Can field experiments be productively employed to study the impact of development assistance on democracy and governance (DG) outcomes? A small but growing number of practitioners and scholars, often working in partnership, are inventing a new research domain at the intersection of evaluation and political science. The article reviews recent and ongoing DG field experiments, and it offers lessons about the prospects and obstacles to the future development of a useful body of experimental evidence on the political economy of development.
Arcand, Jean-Louis. n.d.-a. The FAS III Baseline Survey: Preliminary findings, Angola. Unpublished.
2.
Arcand, Jean-Louis. n.d.-b. Technical proposal for the Baseline Survey for the Impact Evaluation of the Gambia CDDP. Unpublished.
3.
Banerjee, Abhijit, Rukmini Banerji, Esther Duflo, Rachel Glennerster, and Stuti Khemani.2006. Can information campaigns spark local participation and improve outcomes? A study of primary education in Uttar Pradesh, India. SSRN Working Paper Series.
4.
Banerjee, Abhijit, Raghabendra Chattopadhyay, Esther Duflo, and Daniel Keniston . n.d. Police performance, community policing, and public perception in Rajasthan, India. Poverty Action Lab Projects.
5.
Banerjee, Abhijit, Jennifer Green, Donald Green, and Rohini Pande. n.d. Campaigns to influence voting behavior in India . Poverty Action Lab Projects.
6.
Beaman, Lori, Raghabendra Chattopadhyay, Esther Duflo, Rohini Pande, and Petia Topalova.2008. Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias?Paper presented at Northeastern Universities Development Consortium Conference, Boston University, Boston, MA, November 8-9.
7.
Beath, Andrew, Fotini Christia, and Ruben Enikolopov .2008. Randomized impact evaluation of Afghanistan’s National Solidarity Program (NSP): Hypotheses and methodology . http://www.nsp-ie.org/reports/HM.pdf
8.
Bertrand, Marianne, Simeon Djankov, Rema Hanna, and Sendhil Mullainathan .2006. Obtaining a driver’s license in India: An experimental approach to studying corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics122 (4): 1639-76.
9.
Björkman, Martina, and Jakob Svensson.2007. Power to the people: Evidence from a randomized field experiment of a community-based monitoring project in Uganda . World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
10.
Casey, Katherine Whiteside, Rachel Glennerster, and Edward Miguel.2009. Does community driven development improve collective action in post-war Sierra Leone?Poverty Action Lab Projects.
11.
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, and Esther Duflo.2004. Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica72 (5): 1409-43.
12.
Collier, Paul, and Pedro C. Vicente .2008. Votes and violence: Evidence from a field experiment in Nigeria. Households in Conflict Network (HiCN) Working Papers Series.
13.
Committee on the Evaluation of USAID Democracy Assistance Programs.2007. Improving democracy assistance: Building knowledge through evaluations and research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
14.
, De La O Torres, Ana Lorena , 2008. Do poverty relief funds affect electoral behavior? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Mexico . Paper presented at Field Experiments in Comparative Politics and Policy, University of Manchester, UK, July 1-2.
15.
Driscoll, Jesse, and Diego Hidalgo.2009. Against the machine: Experimental results from Georgia’s 2008 parliamentary election. Paper read at annual meeting of the American Political Science Association , Toronto, Canada, August.
16.
Duflo, Esther, Greg Fischer, and Raghabendra Chattopadhyay .2005. Efficiency and rent seeking in local governments: Evidence from randomized policy experiments in India . MIT Working Papers.
17.
Duflo, Esther, and Rema Hanna.2005. Monitoring works: Getting teachers to come to school. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series no. 11880.
18.
Fearon, James, Macartan Humphreys, and Jeremy M. Weinstein .2009. Can outsiders build cohesion after civil war: Evidence from a field experiment in post-conflict Liberia . American Economic Review99 (2): 287-91.
19.
Ferraz, Claudio, and Frederico Finan .2007. Exposing corrupt politicians: The effects of Brazil’s publicly released audits on electoral outcomes . Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Discussion Papers.
20.
Gershman, Carl, and Michael Allen.2006. New threats to freedom: The assault on democracy assistance. Journal of Democracy17 (2): 36-51.
21.
Goldstein, Markus.2009. The mediation and community legal empowerment of the Support for Poor and Disadvantaged Areas Project in Indonesia (Spada/Mcle) impact evaluation. Unpublished work in progress. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTISPMA/Resources/Training-Events-and-Materials/449365-1208956735213/Day2_Session3_MGoldstein_MCLE_IEdesign.ppt#256,1, (accessed March 21, 2009).
