The Putin-Medvedev transition reveals the continuing inability of post-Soviet Russian leaders to arrive at any consensual notion of Russia’s national identity around which ordinary forms of legitimate domination might be constructed. In searching for an answer to the problem of leadership succession during his second term as president, Vladimir Putin tried out all three of the classical types of legitimate domination that Max Weber defined—the traditional, the rational-legal, and the charismatic—without success. In the end, the 2008 elections represented a novel combination of strategies for building state legitimacy that we might term “plebiscitarian patrimonialism”: the Russian leadership claims the right to rule as if the state were its personal property, as long as the results of this arbitrary rule are electorally ratified by “the people” as a true reflection of the national will.
AdamsJulia. 2005. The familial state: Ruling families and merchant capitalism in early modern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2.
ǺslundAnders. 1995. How Russia became a market economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3.
BakerPeterGlasserSusan. 2005. Kremlin rising: Vladimir Putin’s Russia and the end of revolution. New York, NY: Scribner.
4.
BBC News. 25April2005. Putin deplores collapse of USSR. Available from http://news.bbc.co.uk/ (accessed 14 November 2008).
5.
ChenCalvinSilRudra. 2006. Communist legacies, post-Communist transformations, and the fate of organized labor in Russia and China. Studies in Comparative International Development41 (2): 62–87.
ChubaisIgor. 1999. The search for a new Russian identity. Paper presented at the Third Colloquium of the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute for World Economy and International Relations, 3 December, Moscow, Russia. Available from www.loc.gov/about/welcome/speeches/russianperspectives/colloq3s1.html (accessed 24 April 2008).
8.
CIA. 2008. CIA world factbook: Russia. Available from www.cia.gov (accessed 14 November 2008).
9.
CollinsKathleen. 2006. Clan politics and regime transition in Central Asia. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CrawfordBeverlyLijphartArend, eds. 1997. Liberalization and Leninist legacies. Berkeley, CA: International and Area Studies.
11.
DerluguianGeorgi M.2005. Bourdieu’s secret admirer in the Caucasus: A world-system biography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
DiamondLarry. 2002. Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy13 (2): 21–35.
13.
di PalmaGiuseppe. 1990. To craft democracies: An essay on democratic transitions. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
EkiertGrzegorzHansonStephen E.. 2003. Capitalism and democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the legacy of communist rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FrolovVladimir. 3March2008. An election can be boring and democratic. Moscow Times.
17.
HaYong-Chool. 2007. Late industrialization, the state, and social changes: The emergence of neofamilism in South Korea. Comparative Political Studies40 (4): 363–82.
18.
HaleHenry. 2005. Regime cycles: Democracy, autocracy, and revolution in post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics58 (1): 133–65.
19.
HalpinTony. 18April2007. Dmitri Medvedev votes were rigged, says computer boffin. The Times (London).
20.
HansonStephen E.2005. On “double standards”: Toward strategic liberalism in U.S. Russia policy. Program on New Approaches to Russian Security (PONARS) Policy Memo Series, Memo 368. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
21.
HardingLuke. 14November2007. Putin: I have a moral right to continue wielding influence. The Guardian.
22.
HowardMarc Morjé. 2003. The weakness of postcommunist civil society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
JowittKen. 1992. New world disorder: The Leninist extinction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
LevitskyStevenWayLucan. 2002. The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy13 (2): 51–65.
25.
LewinMoshe. 1988. The Gorbachev phenomenon: A historical interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
LinzJuanStepanAlfred. 1995. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and postcommunist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
MillerArthur H.ReisingerWilliam M.HesliVicki L.. 1993. Public opinion and regime change: The new politics of post-Soviet societies. Boulder, CO: Westview.
29.
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)/Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). 2003. Election observation mission report, Republic of Azerbaijan Presidential Election, 15 October 2003. Warsaw, Poland: OSCE/ODIHR.
30.
PipesRichard. 1974. Russia under the old regime. New York, NY: Scribner.
31.
PipesRichard. 2004. Flight from freedom: What Russians think and want. Foreign Affairs83 (3): 9–15.
32.
Pop-ElechesGrigore. 2007. Historical legacies and postcommunist regime change. Journal of Politics69 (4): 908–26.
33.
PrzeworskiAdam. 1991. Democracy and the market: Political reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Regnum News Agency. 2006. Vladimir Putin: Main historical achievement of Boris Yeltsin is freedom. Available from www.regnum.ru/english/582037.html (accessed 14 November 2008).
35.
RigbyT. H.FeherFerenc, eds. 1982. Political legitimation in communist states. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
36.
RoseRichardMishlerWilliamMunroNeil. 2006. Russia transformed: Developing popular support for a new regime. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37.
RupnikJacques. 1999. Eastern Europe a decade later: The postcommunist divide. Journal of Democracy10 (1): 57–62.
38.
SachsJeffrey. 1993. Poland’s jump to the market economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
SchatzEdward. 2004. Modern clan politics: The power of “blood” in Kazakhstan and beyond. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
40.
ShchedrovOleg. 17December2007. Putin ready to become PM in future Russian government. Reuters. Available from http://in.reuters.com (accessed 27 December 2010).
ValetovTimur. 2005. Households in the Russian empire: Extended or nuclear families? In Urban households in Russia and the Soviet Union, 1900–2000: Size, structure and composition, eds. SergeyAfontsevKesslerGijsMarkevichAndreiTyazhel’nikovaVictoriaValetovTimur, 3–17. Amsterdam: l’Institut International d’Histoire Sociale.
45.
VolkovYurii. 15April2008. Interfax.
46.
WallanderCeleste A.2007. Russia’s transimperialism and its implications. Washington Quarterly30 (2): 107–22.
47.
WeberMax. 1978. Economy and society. Vols. 1 and 2. Trans. and eds. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
WoodElizabeth. 2006. Power, performance and centralization in Putin’s Russia, 1999–present. Paper presented at Conference on State and Society in Transition, January, Durham University, Durham, UK.
