historic role of the state. In Families, politics and public policy: A feminist dialogue on women and the state, ed. DiamondIrene, 70–93. New York, NY: Longman.
10.
BrownCarol. 1981. Mothers, fathers, and children: From private to public patriarchy. In Women and revolution: A discussion of the unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism, ed. SargentLydia, 239–68. Boston, MA: Sound End Press.
11.
ChallenerRichard D.1965. The French theory of the nation in arms, 1866–1939. New York, NY: Russell & Russell.
12.
CharradMounira. 2001. States and women’s rights: The making of postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
ChildersKristen Stromberg. 2003. Fathers, families, and the state in France, 1914–1945. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14.
DenneryEtienne. 1941. Democracy and the French army. Military Affairs5:233–40.
15.
DowningBrian M. 1992. The military revolution and political change: Origins of democracy and autocracy in early modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
DupâquierJacques. 1988. Histoire de la population Française. Paris: INED/Presses Universitaires de France.
17.
DyerColin L. 1978. Population and society in twentieth century France. New York, NY: Holmes & Meier.
18.
EdwardsLouiseRocesMina, eds. 2000. Women in Asia: Tradition, modernity, and globalisation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19.
EisensteinZillah. 1983. The state, the patriarchal family and working mothers. In Families, politics and public policy: A feminist dialogue on women and the state, ed. DiamondIrene, 41–58. New York, NY: Longman.
20.
ErtmanThomas. 1997. Birth of the Leviathan: Building states and regimes in medieval and early modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
FaronOlivier. 2003. Le père face à ses enfants: Quelques jalons sur l’évolution de l’autorité paternelle (XIXe–XXe siècles). In Lorsque l’enfant grandit: Entre dépendance et autonomie, ed. BardetJean-Pierre, 349–62. Paris: Presses de l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne.
22.
FauréChristine. 1985. La démocratie sans les femmes: Essai sur le libéralisme en France. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
23.
ForrestAlan I. 1989. Conscripts and deserters: The army and French society during the revolution and empire. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
ForrestAlan I. 2002. Napoleon’s men: The soldiers of the revolution and empire. New York, NY: Hambledon Continuum.
25.
FuchsRachel Ginnis. 2008. Contested paternity: Constructing families in modern France. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
GevaDorith. 2006. To father or to fight? Mass conscription and the politics of masculine obligation, France, 1913–1940, and the United States, 1917–1945. PhD diss., New York University, New York.
27.
GiddensAnthony. 1987. The nation-state and violence: Volume 2 of a contemporary critique of historical materialism. Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
GoodwinJoanne L. 1997. Gender and the politics of welfare reform: Mothers’ pensions in Chicago, 1911–1929. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
GordonLinda. 1985. Single mothers and child neglect, 1880–1920. American Quarterly37:173–92.
30.
GordonLinda. 1995. Pitied but not entitled: Single mothers and the history of welfare, 1890–1935. New York, NY: Free Press.
31.
GorskiPhilip S. 2003. The disciplinary revolution: Calvinism and the rise of the state in early modern Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
HaneyLynne. 1996. Homeboys, babies, men in suits: The state and the reproduction of male dominance. American Sociological Review61:759–78.
33.
HaneyLynnePollardLisa, eds. 2003a. Families of a new world: Gender, politics and state development in a global context. New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
HaneyLynnePollardLisa. 2003b. In a family way: Theorizing state and familial relations. In Families of a new world: Gender, politics, and state development in a global context, eds. HaneyLynnePollardLisa, 1–16. New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
HearnJeff. 2002. Men, fathers and the state: National and global relations. In Making men into fathers: Men, masculinities and the social politics of fatherhood, ed. HobsonBarbara, 245–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
HolroydRichard. 1971. The Bourbon army, 1815–1830. The Historical Journal14:529–52.
37.
HorneJohn. 1989. “L’impôt du sang”: Republican rhetoric and industrial warfare in France, 1914–18. Social History14:201–23.
38.
IgraAnna R.2007. Wives without husbands: Marriage, desertion, and welfare in New York, 1900–1935. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
39.
NationaleImprimerie. 1902. Historique des diverses lois sur le recrutement depuis la Révolution jusqu’à nos jours. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
40.
KestnbaumMeyer. 2002. Citizen-soldiers, national service and the mass army: The birth of conscription in revolutionary Europe and North America. Comparative Social Research20:117–44.
41.