22.
Guan, Mei, and Donald P. Green .2006. Noncoercive mobilization in state-controlled elections: An experimental study in Beijing. Comparative Political Studies29 (10): 1175-93.
23.
Gugerty, Mary Kay, and Michael Kremer.2008. Outside funding and the dynamics of participation in community associations. American Journal of Political Science52 (3): 585-602.
24.
Humphreys, Macartan. n.d. Political and economic impacts of development aid in Eastern Congo . Unpublished.
25.
Humphreys, Macartan, William Masters, and Martin Sandu.2007. The role of leaders in democratic deliberations: Results from a field experiment in São Tomé and Príncipe . World Politics58:583-622.
26.
Humphreys, Macartan, and Jeremy M. Weinstein .2007. Policing politicians: Citizen empowerment and political accountability in Africa. Paper read at annual meeting of the American Political Science Association , Chicago, IL, August.
27.
Humphreys, Macartan, and Jeremy M. Weinstein .2009. Field experiments and the political economy of development. Annual Review of Political Science12:367-76.
28.
Hyde, Susan D.2008. Randomizing international election observation: The 2004 presidential elections in Indonesia. Paper presented at presentation at Ohio State University, Columbus, OH , May 16.
29.
Ichino, Nahomi, and Matthias Schündeln .2009. Political participation and electoral malpractices in Ghana: The role of domestic election observers and information. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto , Canada, August.
30.
King, Gary, Emmanuela Gakidou, Nirmala Ravishankar, Ryan T. Moore, Jason Lakin, Manett Vargas, Martha Maria Tellez-Rojo, Juan Eugenio Hernandez Avila, Mauricio Hernandez Avila, and Hector Hernandez Llama.2007. A politically robust experimental design for public policy evaluation, with application to the Mexican universal health insurance program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management26 (3): 479-506.
31.
Kremer, Michael, Sylvie Moulin, and Robert Namunyu.2003. Decentralization: A cautionary tale . Poverty Action Lab, Paper no. 10.
32.
Lierl, Malte.2009. Personal communication about the Village Community Support Program in Guinea.
33.
Miguel, Edward, Michael Kremer, and Rebecca Thornton .2008. Does education change political attitudes? Evidence from a Kenyan school experiment. Paper presented at the Working Group in African Political Economy (WGAPE) , University of California, Berkeley , December 5-6.
34.
Moehler, Devra C.2008. Tune in to governance: An experimental investigation of radio campaigns in Africa. Paper presented at Field Experiments in Comparative Politics and Policy, University of Manchester, UK, July 1-2.
35.
Olken, Benjamin A.2007a. Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy115 (2): 200-249.
36.
Olken, Benjamin A.2007b. Political institutions and local public goods: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Poverty Action Lab Working Papers.
37.
Özler, Berk, Sarah Baird, and Craig McIntosh. n.d. Vulnerable groups component of Tanzania’s Social Action Fund (TASAF). Unpublished.
38.
Paluck, Elizabeth Levy.2008. Is it better not to talk? A field experiment on talk radio and ethnic relations in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
39.
Paluck, Elizabeth Levy.2009. Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96 (3): 574-87.
40.
Paluck, Elizabeth Levy. n.d. Information radio in southern Sudan. Unpublished.
41.
Pandey, Priyanka, Sangeeta Goyal, and Venkatesh Sundararaman .2008. Community participation in public schools: The impact of information campaigns in three Indian states . Impact Evaluation Series 26, Policy Research Working Paper 4776.
42.
Savedoff, William D., Ruth Levine, and Nancy Birdsall.2006. When will we ever learn? Improving lives through impact evaluation. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
43.
Vicente, Pedro C.2007. Is vote buying effective? Evidence from a randomized experiment in West Africa. Economics Series Working Papers 318, University of Oxford, Department of Economics , Oxford, UK.
44.
Wantchekon, Leonard.2003. Clientelism and voting behavior: Evidence from a field experiment in Benin. World Politics55 (3): 399-422.
45.
Wantchekon, Leonard.2008. Expert information, public deliberation, and electoral support for "good" governance: Experimental evidence from Benin. Paper read at Field Experiments in Comparative Politics and Policy , University of Manchester, UK, July 1-2.