KestnbaumMeyer. 2005. Mars revealed: The entry of ordinary people into war among states. In Remaking modernity: Politics, history, and sociology, eds. AdamsJuliaClemensElisabeth S.OrloffAnn Shola, 245–72. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
42.
KlausAlisa. 1993. Depopulation and race suicide: Maternalism and pronatalist ideologies in France and the United States. In Mothers of a new world: Maternalist politics and the origins of welfare states, eds. KovenSethMichelSonya, 188–212. New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
KnibiehlerYvonne. 1997. La révolution maternelle: Femmes, maternité, citoyenneté depuis 1945. Paris: Perrin.
44.
KoosCheryl A.1996. Gender, anti-individualism, and nationalism: The Alliance Nationale and the pronatalist backlash against the femme moderne, 1933–1940. French Historical Studies19:699–723.
45.
KortewegAnna C.2003. Welfare reform and the subject of the working mother: “Get a job, a better job, then a career.”Theory and Society32:445–80.
46.
KovacsArpad F.1946. French military institutions before the Franco-Prussian War. American Historical Review51:217–35.
47.
KovenSethMichelSonya, eds. 1993. Mothers of a new world: Maternalist politics and the origins of welfare states. New York, NY: Routledge.
48.
LasalleCharles Jean. 1893. Code-manuel des obligations militaires, armées de terre et de mer et troupes coloniales. Paris: Librarie militaire Berger-Levrault.
49.
LynnJohn A.1984. The bayonets of the republic: Motivation and tactics in the army of revolutionary France, 1791–94. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
50.
MacKinnonCatharine A.1983. Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: Toward feminist jurisprudence. Signs8:635–58.
51.
MacKinnonCatharine A.1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
MannMichael. 1993. Sources of social power: The rise of classes and nation states, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
McIntoshMary. 1978. The state and the oppression of women. In Feminism and materialism, eds. KuhnAnnetteWolpeAnnmarie, 254–89. London: Routledge.
54.
MessuMichel. 1992. Les politiques familiales du natalisme à la solidarité. Paris: Éditions ouvrières.
55.
MettlerSuzanne. 1998. Dividing citizens: Gender and federalism in New Deal public policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
56.
MillerPavla. 1998. Transformations of patriarchy in the West, 1500–1900. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
57.
Ministre de la Défense Nationale et de la Guerre. Service Historique de l’armée de terre au Château de Vincennes. 22 September 1938 (1938a). Objet: Libération d’Octobre 1939, Circular no. 8405—1/E.M.A, Ministre de la Défense Nationale et de la Guerre.
58.
Ministre de la Défense Nationale et de la Guerre. Service Historique de l’armée de terre au Château de Vincennes. 22 September 1938 (1938b). Objet: Contingent libéré le 18 Août 1938, Circular no. 8406—1/E.M.A, Ministre de la Défense Nationale et de la Guerre.
59.
MinkGwendolyn. 1990. The lady and the tramp: Gender, race and the origins of the American welfare state. In Women, the state and welfare, ed. GordonLinda, 92–122. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
60.
MinkGwendolyn. 1995. The wages of motherhood: Inequality in the welfare state, 1917–1942. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
61.
MonteilhetJoseph. 1932. Les institutions militaires de la France (1814–1932). Paris: F. Alcan.
62.
MulliezJaques. 1989. “Pater is est . . .”: La source juridique de la puissance paternelle du droit révolutionnaire au code civil. In La famille, la loi, l’état: De la révolution au code civil, eds. ThéryIrèneBietChristian, 412–31. Paris: Imprimerie nationale.
63.
MuncyRobyn. 1991. Creating a female dominion in American reform, 1890–1935. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
64.
NelsonBarbara. 1990. The origins of the two channel welfare state: Workman’s compensation and mothers’ aid. In Women, the state and welfare, ed. GordonLinda, 123–51. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
65.
OffenKaren. 1984. Depopulation, nationalism, and feminism in fin-de-siècle France. American Historical Review89:283–98.
66.
OrloffAnn Shola. 1993. Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review58:303–28.
67.
OrloffAnn Shola. 2003. Markets not states? The weakness of state social provision for breadwinning men in the United States. In Families of a new world: Gender, politics, and state development in a global context, eds. HaneyLynnePollardLisa, 217–44. New York, NY: Routledge.
68.
OrloffAnn SholaMonsonRenee. 2002. Citizen, workers, or fathers? Men in the history of U.S. social policy. In Making men into fathers: Men, masculinities and the social politics of fatherhood, ed. HobsonBarbara, 61–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
OtisEileen M.2003. Reinstating the family: Gender and the state-formed foundations of China’s flexible labor force. In Families of a new world: Gender, politics, and state development in a global context, eds. HaneyLynnePollardLisa, 196–216. New York, NY: Routledge.
70.
PatemanCarole. 1988. The patriarchal welfare state. In Democracy and the welfare state, ed. GutmannAmy, 231–60. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71.
PedersenJean Elisabeth. 1996. Regulating abortion and birth control: Gender, medicine, and Republican politics in France, 1870–1920. French Historical Studies19:673–98.
72.
PedersenSusan. 1993. Catholicism, feminism, and the politics of the family during the late Third Republic. In Mothers of a new world: Maternalist politics and the origins of welfare states, eds. KovenSethMichelSonya, 246–76. New York, NY: Routledge.
73.
PedersenSusan. 1995. Family, dependence, and the origins of the welfare state: Britain and France, 1914–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74.
PoggiGianfranco. 1978. The development of the modern state: A sociological introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
75.
PollardLisa. 2004. Nurturing the nation: The family politics of modernizing, colonizing and liberating Egypt 1805–1923. Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press.
76.
PorchDouglas. 1971. The French army law of 1832. The Historical Journal14:751–69.
77.
ProstAntoine. 1988. Catholic conservatives, population, and the family in twentieth century France. Population and Development Review14:147–64.
78.
Recrutement de l’armée: Dispositions générales. 1910. Paris: Henri Charles-Lavauzelle.
79.
ReggianiAndres Horacio. 1996. Procreating France: The politics of demography, 1919–1945. French Historical Studies19:725–54.
80.
RinehartSue Tolleson. 1987. Maternal health care policy: Britain and the United States. Comparative Politics19:193–211.
81.
RobertsMary Louise. 1994. Civilization without sexes: Reconstructing gender in postwar France, 1917–1927. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
82.
RochefortFlorence. 2005. Laïcisation des mœurs et équilibres de genre, le débat sur la capacité civile de la femme mariée (1918–1938). Vingtième Siècle. Revue d’histoire87:129–41.
83.
RonsinFrancis. 1980. La grève des ventres: Propagande néo-Malthusienne et baisse de la natalité Française (19e et 20e siècles). Paris: Aubier Montaigne.
84.
SapiroVirginia. 1986. The gender basis of American social policy. Political Science Quarterly101:221–38.
85.
SchnapperBernard. 1968. Le remplacement militaire en France, quelques aspects politiques, économiques et sociaux du recrutement au XIXe siècle. Paris: S.E.V.P.E.N.
86.
SchnapperBernard. 1991. La correction paternelle et le mouvement des idées au XIXème siècle. In Voies nouvelles en histoire du droit: La justice, la famille, la répression pénale (XVIème siècles), ed. SchnapperBernard, 523–53. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
87.
SkocpolTheda. 1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
88.
SkocpolTheda. 1995. The enactment of mothers’ pensions: Civic mobilization and agenda setting or benefits of the ballot? Response. American Political Science Review89:720–30.
89.
SkocpolThedaAbend-WeinMarjorieHowardChristopherLehmannSusan Goodrich. 1993. Women’s associations and the enactment of mothers’ pensions in the United States. American Political Science Review87:686–701.
90.
Stewart-McDougallMary Lynn. 1989. Women, work, and the French state: Labour protection and social patriarchy, 1879–1919. Kingston, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
91.
TalmyRobert. 1962. Histoire du mouvement familiale en France (1896–1939). Paris: Union nationale des caisses d’allocations familiales.
92.
ThompsonElizabeth. 2000. Colonial citizens: Republican rights, paternal privilege, and gender in French Syria and Lebanon. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
93.
TillyCharles. 1992. Capital, coercion, and European states, AD990–1992. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WeberEugen. 1959. The nationalist revival in France, 1905–1914. Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press.
96.
WeberMax. 1922/1978. Economy and society. Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press.
97.
WillrichMichael. 2000. Home slackers: Men, the state, and welfare in modern America. Journal of American History87:460–89.
98.
WolochIsser. 1986. Napoleonic conscription: State power and civil society. Past & Present111:101–29.
99.
WolochIsser. 1994. The new regime: Transformations of the French civic order, 1789–1820s. New York, NY: Norton.
100.
ZaretskyEli. 1982. The place of the family in the origins of the welfare state. In Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions, eds. ThorneBarrieYalomMarilyn, 188–224. New York, NY: Longman.
